1

Topic: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

The interesting fact: Three schoolgirls started to laugh and cry uncontrolledly, their laughter infected 95 of 159 schoolgirls, age from 12 till 18 years [5 [6] [4]. The laughter proceeded from several o'clock till 16 days. The laughter was not spread to teachers, but schoolgirls could not retain attention to study because of what on March, 18th, 1962 school temporarily closed [7]. On May, 21st occupations tried to restart, but it did not manage to be made (epidemic by that moment was already selected for village limits) [4].... On school in which epidemic began, brought an action. The uncontrolled laughter enveloped somewhat all schools Kashashi and adjacent village [7]. Epidemic came to an end in 18 months after the beginning [8]. Except laughter it was informed on accompanying symptoms: pains, faints, , problems with breath, rashes, attacks of crying and shouts [9]. In total 14 schools have been closed, more than 1000 persons got under action of epidemic [10]. Here WIKI. Thus nobody knows why the such happened and as with similar to struggle. Like from mind on a singleton descend (). . No. Why we accuse people who underwent to a mass hysteria (as that nazi germanium or event  in 2013-2014)? It turns out with everyone can happen. It is necessary simply that human society to recognize subject to the given disorder and to invent as with it to struggle.

2

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

S> nobody knows why the such happened There in wiki is written - why such happened.

3

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

4

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

Hello, Ejnstok Fajr, you wrote: S>> nobody knows why the such happened > There in wiki is written - why such happened. One of the possible reasons of origin of epidemic of laughter name a combination of the bad conditions of the content of schoolgirls (inconvenient chairs, a hostel without windows and severity of teachers) and impossibility to make the protest; "Possible" - you want to read as a fact in evidence. Not the fact - unless very few people at that time studied in the bad conditions. Why happened - nobody knows, and wrote to fill vacuum and nobody thought that this problem is actual till now.

5

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> Here it is even more interesting A> https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/_ It is considered that it was only in the Middle Ages. A hysterics and so forth But that if now mental epidemics anywhere did not get to, and only found more noble type. Than "Glory to Ukraine - to Heroes glory"  from a hysterics?

6

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Than "Glory to Ukraine - to Heroes glory"  from a hysterics? I at you there was not, I do not know how much it is spread and in what form. But it seems to me that simply control of broad masses and propagation. It is important to people to be copresent to something, here they and are copresent - to that to favourably ruling mode. Set of people from Ukraine here at a forum any "to heroes glory" do not suffer, and in real life I think them even more.

7

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

Any virus can?

8

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Why we accuse people who underwent to a mass hysteria (as that nazi germanium or event  in 2013-2014)? It turns out with everyone can happen. The patient does not admit that it the patient. Therefore the example more close here is not resulted.

9

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> I at you there was not, I do not know how much it is spread and in what form. But it seems to me that simply control of broad masses and propagation. It is important to people to be copresent to something, here they and are copresent - to that to favourably ruling mode. Probably infectious laughter which thousand children were ill - has the same nature of propagation which is used by politicians for infection of people with the delirium. Loudly expressively to shout "glory to Ukraine" - you look - already all walk and "bark". A> Set of people from Ukraine here at a forum any "to heroes glory" do not suffer, and in real life I think them even more. So... Not on all the hysteria operates. In the same place too not all caught laughter.

10

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

Hello, vsb, you wrote: vsb> any virus Can? A mental virus.

11

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

Hello, vsb, you wrote: vsb> any virus Can? More likely substance. But who to you admits?

12

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> It is necessary simply that human society to recognize subject to the given disorder and to invent as with it to struggle. The British classics reflected on this question)) Air circus Monti Pajtona. A season 1. An episode 1. A sketch: the Most ridiculous joke in the world. (The funniest joke in the world) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Itb6n1TtaA0

13

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> loudly expressively to shout "the glory to Ukraine" - look - already all walk and "bark". Urgently go in , there you of all cure.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

14

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

Hello, CreatorCray, you wrote: S>> loudly expressively to shout "the glory to Ukraine" - look - already all walk and "bark". CC> Urgently go in , there you of all cure. The blessing, I mass  do not give in to this, it is not necessary so anywhere to go. The minus in it too is - those who barks slantwise look at you. After all all walk and bark and you are silent. Do not love the such.

15

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> the Blessing, I mass  do not give in to this, it is not necessary so anywhere to go. All you give in. Already wrote.

16

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> Here it is even more interesting A> https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/_ more interesting now when on peak of any national hysterics it is possible to lose all because of anonymous charge.

17

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

S> loudly expressively to shout "the glory to Ukraine" - look - already all walk and "bark". And you are frequent so do?

18

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

Hello, Real 3L0, you wrote: S>> the Blessing, I mass  do not give in to this, it is not necessary so anywhere to go. R3> All you give in. Already wrote. You enrages as I do not give in to the Russian hysteria. And for you it means - that I a stranger. Not for you - means against you. But is not present, I really do not give in on these to a hysteria, the set of times is checked up.

19

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

Hello, Iron Monkey, you wrote: IM> And you are frequent so do? No, what for to scoff at sick people. But some do. And purposely shout "fat dropped" - and the crowd starts to bark.

20

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

Hello, anonymous, you wrote: A> it is more interesting now when on peak of any national hysterics it is possible to lose all because of anonymous charge. Absolutely different things. It was possible to get to disgrace always, at any power. And occasions always were (there would be a person and the occasion is). The suspicion in heresy/sorcery in the Middle Ages, in anti-Soviet activity in the USSR, in sympathies for communists in the USA etc. In a case with  mass  all is much more interesting than 20th century. It as a matter of fact a cool hole (vulnerability) in human mentality and if to learn it to exploit the mental weapon in the pure state turns out. Only here is how it works?

21

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> you enrages as I do not give in to the Russian hysteria. And for you it means - that I a stranger. Not for you - means against you. If you to it did not move, as an example wrote about that hysteria, which nearby. But you about not did not write it. Means or do not see (that hardly since it it is visible in each village), either you do not consider as a hysteria, or it agree. The second or the third - gave in. S> but is not present, I really do not give in on these to a hysteria, the set of times is checked up. Was this once enough.

22

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

23

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Thus nobody knows why the such happened and as with similar to struggle. Like from mind on a singleton descend (. . No. A fire on neighboring thickets of hemp?

24

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass

25

Re: Epidemic of laughter and the fact of a recognition mass