1

Topic: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

, subj

2

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, Los Chtostrjaslos, you wrote: > , subj Because the network  now in many  is more powerful than any of existing supercomputers.

3

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, Los Chtostrjaslos, you wrote: > , subj to begin with - on visible, personal supercomputers are not present and to make the decision "" simply organizational . Then it is already possible to ask a question how much it is favourable - I suspect that the price  at them not so small because of engineering costs (a supply, the cooling, convenient access to the equipment - for certain all it oh as  location cost). But it is gamble, I actually do not know and it would be interesting to learn.

4

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, Los Chtostrjaslos, you wrote: > , subj the Modern networks of farms on my concepts, on orders are more powerful than any  .

5

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Because the network  now in many  is more powerful than any of existing supercomputers. Clearly and it is possible with digits?

6

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, Los Chtostrjaslos, you wrote: > , subj/me thinks that for a long time already all  being covered SETI@home

7

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, Los Chtostrjaslos, you wrote: Probably because that who presumes to itself a supertoaster,  it is not so necessary.

8

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, Los Chtostrjaslos, you wrote: S>> Because the network  now in many  is more powerful than any of existing supercomputers. > it is clear > and it is possible with digits? NVidia let out P106-100 for . There are companies from the ~10000 farms, each farm is ~15 P106-100, everyone P106-100 is 3-4 . The fastest supercomputer now - Chinese, 93000 . P.S. A counter that supercomputers much more difficult devices, than a farm to which do not need to address to storage and to exchange the data between kernels.

9

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, Los Chtostrjaslos, you wrote: > , subj As I understand, the algorithm of calculation adaptive under capacities, the more capacities is used, the it is more difficult to find following .

10

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, B0FEE664, you wrote: BFE> As I understand, the algorithm of calculation adaptive under capacities, the more capacities is used, the it is more difficult to find following . Well then would cost though one   -  remaining

11

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, Nik, you wrote: N> NVidia let out P106-100 for . There are companies from the ~10000 farms, each farm is ~15 P106-100, everyone P106-100 is 3-4 . The fastest supercomputer now - Chinese, 93000 . And and here  when it is necessary to consider .

12

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, Los Chtostrjaslos, you wrote: BFE>> As I understand, the algorithm of calculation adaptive under capacities, the more capacities is used, the it is more difficult to find following . > well then would cost though one   -  remaining Adaptive is the reverse variant means also: it is less than computing powers - smaller complexity  should search.

13

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, B0FEE664, you wrote: BFE> Hello, Los Chtostrjaslos, you wrote: >> , subj BFE> As I understand, the algorithm of calculation adaptive under capacities, the more capacities is used, the it is more difficult to find following . Indeed, if hashes begin is faster the search criterion of a following hash if more slowly that becomes simpler criterion of a following correct hash becomes complicated. Thus some is supported average

14

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

https://lenta.ru/news/2018/02/08/sarov/

15

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, Nik, you wrote: N> the Modern networks of farms on my concepts, on orders are more powerful than any  . Aha, and the lightning is more powerful than any , here only from it one harm.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

16

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: N>> NVidia let out P106-100 for . There are companies from the ~10000 farms, each farm is ~15 P106-100, everyone P106-100 is 3-4 . The fastest supercomputer now - Chinese, 93000 . M> And and here  when it is necessary to consider . It is difficult to find  for supercomputers - for them it is the strange task.

17

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, CreatorCray, you wrote: N>> the Modern networks of farms on my concepts, on orders are more powerful than any  . CC> Aha, and the lightning is more powerful than any , here only from it one harm. I many times suggested to replace farms on  from the verified donation of money for medicine.

18

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, Nik, you wrote: N> I many times suggested to replace farms on  from the verified donation of money for medicine. To whom offered? Hands on what are given? Went into hoses, bought 10 packs of coffee - and do Only at you it does not turn out decentralisings and it will be interesting to nobody. Without decentralization  it is not necessary.

19

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

All this subject with " on farms" - analog of points of reception of nonferrous metals. In 90 agents of the NATO opened them in regions, and "the simple people" transformed into scrap metal and handed over there all industrial infrastructure which could reach - fences, wires, traffic signs, pipes, rails, devastating territory, causing failures, driving in the Stone Age without any input of peace insurgents. Now invented and implement the same, only for a numeral infrastructure.

20

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, Osaka, you wrote: O> All this subject with " on farms" - analog of points of reception of nonferrous metals. In 90 agents of the NATO opened them in regions And what now at you such points are not present? At us till now you will rarely meet the metal manhole, replace with the composite.

21

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

O>> All this subject with " on farms" - analog of points of reception of nonferrous metals. In 90 agents of the NATO opened them in regions S> And what now at you such points are not present? At us till now you will rarely meet the metal manhole, replace with the composite. Anyway, manholes not all .

22

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, Osaka, you wrote: O>>> All this subject with " on farms" - analog of points of reception of nonferrous metals. In 90 agents of the NATO opened them in regions S>> And what now at you such points are not present? At us till now you will rarely meet the metal manhole, replace with the composite. O> anyway, manholes not all . O> Image: 651431_original.jpg That is not the question. Why points only with a binding to 90? Really now at you them closed? Covers of manholes and at us can be found in central streets. And here on suburb - or composite or simply branches interpose into a hole that nobody failed.

23

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, Los Chtostrjaslos, you wrote: > , subj Because speed of emmission is restricted by time (1 unit for 10 minutes). Capacity adding simply increases complexity.

24

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, reversecode, you wrote: R> https://lenta.ru/news/2018/02/08/sarov/This news becomes more interesting with such title:

25

Re: Why supercomputers till now not all ?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> That is not the question. Why points only with a binding to 90? Really now at you them closed? Do not judge all countries of the world on ... S> Covers of manholes and at us can be found in central streets. And here on suburb - or composite or simply branches interpose into a hole that nobody failed. At once it is visible that the Suburb is a title of that country in which you live...