1

Topic: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Caught itself on thought that for the last 20 years it is not created any good film. Tastes at all different, therefore determination for a case in point: the good film is what reconsider. To beat off from charges in style "and a grass was ?", I will note that the films created till my birth, too go on "hurrah". We take, for example, "Girls". Black-and-white, special effects , boobs and fights are not present, beautiful life or a seamy side miss. Is, truth, the machine with the powerful motor - . But as looks! And here to what output I came: the modern cinema  because of misunderstanding of importance of processes! So, whether is at cinema Agile? Yes, is called "serials". Note, how much they it is more attractive than the cascade films. Whether there are new versions? And that:" Irony of destiny-2 "and other  in assortment. More than new versions, and old to make inaccessible! Now after all nobody removes on an analog film, so? So, the server with the monitoring system of versions is necessary. It seems that cinema-men do not use Git. Further, a covering tests. Check of scenes at all misses, and after all not and it is difficult to describe requirements -" hi-hi 3 times, pulse 90, avaricious tear ". Audit of quality of game is even easier - the size of pauses between remarks, a correct partition on scenes, on the foreground and a back view, reusage of ancient jokes, application 9 Shakespearean subject patterns. Before cinema was functional - it should cause laughter, tears, fear, adrenaline and etc. the object-oriented cinema Now prospers: the audience selects on objects and  with known names. The favor of review needs to be reduced to a minimum, and in exchange to pile on the spectator the big heap of glamour"features"in the form of computer effects. Let's not forget to replace the director with the skram-master. And, as soon as in the film industry processes will be adjusted, is mandatory there will be films which can be recalled in a retrospective show.

2

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, mgu, you wrote: mgu> Caught itself on thought that for the last 20 years it is not created any good film. <...> Well very courageous statement!

3

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

L> Well very courageous statement! Well name though a little which took away on citations, we tell as kin-dza-dza?

4

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: K> well name though a little which took away on citations, we tell as kin-dza-dza? "Kin-dza-dza" is a cult cinema. There are simply excellent films which do not become cult. P.S. We now consider the Russian cinema or generally any? P.P.S. I will enumerate some very different films which have been removed for last 20 years. A blind-man's-buff (2005) As Vit'ka Chesnok carried Lehu of the Dowel in a nursing home (2017) Come to look at me (2000) And it only at the Russian films, and only what were recalled for pair minutes.

5

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, mgu, you wrote: mgu> Caught itself on thought that for the last 20 years it is not created any good film. Tastes at all different, therefore determination for a case in point: the good film is what reconsider. To beat off from charges in style "and a grass was ?", I will note that the films created till my birth, too go on "hurrah". If criterion "reconsider", for the last 20 years it is removed a lot of good, it is simple in film service normally not so successfully (type as Big Lebovski or Once in Ireland), but becomes known later.

6

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: K> well name though a little which took away on citations, we tell as kin-dza-dza? Tarantino's films. Any pieces of type "Dzhej and a silent Bean strike back". Big Lebovski. Good films... Well Interstellar, for example.

7

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, mgu, you wrote: mgu> And as soon as in the film industry processes will be adjusted, is mandatory there will be films which can be recalled in a retrospective show. As these attempts of analogies are ridiculous... I think, all is easier - cinema as an art genre died. It became completely commercial. The reasons probably millions. I would select two cores. 1. All that could be removed - it is removed. Also it is removed by outstanding masters, to surpass which very difficult, if at all probably. It will be only remakes, even at ideal implementation. Which is already impossible, point 2 see. 2. Cinema generally - the phenomenon of 20 centuries. The best film receptions have been opened and implemented in 20 century. Besides geniuses in the sphere. Anybody will not try to get seriously Pushkin's monastery, or there Dostoevsky. Their epoch left. It is necessary to accept simply as the fact that now for us waits only commercial pseudo-clever (at the best)  for devourers , and the budget and an abundance of special effects will be a unique criterion of a steepness of a film for them. What or masterpieces to expect any more does not cost, the cinema epoch left. I think, it is possible to apply Gumilev's theory to art genres. There was for example an epoch of antique sculptures. They showed beauty of a human body. They made it. Something the best already is hardly possible, and the epoch transited for a long time already. In the presence of fire the weapon, a knightly armor and , it lost all . And the modern Olympic Games are a continuous dope. The modern bodybuilding - reviews of the hypertrophied anabolic freaks. There was an epoch of classical music. Some musical instruments have been invented, and finished to practical , creative energy of people which spent on all of them forces, searched an output and here for result - Mozart, Bach, Tchaikovsky, etc. It is now already unreal.  music I want to mark one more surge - 60 - 70th years - progressive fate.  there at us still... About the literature spoke. Well and cinema. Gold years of cinema - 50 - 70th years of 20 centuries when all principal film receptions have been opened, and they at all do not demand computer graphics. It is normal operation of the operator, anything else. All that could be made, it has been made. Twice into one river you will not enter. Stagnation, in 80 the crisis aggravated in 90 began years, and  proceeds  a bottom. From art of the film turned to a normal forage for cattle. P.S. By the way comparing of cinema and IT  basically since the cinema is art, and IT simply technologies which are defined by technical progress. Technical progress cannot be a premise to creativity. Here if to take computer , that is another matter. And here we see the same pattern - during a certain time frame (90th years), computer games as an art genre, reached the maximum development. Some masterpieces, in the ideal embodiment took shape. All. Above it is impossible to spring already,  on any amount of polygons. There there was a quintessence, an ideal.

