1

Topic: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

And let's look at whom the most beautiful IDE? Do notarially certified screenshots of the monitor in which you look half of day and add the story why you consider that it beautifully/conveniently.

2

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

3

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

Hello, Skorodum, you wrote: S> Actually QtCreator: S> Image: Screenshot from 2018-02-26 12-41-57.png S> Defoltnyj QtCreator c removed  mode switchings. 51 code line on the screen and almost any superfluous information (it would be desirable to remove still the upper line of the menu since to it never I use also the switch  an output below, but it is not implemented yet). S> the Dark subject least contrasts with the console and generally to me is pleasant. I can still  make (for example , an output of the compiler or git diff and git rebase-i). S> About features QtCreator the Author wrote here: Skorodum Date: 02.11.15. And why ?

4

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

Hello, Skorodum, you wrote: the esthetics Here is how looks

5

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

Hello, kov_serg, you wrote: _> the esthetics _> Image Here is how looks: D5w8Z91.png Symantec 7.5? I and did not understand in due time with it properly. Still Watcom from this series. However, spoke, the compiler at it fine. But all remaining...

6

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

Hello, Privalov, you wrote: P> Hello, kov_serg, you wrote: _>> the esthetics _>> Image Here is how looks: D5w8Z91.png P> Symantec 7.5? I and did not understand in due time with it properly. P> still Watcom from this series. However, spoke, the compiler at it fine. But all remaining... WATCOM the environment silent horror. The compiler too not the best, but brake. Zortec-> Symantec-> DigitalMats was the fastest on time of the assembly from all zoo.

7

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

8

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

Hello,/aka/, you wrote: A> mcedit in kitty, torn on all screen. Single line with the superfluous information - below assignment of F-keys, for life it already  in a brain, without it is uncomfortable. And the upper auxiliary line  is necessary, that file name, row number and so on. All remaining actions in the console? Integration with , gdb? A> Remaining - the code, 78 lines in large print. At me the font/masshtabirivanie means even more. At you vertically the monitor tear. A> it is a screenshot of all monitor. No other garbage on this monitor is present, and upper  the important gray line "iostream - Qt Creator" too is not present. At me too normally is not present, I while did "photosession" for some reason forgot to tear in all screen. A> [cut= 1080x1920] Oldskulno) S>> the Dark subject least contrasts with the console and generally to me is pleasant. A> eyes were contracted into a tubule from a coloring. Why? Quite ... Upd: Looked at yours  once again: At me much less contrast, IMHO A> Green @name in the comment so it is important to select? It, probably, support of comments in style Doxygen. At me normally such is not present, I such do not see.

9

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

Hello, kov_serg, you wrote: _> Hello, Skorodum, you wrote: _> the esthetics _> Image Here is how looks: D5w8Z91.png At me at some colleagues the Studio approximately as looks.

10

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

Hello, Skorodum! S> And let's look, at whom the most beautiful IDE? S> Do notarially certified screenshots of the monitor... VS6 (It is all screen, completely. A font - Andale Mono, 9pt / or 10?./) two More: http://files.rsdn.org/44396/WindowsAdjust.png http://files.rsdn.org/44396/FilesOpened.png Windows are aligned (not by a mouse): http://rsdn.org/forum/tools/3972574.flat the Author: SergeCpp Date: 25.09.10

11

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

Hello, Skorodum, you wrote: S> Defoltnyj QtCreator c removed  mode switchings. 51 code line on the screen and almost any superfluous information (it would be desirable to remove still the upper line of the menu since to it never I use also the switch  an output below, but it is not implemented yet). S> the Dark subject least contrasts with the console and generally to me is pleasant. I can still  make (for example , an output of the compiler or git diff and git rebase-i). Not so clearly what for you remove left  (by the way, and a tree of the project that at you too is not used or simply hid it for a screen?), if at you and so the half-screen on the right is empty. And so, at me something similar, except for small nuances (language Russian, a subject light, font Consolas, other colors of illumination etc.).

12

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

13

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

Hello, alex_public, you wrote: _> you are not so clear what for remove left  (by the way, and a tree of the project that at you too is not used or simply hid it for a screen?) it is not used. All through a locator (ctrl-K) and mode switching on hot keys. _> if at you and so the half-screen on the right is empty. At us in the code very long lines meet _> And so, at me something similar, except for small nuances (language Russian, a subject light, font Consolas, other colors of illumination etc.). And I as a dark subject tried, so simply fell in love

14

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

15

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

Hello, SergeCpp, you wrote: SC> Hello, Skorodum! SC> Windows are aligned (not by a mouse): SC> http://rsdn.org/forum/tools/3972574.flat the Author: SergeCpp Date: 25.09.10 Here still an esthetics

16

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

Hello, Muxa, you wrote: M> Image: 9f59b60d169675cdc8bc76f9bc93c65a.jpg Looks soundly. It is direct as HolyC

17

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

Hello, SergeCpp, you wrote: SC> Multi-Edit 7.0 DOS (I much in it wrote): SC> Image: C_ClockDevelopmentArrays.png it is interesting, and what for a font such cool?

18

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

V> it is interesting, and what for a font such cool? my_eyes.fnt

19

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

Hello, Videoman! SC>> Multi-Edit 7.0 DOS (I much in it wrote): SC>> Image: C_ClockDevelopmentArrays.png V> it is interesting, and what for a font such cool? http://files.rsdn.org/44396/DOS12X16.RAR

20

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

Hello, kov_serg! _> Here still an esthetics _> Image: rc8c4nh.png Yes, by the way, the Studio <= 5 in something noticeably is better 6 - integration with help, still there something, I much with 5 worked. Here it only hung quite often, something was necessary in the register there to subtilize (a branch any spoiled there).

21

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

Hello, Skorodum, you wrote: S> And let's look at whom the most beautiful IDE? S> Do notarially certified screenshots of the monitor in which you look half of day and add the story why you consider that it beautifully/conveniently. https://ibb.co/nD5Zvx - hardly  fonts also it will be beautiful.

22

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

Hello, SergeCpp, you wrote: SC> http://files.rsdn.org/44396/DOS12X16.RAR Thanks! And it is interesting, any OpenType similar to it is in the nature, to try?

23

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

Hello, Skorodum, you wrote: S> Do notarially certified screenshots of the monitor in which you look half of day and add the story why you consider that it beautifully/conveniently. I on operation look in XCode and it is awful.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

24

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

Hello, Videoman! SC>> http://files.rsdn.org/44396/DOS12X16.RAR V> Thanks! And it is interesting, any OpenType similar to it is in the nature, to try? I do not know. Perhaps there are conversion programs? Google writes that is: fon to opentype converter online

25

Re: [pics] [battle] the Aesthetics of yours IDE

Hello, iZEN, you wrote: ZEN> https://ibb.co/nD5Zvx ZEN> - hardly  fonts also it will be beautiful. Interesting. Quality of a picture very bad... Personal : too much the unnecessary information on the screen (I the adherent of information minimalism and purity