1

Topic: Reliable suppliers

Earlier "Gazprom" officially notified "Naftogaz" on the beginning of procedure of cancellation of contracts through the Stockholm arbitration. According to Alexey Miller's preboard "Gazprom", the company intends to terminate two contracts - on transit of gas and on its deliveries in the country. "Gazprom" declared that terminates all contracts with "Naftogazom" on March, 2nd. Such decision was accepted after on February, 28th the arbitration of the Chamber of commerce of Stockholm obliged "Gazprom" to pay to "Naftogazu" of $4,6  for short shipment of transit gas. According to other decision, Ukraine should transfer to the Russian company $2 billion Thus, "Gazprom" owes to 2,56 billion https://www.novayagazeta.ru/news/2018/0 … -naftogaza Effective managers led by itself once again all again  and started to shoot to itself at a knee. The epoch  proceeds.

2

Re: Reliable suppliers

Hello, GlebZ, you wrote: GZ> Effective managers led by itself once again all again  also started to shoot to themselves at a knee. The epoch  proceeds. And in what shooting in a knee consists?

3

Re: Reliable suppliers

Hello, GlebZ, you wrote: GZ> Effective managers led by itself once again all again  also started to shoot to themselves at a knee. The epoch  proceeds. That for delirium? Here entered into EU power packets - Poles in opened wrote, how they threw , forced to reconsider contracts, etc. Here  once again throw, is boundless impudently. I.e. it is not so simple , and the complete outrage is created. And on flasque and passively vile responses  - such aggressive attacks?

4

Re: Reliable suppliers

GZ> Effective managers led by itself once again all again  also started to shoot to themselves at a knee. The epoch  proceeds. I, by the way, am not assured that reviewing about contract cancellation transits faster, than the contract effuses. But some write that thus there can be a moratorium on mutual payments under the contract. I.e. then it quite to itself a lawful method to postpone payment across the last Stockholm.

5

Re: Reliable suppliers

Hello, Nik, you wrote: N> And on flasque and passively vile responses  - such aggressive attacks? You would offer what responses? What it is possible to do in a current situation?

6

Re: Reliable suppliers

Hello, alsemm, you wrote: GZ>> Effective managers led by itself once again all again  also started to shoot to themselves at a knee. The epoch  proceeds. A> and in what shooting in a knee consists? Imagine that  insults on vendors of compilers you will refuse to deliver software solutions. How many you will hold on in the market?

7

Re: Reliable suppliers

Hello, GlebZ, you wrote: A>> And in what shooting in a knee consists? GZ> imagine that  insults on vendors of compilers you will refuse to deliver software solutions. How many you will hold on in the market? And without stupid analogies? Or to you so it explained?

8

Re: Reliable suppliers

Hello, GlebZ, you wrote: GZ> GZ> Thus, "Gazprom" owes to 2,56 billion Artful Naftagaz already started to consider fines on a debt. Appeals - yes whom they excite.

9

Re: Reliable suppliers

Hello, anonymous, you wrote: A>>> And in what shooting in a knee consists? GZ>> imagine that  insults on vendors of compilers you will refuse to deliver software solutions. How many you will hold on in the market? A> and without stupid analogies? Or to you so it explained? And to read a source code with the selected phrase? Or it is visible nothing, it is understood nothing, Putin our president?

10

Re: Reliable suppliers

You only from torture chambers bloody  let out? Or that, about what did not write in New novayagazeta.ru/news/2018/03/06, does not exist?

11

Re: Reliable suppliers

Hello, GlebZ, you wrote: GZ> Effective managers led by itself once again all again  also started to shoot to themselves at a knee. The epoch  proceeds. Gazprom submitted the claim for a shortage of gas Ukraine, Ukraine submitted the passer for  gas. The Gazpromovsky claim rejected, an Ukrainian confirmed with an explanation of a difficult economic situation in Ukraine. In Gazprom told that 1. Are not going to solve at own expense economic problems of Ukraine, 2. Break off the contract which does not bring profit.

12

Re: Reliable suppliers

Hello, GlebZ, you wrote: GZ>>> Imagine that  insults on vendors of compilers you will refuse to deliver software solutions. How many you will hold on in the market? A>> and without stupid analogies? Or to you so it explained? GZ> and to read a source code with the selected phrase? Or it is visible nothing, it is understood nothing, Putin our president? That is explain you you can not. (And most likely itself you do not understand what yes as.) I and thought.

13

Re: Reliable suppliers

Hello, GlebZ, you wrote: GZ>>> Effective managers led by itself once again all again  also started to shoot to themselves at a knee. The epoch  proceeds. A>> and in what shooting in a knee consists? GZ> imagine that  insults on vendors of compilers you will refuse to deliver software solutions. How many you will hold on in the market? An example not the most correct, but - Apprx. In an example you forgot to mention that one compiler - is collected for a long time and works, and others two - should be  during couple of months. And so - yes, you are right

14

Re: Reliable suppliers

wl.> artful Naftagaz already started to consider fines on a debt. Appeals - yes whom they excite. The fine makes about one million dollars of times in two days.

