1

Topic: Nazi Poland did not transit

2

Re: Nazi Poland did not transit

I suggest to expose to Poland the account for violation of the decision of the Parisian conference of 1919 about eastern frontier of Poland in the area of Kerzona and occupation and annexation of territories  it with 1919 for 1939 (it is territory of the modern Belarus, Lithuania, Ukraine) because of which there were Soviet-Polish wars 20 years, including war for clearing of Ukraine (for in 1920 Poles  it up to Slavyansk). Actually on this territory that Poland annexed, in 1939 the USSR later 17 days after Germany attacked Poland entered, next day, after the Polish statehood ceased to exist, and the authorities officially abandoned the country. As Czechoslovakia can expose to Poland the account for involvement in joint with Germany section of Czechoslovakia in 1938...

3

Re: Nazi Poland did not transit

Hello, Bjorn Skalpe, you wrote: BS> I Suggest to expose to Poland the account for violation of the decision of the Parisian conference And for Lzhelmitriev it would be necessary to settle up. And for partnership in Napoleonic aggression.

4

Re: Nazi Poland did not transit

B> And for partnership in Napoleonic aggression. For it they settled up statehood loss for 100 years.

5

Re: Nazi Poland did not transit

B> And for Lzhelmitriev it would be necessary to settle up. Precisely. And for Marina Mnishek!

6

Re: Nazi Poland did not transit

Hello, Bjorn Skalpe, you wrote: BS> For it they settled up statehood loss for 100 years. But how many the Russian empire  means to Poland. It would be necessary to return .

7

Re: Nazi Poland did not transit

Hello, Nik, you wrote: N> Eventually, the Reich manual recognized that attempts to put diplomatic pressure upon Warsaw are ineffective, and unique alternative to destruction or deportation of German minority and blockade of Danzig and East Prussia there is a war. As since July, 1939 Poles began boundary provocations, gunning at German settlements. Whence such bent for  actions of nazis?