1

Topic: With pleasure I watch this

From 11:55 https://youtu.be/mWSOCIwOp9Q? t=715

2

Re: With pleasure I watch this

Hello, ollv, you wrote: O> from 11:55 O> https://youtu.be/mWSOCIwOp9Q? t=715 That there?

3

Re: With pleasure I watch this

Hello, ollv, you wrote: O> from 11:55 O> https://youtu.be/mWSOCIwOp9Q? t=715 I do not understand, for what a minus, quite competently all painted

4

Re: With pleasure I watch this

Hello, wl., you wrote: O>> from 11:55 O>> https://youtu.be/mWSOCIwOp9Q? t=715 wl.> I do not understand, for what a minus,  competently all painted For "" in title?

5

Re: With pleasure I watch this

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> Hello, wl., you wrote: O>>> from 11:55 O>>> https://youtu.be/mWSOCIwOp9Q? t=715 wl.>> I do not understand, for what a minus,  competently all painted M> For "" in title? And can for a subject at putting a minus?

6

Re: With pleasure I watch this

Hello, solarwind, you wrote: S> That there?  is not present. The person gives interview and tells as is short-sighted itself Ukraine in a gas question conducts.

7

Re: With pleasure I watch this

Hello, rFLY, you wrote: FLY> Hello, solarwind, you wrote: S>> That there? FLY> Batherta is not present. The person gives interview and tells as is short-sighted itself Ukraine in a gas question conducts. It is simple because you inattentively look, and can is simple not  a sign from the leader. Such "intellectual" - the wife of the diplomat. Quite ill with russophobia, it is always interesting to me to look as it  Dzhangirov, but it it is soft, Pogrebinsky once declaring that it Russian so on this channel more and did not appear (I do not know, on how many it is connected to the given fact, but  I it more there did not see). Here,  on the person, such rupture of a template, especially after the expression into the account of deliveries of the liquefied gas from Russia in states))

8

Re: With pleasure I watch this

Hello, ollv, you wrote: wl.>>> I do not understand, for what a minus,  competently all painted M>> For "" in title? O> and can for a subject at putting a minus? I think, it not so

9

Re: With pleasure I watch this

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> Hello, ollv, you wrote: wl.>>>> I do not understand, for what a minus,  competently all painted M>>> For "" in title? O>> and can for a subject at putting a minus? M> I think, it not so to Think it - well, and that the main thing - is safe. And on a minus always it is possible to suppose to look philosophically, words of one well-known lady "an ass are recalled is, and the word is not present?"

10

Re: With pleasure I watch this

Hello, ollv, you wrote: wl.>>>>> I do not understand, for what a minus,  competently all painted M>>>> For "" in title? O>>> and can for a subject at putting a minus? M>> I think, it not so O> to Think it - well, and that the main thing - is safe. And on a minus always it is possible to suppose to look philosophically, O> words of one well-known lady "an ass are recalled is, and the word is not present?" And and here that lady? To show the ? You still would joke that: "to think is it is useful", "about, and you are able to think?" Or in this spirit. Generally would cut off In initial  pepper quite easy and sensibly argues on a current situation with gas in Ukraine.  at it any is not present.  was probably at you (you like a topic a starter) when you created a topic with such title. My detector of yellowness of title is adjusted roughly enough, and to the such does not react, but I admitted that at someone it is adjusted is more thin, and worked, about what wrote. To you, probably,  everywhere seem, and you solved  with me on this subject.

11

Re: With pleasure I watch this

Hello, ollv, you wrote: O> it is simple because you inattentively look, and can is simple not  a sign from the leader. Such "intellectual" - the wife of the diplomat. Quite ill with russophobia, O> it is always interesting to me to look as it  Dzhangirov, but it it is soft, Pogrebinsky once declaring that it Russian so on this channel more and did not appear (I do not know, on how many it is connected to the given fact, but  I it more there did not see). Here,  on the person, such rupture of a template, especially after the expression into the account of deliveries of the liquefied gas from Russia in states)) Excuse, I did not understand, at whom there  it was necessary to look out. I suggest to consider our discussion completed. Next time, if you please, outline with a considerable quantity of particulars

12

Re: With pleasure I watch this

The HARDWARE meant the leader see above.

13

Re: With pleasure I watch this

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> Hello, ollv, you wrote: wl.>>>>>> I do not understand, for what a minus,  competently all painted M>>>>> For "" in title? O>>>> and can for a subject at putting a minus? M>>> I think, it not so O>> to Think it - well, and that the main thing - is safe. And on a minus always it is possible to suppose to look philosophically, O>> words of one well-known lady "an ass are recalled is, and the word is not present?" M> And and here that lady? To show the ? M> You still would joke that: "to think is it is useful", "about, and you are able to think?" Or in this spirit. Generally would cut off oh well forgive. A backlog. Was superfluous probably. M> In initial  pepper quite easy and sensibly argues on a current situation with gas in Ukraine.  at it any is not present.  was probably at you (you like a topic a starter) when you created a topic with such title. Well there, yes about the leader. M> my detector of yellowness of title is adjusted roughly enough, and to the such does not react, but I admitted that at someone it is adjusted is more thin, and worked, about what wrote. To you, probably,  everywhere seem, and you solved  with me on this subject. Yes it is fine, not so it is important, as  something other that is in real surrounding me  where may be closing of schools on "some period", epidemic of a various flu, I so understand arising because of a lack of heating of apartments, and any murders your cousin . And it , also touches immediately. Think I is susceptible to a title of topics, or to. Well to what? Did not specify and - I am sorry, perceive it as the insider information from the big boat in which plague epidemic in a heat. And. And all.

