1

Topic: Force of the link.

Greetings,  I here at a leisure. Also understood that at Google any link has weight. As the system shorted, means Google estimates any link as weight. The link from page to which nobody refers too has the minimum weight. That is if you make trillion links to any page and is simple  their Google you will be in chocolate! The idea is clear?

2

Re: Force of the link.

Hello, falcoware, you wrote: F> Also understood that at Google any link has weight. As the system shorted, means Google estimates any link as weight. To coordinate among themselves all terminology, it is necessary to recall that weight as force, it is equal to the mass increased by acceleration of the free falling and to apply to system conservation laws of mass, pulse, and in passing - and parities...

3

Re: Force of the link.

I eat> to coordinate among themselves all terminology, it is necessary to recall that weight as force, it is equal to the mass increased by acceleration of the free falling and to apply to system conservation laws of mass, pulse, and in passing - and parities... We Admit in the Internet only 2 sites with one page which refer against each other. Clearly Google does not deliver both pages PR10. For this purpose it is necessary billions links. The output - "the empty" link possesses weight. The logic is clear?

4

Re: Force of the link.

Hello, falcoware, you wrote: F> That is if you make trillion links to any page and it is simple  their Google you will be in chocolate! You simply joke or actually think there such stupid algorithm? At type forums https://www.searchengines.ru and  all these questions  assort in the image, make various experiments and try to guess a principle of operation of algorithm experimentally. As it is known, the algorithm of ranging Google stores in the strict secret is is a principal trade secret of the giant. Even working there in the core do not know anything about this algorithm.

5

Re: Force of the link.

Hello, falcoware, you wrote: F> the Idea is clear? All is correct, in initial algorithm to a pejdzh-wound. Its formula is published by Brin yes, all pages before the beginning of a cycle of recalculations receive some minimum weight. And yes,  links yes gives high  . But it is all partially  Google the filter of a variety of domains, etc. Nevertheless it still  Examples of giants risen on internal  fb.ru But now Google it partially  unlike  where partially it fb.ru is still high  that that bad, ,  p. do not get to an index i.e. in an ideal it is necessary 1 billion  the useful texts is it is impossible means simply 1  does not get into an index,  just by such filter are killed

6

Re: Force of the link.

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: F>> That is if you make trillion links to any page and it is simple  their Google you will be in chocolate! S> you simply joke or actually think there such stupid algorithm? Same already did, and worked. And, billion links sufficed, to me is remembered.

7

Re: Force of the link.

F> That is if you make trillion links to any page and it is simple  their Google you will be in chocolate! F> the idea is clear? It became outdated years as 10. Just then this principle also used, yet did not cover.

8

Re: Force of the link.

Hello, Sharowarsheg, you wrote: S> same already did, and worked. And, billion links sufficed, to me is remembered. In what year? Algorithm permanently improve. Links should be on sites with PR, and it costs money. There is a stock exchange of links - look at the prices.

9

Re: Force of the link.

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S>> same already did, and worked. And, billion links sufficed, to me is remembered. S> in what year? Algorithm permanently improve. In 2006, it seems. And since then algorithm permanently complicate, so holes becomes more and more.

10

Re: Force of the link.

Hello, Sharowarsheg, you wrote: S> in 2006, it seems. The grandma recalled as the maid was... S> And since then algorithm permanently complicate, so holes becomes more and more. If you are able to find holes - that SEO is not necessary for you, and so can receive ten thousand dollars.

11

Re: Force of the link.

Hello, falcoware, you wrote: Exhale, the beaver!

12

Re: Force of the link.

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S>> in 2006, it seems. S> the grandma Recalled as the maid was... If  present algorithm the same will quickly enough be found out PageRank which was 15 years ago. In the world not so it is a lot of geniuses who can invent something considerably new, and the majority of them is occupied in other spheres of activity. By and large, anything radical since as Google gobbled up , did not happen.

13

Re: Force of the link.

Hello, falcoware, you wrote: F> That is if you make trillion links to any page and it is simple  their Google you will be in chocolate! As far as I understand, it is called as retrieval spam. Searchers with it , moderately the ability.

14

Re: Force of the link.

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: F>> That is if you make trillion links to any page and it is simple  their Google you will be in chocolate! Pzz> as far as I understand, it is called as retrieval spam. Searchers with it , moderately the ability. In English, it is called Wikipedia.

15

Re: Force of the link.

Pzz> As far as I understand, it is called as retrieval spam. Searchers with it , moderately the ability. All right, I will show cards: http://falcoware.com/stats/awstats.pl I created millions dynamic subdomains. And now the traffic . Like 3 years flight normal. The traffic from Google  type: http://free-games-downloads.falcoware.c … lSkyHD.php

16

Re: Force of the link.

Hello, falcoware, you wrote: F> it is fine, I will show cards: http://falcoware.com/stats/awstats.pl F> I created millions dynamic subdomains. And now the traffic . Like 3 years flight normal. Well it is simple  a defect. Any  their searcher contains errors, including. They repair in due course it, do not worry.

17

Re: Force of the link.

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: F>> it is fine, I will show cards: http://falcoware.com/stats/awstats.pl F>> I created millions dynamic subdomains. And now the traffic . Like 3 years flight normal. Pzz> well it is simple  a defect. Any  their searcher contains errors, including. They repair in due course it, do not worry. The first time about this defect it was known about ten years ago. While they there repair, in bank money can come to an end.

18

Re: Force of the link.

Hello, falcoware, you wrote: F> I created millions dynamic subdomains. And now the traffic . Like 3 years flight normal. 5  visits from Google in a month

19

Re: Force of the link.

I> 5  visits from Google in a month Here even matter is not in volume, and millions links knock out in a top the projects in Futere.

20

Re: Force of the link.

I>> 5  visits from Google in a month F> Here even matter is not in volume, and millions links knock out in a top the projects in Futere. At you other reason. Behavior of users and proximity of this behavior to typical, on what  Google - context consumption, and at this time show to it of advertizing. Such behavior  is favourable also to Google and you. Therefore you in a top.  it does not threaten the majority.

21

Re: Force of the link.

R> At you other reason. Behavior of users and proximity of this behavior to typical, on what  Google - context consumption, and at this time show to it of advertizing. R> such behavior  is favourable also to Google and you. Therefore you in a top.  it does not threaten the majority. Well by the way, I can take  to beat out one in a top on one  free of charge, for the sake of the recommendation. Write in .