1

Topic: Ominous laughter of AI

#At office considered confidential enough things, and Alexa burst out laughing. At someone else such was? https://vc.ru/34388-pomoshchnik-amazon- … him-smehom

2

Re: Ominous laughter of AI

Hello, Trotsky, you wrote: # office considered confidential enough things, and Alexa burst out laughing. At someone else such was? AI already  conceives

3

Re: Ominous laughter of AI

Trotsky: # office considered confidential enough things, and Alexa burst out laughing. At someone else such was? Whether it is necessary to repeat, what "clever things" is a hole in safety (well, though something in )?. To Consider secrets at such gadgets - idiocy top. https://vc.ru/34388-pomoshchnik-amazon- … him-smehom I speak, the anti-Utopia comes. Soon pilotless cars, creations of our colleagues-programmistishek, will dissect on streets and to force down whom not . It  is not ridiculous.

4

Re: Ominous laughter of AI

Hello, Drobodan Frilich, you wrote: > I speak, the anti-Utopia comes. Soon pilotless cars, creations of our colleagues-programmistishek, > will dissect on streets and to force down whom not . It  is not ridiculous. Dear Drobodan, it is not necessary to force horror. Complexity  in billions years anywhere did not get to. All so-called hacks and other  are errors of IMPLEMENTATION. Always. For such important things of errors will not be (as, for example,  has no possibility to control the MICROSECOND)

5

Re: Ominous laughter of AI

Hello, wl., you wrote: wl.> Dear Drobodan, it is not necessary to force horror. Complexity  in billions years anywhere did not get to. All so-called hacks and other  are errors of IMPLEMENTATION. Always. Did not know that IMPLEMENTATION errors already cancelled.

6

Re: Ominous laughter of AI

Hello, Lazytech, you wrote: L> did not know that IMPLEMENTATION errors already cancelled. Well I gave an example,  the MICROSECOND, or, for example, the Zaporozhye atomic power station. In serious projects each letter is exposed to repeated testing. The rights to an error are not present. (Forgive for pathos)

7

Re: Ominous laughter of AI

Hello, wl., you wrote: wl.> Well I gave an example,  the MICROSECOND, or, for example, the Zaporozhye atomic power station. In serious projects each letter is exposed to repeated testing. The rights to an error are not present. (Forgive for pathos) I Apologize, and the local network servers of electronic mail of the Pentagon is a serious project? P.S. If I am not mistaken, because of the errors of implementation admitted by programmers rather not cheap automatic space flights failed some.

8

Re: Ominous laughter of AI

Hello, Lazytech, you wrote: L> I Apologize, and the local network servers of electronic mail of the Pentagon is a serious project? Everything, I understood, at what you drive, not important what force the cryptography while it is serviced by the people pity and petty, it possesses is vulnerable. It is necessary to eliminate this factor simply. (The main thing not to give birth to the Terminator in process)

9

Re: Ominous laughter of AI

Hello, wl., you wrote: wl.> Everything, I understood, at what you drive, not important what force the cryptography while it is serviced by the people pity and petty, it possesses is vulnerable. If I am not mistaken, in *nix found out the errors remaining not noted more ten years. wl.> it is necessary to eliminate this factor simply. (The main thing not to give birth to the Terminator in process) Well it is finite, same so it is simple! P.S. Nearly did not forget, Meltdown and Spectre found out only after some years after their free or involuntary "bookmark".

10

Re: Ominous laughter of AI

11

Re: Ominous laughter of AI

Hello, Trotsky, you wrote: # office considered confidential enough things, and Alexa burst out laughing. At someone else such was? Payment approaches, leather mongrels.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

12

Re: Ominous laughter of AI

Hello, Trotsky, you wrote: # office considered confidential enough things, and Alexa burst out laughing. At someone else such was? https://vc.ru/34388-pomoshchnik-amazon- … him-smehom At us generally for this purpose  is, there all secrets are considered. And yes, there phones and  to take

13

Re: Ominous laughter of AI

Hello, wl., you wrote: wl.> Well I gave an example,  the MICROSECOND, or, for example, the Zaporozhye atomic power station. In serious projects each letter is exposed to repeated testing. The rights to an error are not present. (Forgive for pathos) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet Breaking uranium  has been produced even without equipment access to a network.