1

Topic: again deceived

Putin declared, what the USA "roughly and impudently" deceived the Russian Federation in a situation with state revolution in Ukraine yes how many it is already possible? Artful  again deceived trustful

2

Re: again deceived

Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: > artful  again deceived trustful  It is not accepted to say lies roughly at such level. The deceit drops at once authority and changes relations, who is rare to it aspires. Americans went, it is their choice. You for what purpose threw, to feel ashamed? It certainly your right though I such do not understand. Let Americans are ashamed.

3

Re: again deceived

Hello, Ziaw, you wrote: Z> You for what purpose threw, to feel ashamed? It certainly your right though I such do not understand. Let Americans are ashamed. And suddenly Pu it invented all

4

Re: again deceived

Hello, Ejnstok Fajr, you wrote: > There nearby still the second news is that to  about association of Crimea pushed exterior forces. Well means precisely says lies

5

Re: again deceived

Hello, Ziaw, you wrote: Z> It is not accepted to say lies roughly at such level. The deceit drops at once authority and changes relations, who is rare to it aspires. Americans went, it is their choice. From article not so clearly in what there was a deceit. In it there are two points: 1. Americans asked to persuade Yanukovych not to apply army. 2. Next day revolution has been made. Absolutely not clearly, as the request it is possible to deceive. Yes, asked, and exactly on purpose to have time to make revolution. In Turkey here then did not quit. And if someone for some reason decided that for something another he is an idiot. Other question that there, as usual, politicians bit the journalist, and any promises were, someone from  even was the guarantor of any contract whom at once and broke. But here it is necessary to understand that  - masters of the word when want - give, when want - take away. And at them rules are, for example, if fingers a dagger held, promises at all are not considered. It is impossible, as children small, all time to them to trust. Well and aloud to take offense on  in their world - a shame and weakness to that  and was glad.

6

Re: again deceived

Hello, Maniacal, you wrote: M> Four years ago it not "again" But we again admitted it, means, again ! Do not select a sugar candy at , they have nothing to rejoice more.

7

Re: again deceived

Hello, cures, you wrote: a C> From article not so clearly in what there was a deceit. In it there are two points: Here it is not mandatory, that it was clear to any fool or, for example, to court in London. There is enough, that it was clear to the government of the Russian Federation. What sources are necessary authentically to learn, what the government of the Russian Federation understands it?

8

Re: again deceived

Hello, cures, you wrote: Cs> But we again admitted it, means, again ! A C> do not select a sugar candy at , they have nothing to rejoice more. One racers who roughly rejoiced that can steal gas and already not repay debts approached to an understanding stage that this pleasure is completely not free. Surrenders to me and the USA not absolutely truly then estimated the  losses.

9

Re: again deceived

Hello, , you wrote: >> There nearby still the second news is that to  about association of Crimea pushed exterior forces. > well means precisely says lies Why? Voices in a head it too to some extent exterior forces.

10

Re: again deceived

Hello, Ziaw, you wrote: Z> Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: >> artful  again deceived trustful  Z> It is not accepted to say lies roughly at such level. The deceit drops at once authority and changes relations, who is rare to it aspires. Americans went, it is their choice. Z> you for what purpose threw, to feel ashamed? It certainly your right though I such do not understand. Let Americans are ashamed. Like everyone the inhabitant  knows what to trust Americans it is impossible and here the most important so

11

Re: again deceived

Hello, Ziaw, you wrote: Z> Here it is not mandatory, that it was clear to any fool or, for example, to court in London. There is enough, that it was clear to the government of the Russian Federation. What sources are necessary authentically to learn, what the government of the Russian Federation understands it? It (in what there was a deceit) from article not clearly personally to me, the government hardly will read that article. Or you interests, whether understands the government of the Russian Federation, what  - masters of the word? Here from interview of its head, as well as from its many actions before, it is obvious that does not understand and does not want to understand, it is very unpleasant to recognize it that many years behaved as the idiot. Z> one racers who roughly rejoiced that can steal gas and already not repay debts approached to an understanding stage that this pleasure is completely not free. Very much the other way, now their this pleasure was confirmed with one of the most tolerant courts in the world. So still smoke tire covers. Z> Surrenders to me and the USA not absolutely truly then estimated the  losses. Is not present at the USA any  losses. All their reputation already very much is under construction for a long time on their army and fleet which from it did not lose anything, and, on the contrary, acquired on the Antirussian hysterics.  their suckers at all do not excite. Here the choice in presidents of the moron which in a hysterics for the son-in-law inflicted steel sanctions on Europe, in the long term can weaken slightly them, but is hardly strong.

