#### Re: 80 levels

Hello, Real 3L0, you wrote: R3> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezf5oeP3eRE I correctly understood that it under truck flew by!?

#### Re: 80 levels

Hello, _FRED _, you wrote: _FR> I correctly understood that it under truck flew by!? In my opinion did not reach a little.

#### Re: 80 levels

Hello, _FRED _, you wrote: _FR> I correctly understood that it under truck flew by!? Yes, under the semitrailer.

#### Re: 80 levels

Hello, qwertyuiop, you wrote: Q> In my opinion did not reach a little. Under.

#### Re: 80 levels

Hello, Real 3L0, you wrote: This all 100, if not 108 lvl.

#### Re: 80 levels

Hello, Sharov, you wrote: Q>> In my opinion did not reach a little. S> under. Yes, precisely. Flew on the left side, and took off on the right. Carried that it there did not stick together with the squanderer.

#### Re: 80 levels

Hello, hardcase, you wrote: _FR>> I correctly understood that it under truck flew by!? H> yes, under the semitrailer. Yes, really remarkable video! Health to the lucky person.

#### Re: 80 levels

Hello, Real 3L0, you wrote: R3> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezf5oeP3eRE If not voice record I would not check that this real video.

#### Re: 80 levels

Hello, Real 3L0, you wrote: If to think, not too it and is improbable. It went with speed of a waggon, more precisely, the component of a vector of the speed, directed along road, coincides with that at a waggon, thus there is still the component of speed directed perpendicularly to road distinct from zero... Clearly, is also a friction, but in the school textbook of physics where subjects fall without resistance of air and slide on surfaces without a sliding friction, actually other variants of a decoupling of a situation and could not be... Well and in real carried that the ratio of a friction and normal component speed sufficed to have time to be rolled out from under wheels to that pore while the friction did not drag under wheels.

#### Re: 80 levels

Hello, LaPerouse, you wrote: LP> Hello, Real 3L0, you wrote: LP> If to think, not too it and is improbable. It went with speed of a waggon, more precisely, the component of a vector of the speed, directed along road, coincides with that at a waggon, thus there is still the component of speed directed perpendicularly to road distinct from zero... Clearly, is also a friction, but in the school textbook of physics where subjects fall without resistance of air and slide on surfaces without a sliding friction, actually other variants of a decoupling of a situation and could not be... Well and in real carried that the ratio of a friction and normal component speed sufficed to have time to be rolled out from under wheels to that pore while the friction did not drag under wheels. No, it entered at the left where dredging and quitted behind-to the left of the right wheel. Hardly more to the left-is more rightly also would get under one of back wheels. On the right it would not quit any more, since there a barrier to the most back wheel

#### Re: 80 levels

Hello, Vetal_ca, you wrote: V _> Is not present, it entered at the left where dredging and quitted behind-to the left of the right wheel. Hardly more to the left-is more rightly also would get under one of back wheels. On the right it would not quit any more since there a barrier to the most back wheel it is true, I and did not note sides, more precisely, did not understand, what they low (can just on such case?)

#### Re: 80 levels

Hello, Real 3L0, you wrote: And what it it so to wind the beginning?