15

Re: Reliable suppliers

M> Gazprom submitted the claim for a shortage of gas Ukraine, Ukraine submitted the passer for  gas. The Gazpromovsky claim rejected, an Ukrainian confirmed with an explanation of a difficult economic situation in Ukraine. In Gazprom told that 1. Are not going to solve at own expense economic problems of Ukraine, 2. Break off the contract which does not bring profit.  is except Miller's words?

16

Re: Reliable suppliers

Hello, PavelCH, you wrote: PCH> Pruvy is except Miller's words? The Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce does not publish or comment on its rulings, leaving it up to parties involved to go public if they want to. From here So  is not present and cannot be, except announcements of the sides.

17

Re: Reliable suppliers

Hello, Sammo, you wrote: S> I, by the way, am not assured that reviewing about contract cancellation transits faster, than the contract effuses. But in Ukraine there are many patriots. They already blew up support , forbade an aircraft service with Russia, ceased to buy the Russian gas directly and buy it from Slovakia. They blow up a gas conduit,   gas would not swing. On what Gazprom tells: - "force-majeur".

18

Re: Reliable suppliers

Hello, PavelCH, you wrote: PCH> Pruvy is except Miller's words? Absence of refutations from the Ukrainian side can serve as indirect acknowledgement.

19

Re: Reliable suppliers

Hello, GlebZ, you wrote: GZ> Hello, alsemm, you wrote: GZ>>> Effective managers led by itself once again all again  also started to shoot to themselves at a knee. The epoch  proceeds. A>> and in what shooting in a knee consists? GZ> imagine that  insults on vendors of compilers you will refuse to deliver software solutions. How many you will hold on in the market? And present that do not want to pay for your compiler,  that  to pay back moreover and money demand - as far you send clients?

20

Re: Reliable suppliers

PCH> the Fine makes about one million dollars of times in two days. It is necessary to look 1. Whether submission of the appeal stops fine charge. 2. Saw judgement that submission to Stockholm announcements about contract cancellation stops fine charge, including that which already follows the decision under the contract on gas (those 2,5  in December). Here on them the fine precisely is and precisely is already calculated.

21

Re: Reliable suppliers

Hello, Maniacal, you wrote: GZ>> Effective managers led by itself once again all again  also started to shoot to themselves at a knee. The epoch  proceeds. M> Gazprom submitted the claim for a shortage of gas Ukraine, Ukraine submitted the passer for  gas. The Gazpromovsky claim rejected, an Ukrainian confirmed with an explanation of a difficult economic situation in Ukraine. In Gazprom told that 1. Are not going to solve at own expense economic problems of Ukraine, 2. Break off the contract which does not bring profit. ... And what, SO it is possible? At us a difficult economic situation, money a little - we do not want therefore to pay and we will not be? And the court such - well times is not enough money do not pay certainly? And was? Or something can forgot to mention? Whether there is a superior court over Stockholm? What it is accepted to do, when the Stockholm court carries out wrong decisions?

22

Re: Reliable suppliers

Hello, antonio_banderas, you wrote: _> That it is accepted to do, when the Stockholm court carries out wrong decisions? To bomb ?

23

Re: Reliable suppliers

Hello, antonio_banderas, you wrote: whether _> There is a superior court over Stockholm? _> that it is accepted to do, when the Stockholm court carries out wrong decisions? Time can be submitted appeals, means there is a superior court.  Appeal court of Sweden. There put shareholders of YUKOS collapsed in favor of Russia.

24

Re: Reliable suppliers

Hello, Kernan, you wrote: K> Hello, antonio_banderas, you wrote: _>> That it is accepted to do, when the Stockholm court carries out wrong decisions? K> to bomb ? Voronezh does not quit. It is necessary to bomb only in wide trousers.

25

Re: Reliable suppliers

Hello, Maniacal, you wrote: M> Gazprom submitted the claim for a shortage of gas Ukraine, Ukraine submitted the passer for  gas. The Gazpromovsky claim rejected, an Ukrainian confirmed with an explanation of a difficult economic situation in Ukraine. In Gazprom told that 1. Are not going to solve at own expense economic problems of Ukraine, 2. Break off the contract which does not bring profit. At all so. The Gazpromovsky claim did not satisfy with an explanation of a difficult economic situation in Ukraine. (Did not gather additionally, because there is nothing). The Naftogazovsky claim satisfied, though Gazprom resulted similar argument (Europe took less, therefore ). There, of course, the atmosphere, but such game as you described are not present.