12

Re: again deceived

Hello, cures, you wrote: a C> From article not so clearly in what there was a deceit. In it there are two points: a C> 1. Americans asked to persuade Yanukovych not to apply army. A C> 2. Next day revolution has been made. A C> it is absolutely not clear, how the request it is possible to deceive. Yes, asked, and exactly on purpose to have time to make revolution. All there is clear. The agreement between Yanukovych and opposition where the compromise position registered has been signed world. The USA requested the Russian Federation to affect Yanukovych that it adhered to this agreement and the opposition of type will adhere too. However the opposition instead of adhering to the agreement led revolution. The USA thus did not begin to apologize in the spirit of "well we such did not want, is simple so quitted", and joyfully perceived it as due. I.e. showed that the request they simply impudently and cynically substituted the Russian Federation. But follows from this that any diplomatic arrangements from the USA have no big sense - throw again at the first possibility. It is sad.

13

Re: again deceived

Hello, Ziaw, you wrote: Z> It is not accepted to say lies roughly at such level. The deceit drops at once authority and changes relations, who is rare to it aspires. Americans went, it is their choice. Z> you for what purpose threw, to feel ashamed? It certainly your right though I such do not understand. Let Americans are ashamed. To what exactly in your answer smiled Abalak?... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

14

Re: again deceived

Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: > like everyone the inhabitant  knows what to trust Americans Cho seriously is impossible? > and here the most important so  And why ? It is unlikely that he strongly wanted to enter army and to rescue Yanukovych.

15

Re: again deceived

Hello, Rhino, you wrote: Z>> You for what purpose threw, to feel ashamed? It certainly your right though I such do not understand. Let Americans are ashamed. R> to what exactly in your answer smiled Abalak? Smile here to that as a certain aged citizen floods  about that that it say can twist-twirl presidents and armies of the adjacent sovereign countries and as say Americans (sic!) asked it to twist-twirl.

16

Re: again deceived

Hello, Rhino, you wrote: R> to What exactly in your answer smiled Abalak? Well he will not be ashamed of type probably Dexterously so at one stroke and Ukraine destroyed also Putin deceived,  here to be ashamed, it is such syllogism in geopolitical game was.

17

Re: again deceived

Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: > Putin declared, what the USA "roughly and impudently" deceived the Russian Federation in a situation with state revolution in Ukraine > yes how many it is already possible? > artful  again deceived trustful  Any ... And if Americans did not ask, great Putin would send all Ukrainian armies on crowd and would process the people in cutlets? It it is real in it admits?

18

Re: again deceived

Hello, cures, you wrote: the C> It (in what there was a deceit) from article not clearly personally to me, hardly that article will read the government. The C> Or you interests, whether understands the government of the Russian Federation, what  - masters of the word? Here from interview of its head, as well as from its many actions before, it is obvious that does not understand and does not want to understand, it is very unpleasant to recognize it that many years behaved as the idiot. Well here I recall the Russian Federation before the Ukrainian crisis and the Russian Federation now and I understand that crisis explicitly did the country good. For us it would be better, if then supported Yanukovych? I have doubts. The C> Very much the other way, now their this pleasure confirmed one of the most tolerant courts in the world. So still smoke tire covers. Matter is not in pleasure. What difference how many they will rejoice and smoke still tire covers? Payment all the same comes. The C> Is not present at the USA any  losses. All their reputation already very much is under construction for a long time on their army and fleet which from it did not lose anything, and, on the contrary, acquired on the Antirussian hysterics.  their suckers at all do not excite. The C> Here a choice in presidents of the moron which in a hysterics for the son-in-law inflicted steel sanctions on Europe, in the long term can weaken slightly them, but is hardly strong.  suckers and disturbance of Americans it is any strange terms. For example, I do not understand about what you speak, what difference who takes offense, and who worries? On what it influences? Disturbance of Americans can affect what processes at least in the theory about someone's insults?

