1

Topic: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

Instead of simply telling "this method of authentification - bad", they write "this method of authentification enough bad" or "this method of authentification insufficiently good" everywhere here such florid phrases and complications which leave a place for manoeuvre. That if that it was possible to tell in reply to someone's comment "yes, you are right, but I too told" insufficiently "good" or still: "now I to you will tell about X, and then I will tell to you about Y, and then about Z. And then..... Allow me to begin already. To me not . Well I begin..." Yes begin you already! Bothered with the preludes.

2

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

It not only programmers... It is a lot of where.

3

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

M> instead of simply telling "this method of authentification - bad", they write "this method of authentification enough bad" or "this method of authentification insufficiently good" M> everywhere here such florid phrases and complications which leave a place for manoeuvre. M> that if that it was possible to tell in reply to someone's comment "yes, you are right, but I too told" insufficiently "good" There is on this subject a known joke: - the Sonny, only the fool can state something categorically. The clever person always though slightly doubts. - the father, you are assured of it? - It is absolutely convinced! In general, in such phrase bad is not present anything. Not  one specifying word is a saving on matches. But if this word is present - at first, article will give less occasions to a flame. Secondly, the reader will trust more to this article (and differently the reader reasons somehow so: Time the author so thoughtlessly acts rashly - means, probably, he badly understands about what writes, and in article any )

4

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M> or still: "now I to you will tell about X, and then I will tell to you about Y, and then about Z. And then..... M> allow me to begin already. To me not . Well I begin..." Begin give, that you pull?!

5

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M> instead of simply telling "this method of authentification - bad", they write "this method of authentification enough bad" or "this method of authentification insufficiently good" M> everywhere here such florid phrases and complications which leave a place for manoeuvre. M> that if that it was possible to tell in reply to someone's comment "yes, you are right, but I too told" insufficiently "good" M> or still: "now I to you will tell about X, and then I will tell to you about Y, and then about Z. And then..... M> allow me to begin already. To me not . Well I begin..." M> yes begin you already! Bothered with the preludes. On  still greet with  and thank for , and for honor to have possibility to generate free of charge content

6

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

Hello, klopodav, you wrote: M>> instead of simply telling "this method of authentification - bad", they write "this method of authentification enough bad" or "this method of authentification insufficiently good" K> in general, in such phrase bad is not present anything. Not  one specifying word is a saving on matches. But if this word is present - at first, article will give less occasions to a flame. On the contrary, occasions to a flame will be more. It is necessary to clarify time and on always in what cases "enough" and in what "insufficiently". All l cases have been studied by the author in details, what cross impact on this method of authentification rendered a surrounding... K> Secondly, the reader will trust more to this article (and differently the reader reasons somehow so: time the author so thoughtlessly acts rashly - means, probably, he badly understands about what writes, and in article any ) the Same is not present. At the reader which reads in a head there is a filter appropriating "weight" to words, articles, authors much. Frequent (to please to a mode) usage of similar receptions reduces a trust and authority index. Authors "acting rashly" as a rule have higher index of trust, than authors is florid-tolerant.

7

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: > on  still greet with  and thank for , and for honor to have possibility to generate free of charge content Well, they , not a couple to us, mere mortals

8

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

...It is necessary to write article simply.

9

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M> yes begin you already! Bothered with the preludes. It you, probably, did not read  from what like Camera API from . And examples to them. You want to find an example of usage of it API, you receive 10 screens irrelevant  which can be exposed in spirit in  in department "as it is not necessary to write the asynchronous code".

10

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M> instead of simply telling "this method of authentification - bad", they write "this method of authentification enough bad" or "this method of authentification insufficiently good" M> everywhere here such florid phrases and complications which leave a place for manoeuvre. This post of bad.

11

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

Hello, IID, you wrote: IID> Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M>> instead of simply telling "this method of authentification - bad", they write "this method of authentification enough bad" or "this method of authentification insufficiently good" M>> everywhere here such florid phrases and complications which leave a place for manoeuvre. IID> this post of bad. I do not like your comment.