14

Re: With pleasure I watch this

Hello, ollv, you wrote: M>> And and here that lady? To show the ? M>> You still would joke that: "to think is it is useful", "about, and you are able to think?" Or in this spirit. Generally would cut off O> oh well forgive. A backlog. Was superfluous probably. Yes did not touch. I had a thought that the phrase should be formulated without I "think", because it is the first hook for , but I did not listen to it M>> In initial  pepper quite easy and sensibly argues on a current situation with gas in Ukraine.  at it any is not present.  was probably at you (you like a topic a starter) when you created a topic with such title. O> well there, yes about the leader. Well, that I viewed - yes, conducting not all is pleasant, it is sensitive , but  especially it is not visible, either I did not look through, or I do not know this leader. Then would give references on specific  O> Yes all right, not so it is important, as  something other that is in real surrounding me  where may be closing of schools on "some period", epidemic of a various flu, I so understand arising because of a lack of heating of apartments, and any murders your cousin . O> And it , also touches immediately. Think I is susceptible to a title of topics, or to. Well to what? Did not specify and - I am sorry, perceive it as the insider information from the big boat in which plague epidemic in a heat. And. And all. It is just necessary to specify that to what, the comment to add. It is irrespectively given topic, all outlining . And you then sit, search  in the sentry . Feel sorry for readers, the Lord outlining And , I remember that you quite adequate. Though, I do not remember, what you were on a Maidan wave. Here about the Elk - I remember, it jumped up, and about you - I do not remember. And to search - laziness

15

Re: With pleasure I watch this

Hello, ollv, you wrote: O> it is simple because you inattentively look, and can is simple not  a sign from the leader. Such "intellectual" - the wife of the diplomat. Quite ill with russophobia If she really was ill with russophobia first of all would cease to invite Dzhangirova, Pogrebinsky, Marunicha, Menendesa and other "agents of influence of Moscow". And they from the channel not . (Pogrebinsky appears again, I do not doubt).

16

Re: With pleasure I watch this

Hello, wl., you wrote: wl.> I do not understand, for what a minus,  competently all painted For the bare link without .

17

Re: With pleasure I watch this

Hello, ollv, you wrote: O> from 11:55 O> https://youtu.be/mWSOCIwOp9Q? t=715 Personally I delivered a minus for the link to hour video without any description.

18

Re: With pleasure I watch this

Hello, ollv, you wrote: O> from 11:55 O> https://youtu.be/mWSOCIwOp9Q? t=715 at it even a manner of speech and a mimicry how at Dzhangirova them specially such select?

19

Re: With pleasure I watch this

Hello, alexsmirnoff, you wrote: A> Hello, ollv, you wrote: O>> it is simple because you inattentively look, and can is simple not  a sign from the leader. Such "intellectual" - the wife of the diplomat. Quite ill with russophobia A> If she really was ill with russophobia first of all would cease to invite Dzhangirova, Pogrebinsky, Marunicha, Menendesa and other "agents of influence of Moscow". A> And they from the channel not . Yes there very many people not , and these characters including https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zv5rvaXG4fw https://youtu.be/dFUXowq-7AY? t=5831 https://youtu.be/mgpx2uFcCMU? t=940 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFUXowq-7AY Any Portnikovy with whom at it a consensus similar (unlike Pogrebinsky) it is clear that she tries to observe a neutrality, but from it is not not present, and jumps something anomalous. But it is necessary to understand that if it will not invite such as , and others capable to an adequate situation assessment, its channel will be necessary to nobody. Sense to listen to what flows from all ? Its difference the such soft form , when there is no is not present and tell that a pier Russian slaves, they occupied Ukrainians,)) I such met. Putin clearly who - the unambiguous harm,  - an aggressor, all under the standard. But here is how more low at it it is shown. And that here such if in region where without exception all speak Russian to start to bend through a knee and to force to use a speech. https://youtu.be/mgpx2uFcCMU? t=981 A> (Pogrebinsky appears again, I do not doubt). Can be, I do not know. Generally long it already there not .

20

Re: With pleasure I watch this

Hello, Kerk, you wrote: K> Hello, ollv, you wrote: O>> from 11:55 O>> https://youtu.be/mWSOCIwOp9Q? t=715 K> Personally I delivered a minus for the link to hour video without any description. And four  with  not ?

21

Re: With pleasure I watch this

Hello, neFormal, you wrote: F> Hello, ollv, you wrote: O>> from 11:55 O>> https://youtu.be/mWSOCIwOp9Q? t=715 F> at it even a manner of speech and a mimicry how at Dzhangirova F> them specially such select? I too noted it. I think it imitates, such things have property to stick.