19

Re: again deceived

Hello, GlebZ, you wrote: GZ> Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: >> Putin declared, what the USA "roughly and impudently" deceived the Russian Federation in a situation with state revolution in Ukraine >> yes how many it is already possible? >> artful  again deceived trustful  GZ> Any ... And if Americans did not ask, great Putin would send all Ukrainian armies on crowd and would process the people in cutlets? It it is real in it admits? The person 200 in  would dress up and they in a moment would clear away a Maidan

20

Re: again deceived

Hello, GlebZ, you wrote: GZ> Any ... And if Americans did not ask, great Putin would send all Ukrainian armies on crowd and would process the people in cutlets? It it is real in it admits? Well it if to read on Glebzovski. Putin speaks - we (as well as everywhere) worked over processes of peaceful settlement of the conflict. Americans too declared such operation. But when declarations and results of operation of Americans dispersed in the opposite sides, Americans let know that declarations were false initially. Here tell, how you manage to see "great Putin would send all Ukrainian armies on crowd and would process the people". At you any terrible interpreter of sense in a head.

21

Re: again deceived

Hello, fmiracle, you wrote: F> All there is clear. The agreement between Yanukovych and opposition where the compromise position registered has been signed world. The USA requested the Russian Federation to affect Yanukovych that it adhered to this agreement and the opposition of type will adhere too. However the opposition instead of adhering to the agreement led revolution. Strange, for opposition they could not give the promise, same other people. Theoretically, they could promise to influence somehow them, but about such I anywhere did not hear. They there like would be as witnesses of the inference of this agreement that then any of the sides could not tell that was nothing. But warranties like any would not give, and even mum did not swear. And where generally that or about agreements in article? F> the USA thus did not begin to apologize in the spirit of "well we such did not want, is simple so quitted", and joyfully perceived it as due. Certainly, did not become, already the sense was not to say lies, it was obvious, what exactly they and wanted it. F> I.e. showed that the request they simply impudently and cynically substituted the Russian Federation. Well it is impossible to substitute the request! They asked Putin to operate against interests of Russia, that what for fulfilled this request, most likely - without noting a dirty trick, they naturally were delighted. F> but follows from this that any diplomatic arrangements from the USA have no big sense - is thrown again at the first possibility. From this - in any way does not follow, here about arrangements generally words. But they and easily broke off before arrangements, as soon as considered their unprofitable for itself. The Same contracts about reduction of armaments. F> it is sad. Well, it is life. Only it is not clear, what for to you about it to mourn. On idea, the impossibility to incur the obligation which then you will fulfill even if it does not want, first of all is unprofitable to the subject. But, at first, it is important in the core for feeble, and Americans those are not for a long time. And secondly, take obligations one governors, with the purposes, and it should to fulfill them absolutely another that complicates to the people possibility (let and illusive) to change a policy of the country. So to fulfill the promises extremely , it is destiny of despots and tyrants.

22

Re: again deceived

Hello, , you wrote: > It whistles. > if to what it also was ready, so it to dress up  in the form of a golden eagle and to arrange instead of a Maidan . The golden eagle and itself with crowd of street muggers would consult, if to it produced the weapon and allowed it to apply.

23

Re: again deceived

Hello, cures, you wrote: the C> Well cannot be substituted the request! They asked Putin to operate against interests of Russia, that what for fulfilled this request, most likely - without noting a dirty trick, they naturally were delighted. It is called "diplomacy". Even with Turks, for example, as it was clarified, it is possible for it to use. "We each other respect interests, but we can agree. Here you will a little concede to me, there I will a little concede to you - to both it will be better as a whole", and from the USA, it turns out so it is impossible. Probably they too think for a long time in a channel "who more strongly, that and the rights, and we here of explicitly strongest" so differently already and cannot. There is a judgement that after disorder of the USSR diplomacy in the USA is fair  because already type and there is no need. Well, we have a look, as it quits While it turns out that a unique effective method to communicate from the USA is by the current moment to show new samples of rockets and planes. Here only it grieves me somehow

24

Re: again deceived

Hello, , you wrote: M>> the Golden eagle and itself with crowd of street muggers would consult, if to it produced the weapon and allowed it to apply. > against a half-million of the embittered street muggers? A front sight cut against billion. With . From blackwater. Under cover of an aircraft carrier of a class a destroyer

25

Re: again deceived

Hello, , you wrote: >  you , on a Maidan on peak quitted  to the people. It is the medical fact the Power dethroned one and a half thousand street muggers with the weapon from weapon polices from Lvov.  the people it was just agree with peace preschedule re-elections of the president in December, 2014.