1

Topic: Table PC

2

Re: Table PC

Hello, Trotsky, you wrote: Image: d9a85b.jpg Even it means that the Windows are unnecessary))

3

Re: Table PC

Hello, Trotsky, you wrote: Image: d9a85b.jpg why on screen Xp

4

Re: Table PC

S> why on screen Xp "it is let out on October, 25th, 2001 and is development Windows 2000 Professional." It is quite possible that Gates had an access to the version to release. Tablet PC = a set of specifications announced in 2001 by Microsoft both there 2001 and here 2001, all converges. Even in Wikipedia same (but another) a picture with XP. Pay attention that on Gates a white divine shirt, and on Jobs a black demonic sweater. In it all business.

5

Re: Table PC

Hello, Trotsky, you wrote: Image: d9a85b.jpg it is not necessary to run ahead of a paracart. There are ideas to which the society simply did not grow. Many good ideas already now are, which in the future will be actual but while to very few people are interesting.

6

Re: Table PC

Hello, Sheridan, you wrote:> Image: d9a85b.jpg S> Even it means that Windows are unnecessary)) Hm, always considered that is not necessary to Apple with interfaces for alternatively presented.

7

Re: Table PC

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: S>> Even it means that Windows are unnecessary)) M> Hm, always considered that is not necessary to Apple with interfaces for alternatively presented. Well so uselessness of one does not cancel uselessness of the second

8

Re: Table PC

Hello, Trotsky, you wrote: Image: d9a85b.jpg it was necessary to wait a little. Selected a pad, more precisely, a hybrid on ten. And iPad - it is not necessary.

9

Re: Table PC

Hello, Trotsky, you wrote: Image: d9a85b.jpg Bill Gates's Tablet weighed more kilogram. She was very heavy for dragging with itself. Both very small operating time. And the screen on the sun it is not visible. I had here it: https://3dnews.ru/191753 it was impossible to use directly. Even under Linux. And here EEE PC it was pleasant to me much more. Though it and not a pad.

10

Re: Table PC

Hello, Tyomchik, you wrote: Those> the First : the screen is more, resolution is more, the matrix is better (IPS), time from a battery of 10 hours, easier, is more thin, frames are more thin, the software is initially designed under , inductive  a screen, shop of applications with thousand ready. I will add,  quitted during the moment, when there were widespread wireless networks (Wifi, a mobile Internet) so it was in a subject. And what it was possible to do with a tablet in 2000? Anything.

11

Re: Table PC

Hello, Trotsky, you wrote: Why "us. "? Pads on Windows were. But, at first, it was the previous generation of screens - here about it already told. Secondly, the operating time at those devices differs from the battery from  in times to the worst. In the third, the price there was absolutely another. In 2008 year I did management system by the scenic equipment for Russian theaters. I do not know, whether it is used till now, but 10 years ago we delivered this system in three Moscow and one Krasnoyarsk theater. And here in that system we used similar pads for control of the equipment. Everyone  the pad managed in 2000 dollars and holds a charge only about an hour. Jobs did not present anything in a revolutionary way new, but it made a pad humanly - easy, with well adapted for a pad , with the durable operating time from the battery and for the comprehensible price.

12

Re: Table PC

Hello, Sheridan, you wrote: S> Even it means that the Windows are unnecessary)) And what alternative? Well not Linux really?

13

Re: Table PC

Hello, Privalov, you wrote: S>> Even it means that the Windows are unnecessary)) P> And what alternative? Well not Linux really?  . , matter of course. You are more careful with hatred that, you  already behind each corner . It is A little more - personally starts to come. In general, , exhale more often...

14

Re: Table PC

Hello, Sheridan, you wrote: S> Tse . , matter of course. One my Vindovyj a gadget is better than two my Androidnyh. S> You are more careful with hatred that, you  already behind each corner . You think, in my smart and a pad it seems to me? And I thought, Android is one of Linux distribution kits. 4 kernels only for to call, half-seconds of a time delay at pushing virtual keys. It is often impossible to clarify the reason on which it exhausts all kernels on 100 % of loading and for a pair of clocks puts the accumulator. So it simply ascertaining of the fact.

15

Re: Table PC

Hello, Privalov, you wrote: S>> Tse . , matter of course. P> one my Vindovyj the gadget is better than two my Androidnyh. - Than ? - Luchshe, than my two Vedrovyh So? Or you will explain?)) S>> you are more careful with hatred that, you  already behind each corner . P> you Think, in my smart and a pad it seems to me? And I thought, Android is one of Linux distribution kits. 4 kernels only for to call, half-seconds of a time delay at pushing virtual keys. It is often impossible to clarify the reason on which it exhausts all kernels on 100 % of loading and for a pair of clocks puts the accumulator. So it simply ascertaining of the fact. At me such too happens, approximately once a month. In similar situations I recall what applications used. As a rule it is the browser with what  the active page,  (most  the client by the way).