8

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, 3V, you wrote: 3V> Good films... 3V> Well Interstellar, for example. Funny, I consider it as the sample , and someone considers it as a good film. And you looked Hitchcock's films, the Bunk room, Elia Kazana, Josa Stellinga, Bergman? From the point of view of CINEMA (instead of pseudo-scientific character with doubtful value) - Intersteller - absolute zero.

9

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, vl690001x, you wrote: V> Hello, 3V, you wrote: 3V>> Good films... 3V>> Well Interstellar, for example. V> it is amusing, I consider it as the sample , and someone considers it as a good film. V> and you looked Hitchcock's films, the Bunk room, Elia Kazana, Josa Stellinga, Bergman? V> from the point of view of CINEMA (instead of pseudo-scientific character with doubtful value) - Intersteller - absolute zero. I looked, the strong directors. And Nolan - the genius!

10

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: L>> Well very courageous statement! K> well name though a little which took away on citations, we tell as kin-dza-dza? The brother (both parts).

11

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, ssmaslov, you wrote: S> Nolan - the genius! Yes what it the genius, normal  sawing mullions-strong budgets, thus certainly return  - successful business, and all. Where there genius? Spielberg's analog.

12

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, mgu, you wrote: mgu> Caught itself on thought that for the last 20 years it is not created any good film. Tastes at all different, therefore determination for a case in point: the good film is what reconsider. To beat off from charges in style "and a grass was ?", I will note that the films created till my birth, too go on "hurrah". So. That purposefully reconsidered removed of the last 20 years. The cloudy atlas 2012 Dreamers 2003 Bertolucci - remaining that Talented Mr. Ripli of Guards of the Galaxy (with the child) the Matrix the Men in black reconsidered> 20 years Rome (serial) Perhaps when  I will reconsider Game of thrones and In all heavy, Vudi Allen of the last 10 years, queue not looked yet does not come to an end. Anything from the Soviet desire to reconsider is not present.

13

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, swame, you wrote: S> Anything from the Soviet desire to reconsider is not present. I here time 3 reconsidered only 12 chairs.

14

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, Lazytech, you wrote: mgu>> Caught itself on thought that for the last 20 years it is not created any good film. <...> L> well very courageous statement! Yes simply grows old.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

15

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: K> well name though a little which took away on citations, we tell as kin-dza-dza? Fight club, Snatch

16

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: K> well name though a little which took away on citations, we tell as kin-dza-dza? And it that, a film merit figure?

17

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: L>> Well very courageous statement! K> well name though a little which took away on citations, we tell as kin-dza-dza? Probably reason of citing of the Soviet films not only in their any the person , but also that earlier people have been rather restricted that they could see on a TV set and at cinema. Because of it it was necessary to look the best films from this that there are on many time and accordingly they and were quoted. Would twist every year instead of "" any "hunters behind ghosts" or "back in the future", them too would quote not less.

18

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, vl690001x, you wrote: V> As these attempts of analogies are ridiculous... V> I think, all is easier - cinema as an art genre died. It became completely commercial. The art house anywhere did not get to.

19

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, swame, you wrote: S> So. That purposefully reconsidered removed of the last 20 years. I would name a serial which purposefully reconsidered, but I will not be better, and that a subject in the Policy take down. Only I will hint: Mr. White, it Heisenberg. S> Anything from the Soviet desire to reconsider is not present. And I look sometimes. I will name some films : Check on roads (1971) Holiday in September (1979) My friend Ivan Lapshin (1984) Cold summer of fifty third... (1987)

20

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, CreatorCray, you wrote: CC> Yes simply grows old. Grows old or matures?

21

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, vl690001x, you wrote: K>> well name though a little which took away on citations, we tell as kin-dza-dza? V> And it that, a film merit figure? It is an index .

22

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, mgu, you wrote: mgu> Caught itself on thought that for the last 20 years it is not created any good film. Tastes at all different, therefore determination for a case in point: the good film is what reconsider. 20 years - the big period and if to take the given criterion, here films which I reconsidered: the Lord of rings the Matrix In all heavy Drank the Triangle of Cuba 1997 Dark knight 300 Can and still that...

23

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: L>> Well very courageous statement! K> well name though a little which took away on citations, we tell as kin-dza-dza? This is Sparta!  the debts always pay...

24

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, Lazytech, you wrote: L> I would name a serial which purposefully reconsidered, but I will not be better, and that a subject in the Policy take down. Only I will hint: Mr. White, it Heisenberg. Did not hear. However, I more often stupid   look for . And that, watchfully. Sometimes I look "Avengers" (1965). L> And I look sometimes. I will name some films : "Through thorns to stars" 1980. "Teheran-43", 1980 Sometimes "Moscow-Kassiopeja" and "Revolt of machines" "Adolescents in the Universe". Some old films, straight off I will not recall.

25

Re: About cinema from the point of view of IT

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: K> well name though a little which took away on citations, we tell as kin-dza-dza? Down the House.