1

Topic: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Whether is . A title for such situation: I.e. conflicts two rules: on the one hand To should pass  which moves directly. On the other hand  cannot continue driving since should pass which should pass K.Poluchaetsja classical lock as at a multithreading. Questions such: 1. How such situation is called? Or not titles? 2. Whether there are other variants of locks? Here, when on the machine on each of roads - the situation is absolutely not solvable what rules, only a toss to throw. 3. Whether all well know about this lock? To mine this the most interesting, I in a head started to sort out at once possible collisions and at once I was interested by this situation. I also needs to begin training with it. But, write: On occupations often ask a question: So after all almost anybody so does not arrive (does not pass). Does not arrive - because many simply do not know, how it is necessary to do correctly! If there will be a road accident, there arrives the worker of GAI who makes the circuit of road accident proceeding from these rules, and in court will define guilty By the way, already considered the similar: https://rsdn.org/forum/life/4816301.flat the Author: ssp_alex Date: 12.07.12

2

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> 1. How such situation is called? Or not titles? Crossroads journey. S> 2. Whether there are other variants of locks? Here, when on the machine on each of roads - the situation is absolutely not solvable what rules, only a toss to throw. It at all lock! S> 3. Whether all well know about this lock?... What for delirium?  listen here! Action 1. "To" leaves on a crossroads and passes "" which goes directly, at this time costs and does not twitch. Action 2. "To" completes manoeuvre and releases a crossroads. Action 3. Passes a crossroads. All Shmzh! All by rules, locks are not present. Learn traffic regulations... Though to whom I it...  there is though that that in what you generally  except  and the fan?

3

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, BOBKA_XPEH, you wrote: BOB> to Shmzh listen here! BOB> Action 1. "To" leaves on a crossroads and passes "" which goes directly, at this time costs and does not twitch. BOB> action 2. "To" completes manoeuvre and releases a crossroads. BOB> action 3. Passes a crossroads. You think America opened? Even on a site whence I took a picture there is this . But it only a method to resolve lock, and enough curve, after all To all will hinder. It would be possible to invent a different way of resolution of lock. At you an error: http://rsdn.org/forum/auto/7059425.1 the Author: Shmj Date: 20.02 00:53

4

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> classical lock, as Turns out at a multithreading. S> questions such: S> 1. How such situation is called? Or not titles? S> 2. Whether there are other variants of locks? Here, when on the machine on each of roads - the situation is absolutely not solvable what rules, only a toss to throw. S> 3. Whether all well know about this lock? To mine this the most interesting, I in a head started to sort out at once possible collisions and at once I was interested by this situation. I also needs to begin training with it. But, write: Lock will be when 4 cars are going to pass simultaneously an equivalent crossroads directly. To traffic regulations it is written about it: Rules do not regulate such situation, hence, drivers should define sequence of driving under the arrangement. This situation is considered in driving school. At you it is right is?

5

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S>... After all To all will hinder. Only in installed Shmzhi... S> it would be possible to invent a different way of resolution of lock. A candelabrum Blokchejnom on a pan. , learn already logical thinking, same it is not difficult!

6

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> 1. How such situation is called? Or not titles? Dead lock (deadlock). S> 2. Whether there are other variants of locks? Here, when on the machine on each of roads - the situation is absolutely not solvable what rules, only a toss to throw. Not the toss and to agree. Normally at whom a high-grade jeep, that passes the first, then the remaining. S> 3. Whether all well know about this lock? To mine this the most interesting, I in a head started to sort out at once possible collisions and at once I was interested by this situation. In this situation there is nothing interesting. Intersection of equivalent roads it something from village where there go two machines a day. At a little active driving always put principal/minor (or a traffic light). I for 5 years faced journey of an equipotential crossroads  times and always it there was a world wrong side. A question is exceptional theoretical. Here the intersection of inadequate roads is really important subject. Generally on my observations a problem of the Soviet formation of drivers in excessive attention to insignificant questions and silent lowering of the questions really essential. On  90 % of the questions which are not concerning to 90 % of driving. With what speed the bus with children on a country route, aha can go. Yes  to me, with what speed it there can go, I control the car. Or the questions fastened on knowledge of for how many meters what signs before Ry moving stand. Yes  to me, besides. Saw moving, passed by rules, that's all. Let  there  the read it, when put signs.

7

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, , you wrote: [q] 13.11. At a crossroads of equivalent roads, except for a case provided by point 13.11 (1) of Rules, the driver  a vehicle is obliged to make way for the vehicles which are coming nearer on the right. By the Same rule drivers of trams should be guided among themselves. I.e.  Z.Takim obrazom makes way,  passes the first (the remaining turn on the left), then passes To (at a noise on the right) and in conclusion of Z.Bulshit, aha. The variant with departure To on a crossroads by the way sounds was probablly and at first sight breaks nothing. But depends on overall dimensions of machines and the size of a crossroads.

8

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, IID, you wrote: IID>... At you it is right is? It is useless, it wooden on a belt - http://rsdn.org/forum/auto/7059317.1 the Author: BOBKA_XPEH Date: 19.02 23:04.

9

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

10

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, vsb, you wrote: vsb> In this situation there is nothing interesting. Intersection of equivalent roads it something from village where there go two machines a day. At a little active driving always put principal/minor (or a traffic light). And if the traffic light does not work? Or at you such does not happen? vsb> generally on my observations a problem of the Soviet formation of drivers in excessive attention to insignificant questions and silent lowering of the questions really essential. On  90 % of the questions which are not concerning to 90 % of driving. With what speed the bus with children on a country route, aha can go. Yes  to me, with what speed it there can go, I control the car. Or the questions fastened on knowledge of for how many meters what signs before Ry moving stand. Yes  to me, besides. Saw moving, passed by rules, that's all. Let  there  the read it, when put signs. With it it absolutely agree. Generally to select important from minor is and there is an experience.

