Topic: Trust to results of Choices 2018
Some companions admit doubt, in correspondence, between the thrown citizens bulletins, and result of voting by polling district, municipal union, to region etc. Perturbs, when it is necessary to hear:" What there to walk? All the same 70-80 draw. Not because _. That is why that heads of various administrations, do not have desire, faintly to look, against remaining. (With result 20-30) "(it is good that fair people on administrations work. On which the country keeps) On my surprise how such generally can be?! (Bulletins are thrown, signatures in obtaining are collected) Received the answer: very simply. - there is some percent not voting (we undersign - it is marked) - And-or, mark in bulletins of remaining candidates, some ticks. Total Why not to print bulletins with a unique QR-code / a bar code. (That for which reading, the equipment is most spread) And after elections to publish a database with records: (Completely which, everyone can download) 3e2mX46niRVRY6uuFdzJ2XgZFaAFwv9AsR - 7 uFdzJwv9AsR2XgZFaAF3e2mX46niRVRY6u - 2 RY6uu3e2mX46niRVwv9AsRFdzJ2XgZFaAF - 7 where the second digit - number of the candidate in the list (for example, 2 - Zhirinovsky V. V, 7 - Putin V. V) To election committees it is not strong to consider, all of them it is equal on piles decompose. But, any can check up, how its voice is considered. Without knowing, thus, who as voted. Choices will be much more transparent. And it is more convincing. As citizens (who will have doubts), will track that there were no violations, and their voice coincided with that as they voted. In a case, disagreements, always it is possible to lift the bulletin, and to be convinced as there ticks stand. From the closed (strategic/confidential) information only exact number of citizens. Even without any communication with the place of residence, age etc. At cost, not strongly is more expensive than, to equip each section with web-chambers. Why so not to make? In what there can be complexities? In what there can be feeble places (leaving possibility for influence on results hostile hackers)? In what there can be feeble places (happening of disorder, the general computer illiteracy)?