12

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M> everywhere here such florid phrases and complications which leave a place for manoeuvre. Some think that so they seem cleverer. All right speak, but in the code is still worse. Not on business  new features of language/frejmvorka is the main task not so clever .

13

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

M> instead of simply telling "this method of authentification - bad", they write "this method of authentification enough bad" or "this method of authentification insufficiently good" probably they understand that the world not the black-and-white

14

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M> everywhere here such florid phrases and complications which leave a place for manoeuvre. And still here so happens... The dude Writes for example article where compares /// (here to taste) X, Y and Z. Here I for example from such articles always wait an output: here it, it and it  - not , and here also that - all is amicable . Is not present, in the end only such output always will be written: well on taste and color all  different, to you to decide what to use! Charles, the felt-tip pens different! You on a horse-radish then it compared all? I.e. that to me for the purposes though  from enumerated , me it is necessary to check up and understand all it anew, what here this my felt-tip pen?

15

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M> instead of simply telling "this method of authentification - bad", they write "this method of authentification enough bad" or "this method of authentification insufficiently good" space for retreat

16

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

17

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

Hello, Dead Down, you wrote: > Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M>> everywhere here such florid phrases and complications which leave a place for manoeuvre. > And still here so happens... > the dude Writes for example article where compares /// (here to taste) X, Y and Z. Here I for example from such articles always wait an output: here it, it and it  - not , and here also that - all is amicable . Is not present, in the end only such output always will be written: well on taste and color all  different, to you to decide what to use! Charles, the felt-tip pens different! You on a horse-radish then it compared all? I.e. that to me for the purposes though  from enumerated , me it is necessary to check up and understand all it anew, what here this my felt-tip pen? +18300 and in the beginning write "now I will compare x, y and z and I will draw an output that from this it is better". And in the end - "and the horse-radish knows it! Something , something . That it is better for you use. I do not know that it is better for you!"

18

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M> instead of simply telling "this method of authentification - bad", they write "this method of authentification enough bad" or "this method of authentification insufficiently good" Because humanists write and in it pay for text kilobytes.

19

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M> everywhere here such florid phrases and complications which leave a place for manoeuvre. George Karlin - Polite Speech (rus sub)... <<RSDN@Home 1.3.108 alpha 5 rev. 56>>

20

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

Hello, landerhigh, you wrote: L> It you, probably, did not read  from what like Camera API from . And examples to them. You want to find an example of usage of it API, you receive 10 screens irrelevant  which can be exposed in spirit in  in department "as it is not necessary to write the asynchronous code". It is impossible. It is impossible on such to translate spirit.

21

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

So it was moved.

22

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M> instead of simply telling "this method of authentification - bad", they write "this method of authentification enough bad" or "this method of authentification insufficiently good" Because other programmers very much like to get to the bottom of insignificant trifles. A root to all painful

23

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

Hello, Muxa, you wrote: M>> instead of simply telling "this method of authentification - bad", they write "this method of authentification enough bad" or "this method of authentification insufficiently good" M> probably they understand that the world not black-and-white If "is not black-belost" in the technical text is important, it should be expressed in numbers, differently it is subjective appraisal not having  sense.

24

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M> and in the beginning write "now I will compare x, y and z and I will draw an output that from this it is better". M> and in the end - "and the horse-radish knows it! Something , something . That it is better for you use. I do not know that it is better for you!" Or reference: "high-grade comparing is beyond article"

25

Re: What for programmers complicate all, when write articles?

Hello, Dead Down, you wrote: > the dude Writes for example article where compares /// (here to taste) X, Y and Z. Here I for example from such articles always wait an output: here it, it and it  - not , and here also that - all is amicable . Is not present, in the end only such output always will be written: well on taste and color all  different, to you to decide what to use! And what for then to you the salary to pay? What can  the necessary article read its last paragraph and finish on it cogitative activity - much.