16

Re: Table PC

Hello, Sheridan, you wrote: P>> One my Vindovyj the gadget is better than two my Androidnyh. S> S> - Than ? S> - Luchshe, than my two Vedrovyh S> So? S> Or you will explain?)) here it "than" you . I such did not write. I simply established the fact. S> at me such too happens, approximately once a month. In similar situations I recall what applications used. As a rule it is the browser with what  the active page,  (most  the client by the way). The selected See. In my opinion, this fine explanation, than one Vindovyj a gadget is better than two Vedroidnyh. To me, working with Vindovym, it is not necessary to recall anything. As I do not use on Vedroidnyh gadgets anything, except several messengers. My Vindovyj the device not without defects, but I did not guess them, and calculated. Also I can bypass.

17

Re: Table PC

Hello, Privalov, you wrote: P>>> One my Vindovyj the gadget is better than two my Androidnyh. S>> S>> - Than ? S>> - Luchshe, than my two Vedrovyh S>> So? S>> Or you will explain?) ) P> Here it "than" you . I such did not write. I simply established the fact. That is  all went under the citation. Apprx. S>> At me such too happens, approximately once a month. In similar situations I recall what applications used. As a rule it is the browser with what  the active page,  (most  the client by the way). P> the selected See. In my opinion, this fine explanation, than one Vindovyj a gadget is better than two Vedroidnyh. To me, working with Vindovym, it is not necessary to recall anything. As I do not use on Vedroidnyh gadgets anything, except several messengers. P> my Vindovyj the device not without defects, but I did not guess them, and calculated. Also I can bypass. And, that is to "recall" == to "guess".  a position, . To invent the term on the basis of its phrase of the interlocutor, to paste it in the phrase and to expose the contender in negative light. Give you of anything henceforth you will not invent, ? On a subject: Such at me here happens so rarely that I do not check each time of graphics of power consumption with layout on applications. I simply find a body the ungeared.

18

Re: Table PC

Hello, Sheridan, you wrote: S> That is  all went under the citation. Apprx. You it about what? Under what citation? Or at you again? S> And that is to "recall" == to "guess".  a position, . Almost. Storage periodically brings everybody. S> give you of anything henceforth you will not invent, ? There is nothing to object, therefore you selected such tactics? To you, by the way, it is possible to invent. "Than" you all the same itself added, and then still something there "under the citation". S> On a subject: such at me here happens so rarely that I do not check each time of graphics of power consumption with layout on applications. I simply find a body the ungeared. All the same something on a subject. Actually has no value, often it happens or not. Matters, it is how much easy to reveal the guilty. It is desirable regular means.

19

Re: Table PC

Hello, Privalov, you wrote: S>> That is  all went under the citation. Apprx. P> You it about what? Under what citation? Or at you again? It is very convenient to delete the citation and to ask "oh, about what you the citation?" I remind: P> One my Vindovyj the gadget is better than two my Androidnyh. - Than ? - Luchshe, than I assumed my two Vedrovyh that talk goes under this scenario. And happened S>> Give you of anything henceforth you will not invent, ? P> there is nothing to Object, therefore you selected such tactics? To you, by the way, it is possible to invent." Than "you all the same itself added, and then still something there" under the citation ". Nevertheless as I assumed - and it turned out S>> On a subject: such at me here happens so rarely that I do not check each time of graphics of power consumption with layout on applications. I simply find a body the ungeared. P> All the same something on a subject. Actually has no value, often it happens or not. Matters, it is how much easy to reveal the guilty. It is desirable regular means. In a bucket there is statistics of power consumption by applications. It is accessible at  on a battery in

20

Re: Table PC

Hello, Sheridan, you wrote: SS> I assumed that talk goes under this scenario. And there was In what place it happened? I see only one: your imaginations. "Than" you added itself. I similar did not do anything. Any who reads a branch will be convinced of it. And, certainly, it is convenient you, that talk went under your scenario. "If at fish wool grew, in it fleas" would be found. Thus itself basically explained, than   it is better than two . S> Nevertheless as I assumed - and you turned out the Second time about something that turned out. You there assumed something. And at once decided that all happened in a reality. Not that it strained me. It is simply uninteresting. S> in a bucket there is statistics of power consumption by applications. It is accessible at  on a battery in  Well is. But power consumption - is far not the only thing about what it would be desirable to know.

21

Re: Table PC

Hello, Privalov, you wrote: P> Well is. But power consumption - is far not the only thing about what it would be desirable to know. Well so do not weary, tell. Telepathy at me especially is not pumped over.

22

Re: Table PC

Hello, Sheridan, you wrote: S>>> Even it means that Windows are unnecessary)) M>> Hm, always considered that is not necessary to Apple with interfaces for alternatively presented. S> well so uselessness of one does not cancel uselessness of the second So  from it konsolno-orientirovannostju too for alternatively presented (though here now from it I write, because of absence of the best alternatives - the Windows brake out of the blue, and at  the interface inconvenient and  crookedly works, and it is necessary to buy the present iron, money to spend).