11

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Image: 9.JPG About if to remove to nobody the necessary upper appendix of a crossroads it will be Vanguard street in SPb. However, the crossroads there on the area is more. https://goo.gl/maps/ofsobjMmpdD2 I there am regular in a machine role To I go round  behind and I dump in a decline on the affairs. When machines Z it is a lot of and to go round them behind it is impossible, somehow so it was died at this crossroads on that  voluntary pass machines from other directions. S> 1. How such situation is called? Or not titles?  S> 2. Whether there are other variants of locks? Here, when on the machine on each of roads - the situation is absolutely not solvable what rules, only a toss to throw. All is correct, analysis only in a manual mode. Who more impudently/whom is necessary more, that and passes earlier.

12

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, vsb, you wrote: vsb> In this situation there is nothing interesting. Intersection of equivalent roads it something from village where there go two machines a day. At a little active driving always put principal/minor (or a traffic light). I for 5 years faced journey of an equipotential crossroads  times and always it there was a world wrong side. A question is exceptional theoretical. Here the intersection of inadequate roads is really important subject. , call in to us for example in a city Pushkin...

13

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, BOBKA_XPEH, you wrote: BOB> to Shmzh listen here! BOB> Action 1. "To" leaves on a crossroads and passes "" which goes directly, at this time costs and does not twitch. BOB> action 2. "To" completes manoeuvre and releases a crossroads. BOB> action 3. Passes a crossroads. By the way, at you an error, at once at all did not read that wrote. I.e. cars pass a crossroads so: 1. Red leaves on a crossroads and waits 2. Yellow (after all on the right at it now anybody is not present) passes a crossroads 3. Then the crossroads passes green, 4. And only then the red completes crossroads journey. At you , To. And in driving school rules, , K.Otsjuda: http://autoschool-drive.dp.ua/podgotovk … estka.html And tell trifling matter.

14

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, , you wrote: Hello, Shmj, you wrote: 13.12. At turn on the left or a turn the driver  a vehicle is obliged to make way for vehicles, moving on equivalent road from a counter direction directly or to the right. By the Same rule drivers of trams should be guided among themselves. [/q]> from a counter direction> from a counter direction> Thus,  passes the first Thus,  is obliged to pass and does not go the first.

15

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, , you wrote: Thus,  passes the first (the remaining turn on the left), then passes To (at a noise on the right) and in conclusion of Z.Bolee the general rules work when the specialized do not approach. And here that the driving school writes: I.e. cars pass a crossroads so: 1. Red leaves on a crossroads and waits 2. Yellow (after all on the right at it now anybody is not present) passes a crossroads 3. Then the crossroads passes green, 4. And only then the red completes crossroads journey. http://autoschool-drive.dp.ua/podgotovk … estka.html at you , To. At driving school, , K.Poluchaetsja  yes - the majority do not know about this case.

16

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> At you , To. And at us in apartment gas. S> and in driving school rules, , K.Nu , only it not  that fact that the situation solvable and  here is not required. S> And tell trifling matter. Speak that in Moscow (it is forbidden in territory of life of Shmzhi) hens milk.

17

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, BOBKA_XPEH, you wrote: BOB> Well , only it not  that fact that the situation solvable and  here is not required. What ? That is all the same you do not know, and already you aspire to teach and  the fool? I did not speak what not the solvable.

18

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Such crossroads needs to be passed behind cent, instead of before it. A path To the wrong.

19

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, Muxa, you wrote: M> the Path To the wrong. It not a path and a direction for whom where it is necessary. A path in the following picture: you with whom agree: with our experts (, To, or with the driving school version (,)?

20

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, IID, you wrote: IID> This situation is considered in driving school. You with whom agree: with our experts (, To, or with the driving school version (,)?

21

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

S> It not a path and a direction for whom where it is necessary. A path in the following picture: S> Image: 10.JPG Machines not the material points. In the configuration resulted by you and a travel method hooks  on a part above, and  hooks below as they will need to go round K.Tut standing at center to even it is necessary to think that it is necessary to rise  on crossroads center that both  and had a possibility it to go round. In a reality so  someone does. S> you with whom agree: with our experts (, To, or with the driving school version (,)? Methods to part here a little, and all of them do not contradict the Russian traffic regulations.

22

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, Muxa, you wrote: S>> you with whom agree: with our experts (, To,) or with the driving school version (,)? M> Methods to part here a little, and all of them do not contradict the Russian traffic regulations. What? To is mandatory should leave on the middle and stop?

23

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, BOBKA_XPEH, you wrote: BOB> Shmzha is though that that in what you generally  except  and the fan?

24

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> That ? That is all the same you do not know, and already you aspire to teach and  the fool? The picture at you is so-so drawn... But the problem of the eaten away egg is not necessary that it here to consider or to investigate that there and as should , it is visible for 10 thousand miles and without instruments. I did not call you, and generally you our block whose-educator. It too is considered ? S> I did not speak what not the solvable. At you what not a problem that incapable of solution,  . You here to half of forum to it ate away a brain.

25

Re: About collisions of rules at a crossroads

Hello, BOBKA_XPEH, you wrote: BOB> the Picture at you is so-so drawn... But the problem of the eaten away egg is not necessary that it here to consider or to investigate that there and as should , it is visible for 10 thousand miles and without instruments. I did not call you, and generally you our block whose-educator. It too is considered ? It is drawn quite normally. Simply you gave failing response, most likely and go. And now it is a shame and as that want to round corners. But a word not a sparrow. BOB> . You here to half of forum to it ate away a brain. Want or not, and I invented the correct task which to me nobody could invent. Namely: to create the device, capable to feel  pains and pleasures.