Hello, TimurSPB, you wrote: xma>> TimurSPB, to put it briefly you are engaged in substitution of concepts - is asked what for? TSP> Then any more I, and the Chinese government. In Wikipedia is blocked - that you want from them. It to spit, they of a donkey a crocodile name - and all China wikipedia: Wikipedia Blocking in the Peoples Republic of China http://qps.ru/akx5S well and as in China such "socialism" - that such bestial conditions even did not dream leaders of the USSR. At them there only miners on 10 in a year in mines filled up. Pensions at the majority in the country - are not present, well or till 10-15$ in . (Especially "on village") and before passage to market economy (capitalist) in 1979 - there was seams. So, from what side do not look even postsocialist Chinese look rather unattractively in comparison with developed . The countries (at least for the majority of the population living in these countries). . Where that read that Chineses dream to live in the majority as "poor" in . I.e. roughly speaking Americans (if they knew a real state of affairs) cannot - to want to live though in a socialism, though in its post-forms (though there though there that). An output - they want "sociality" - as in western (in particular in Germany). Actually here I agree with Americans - the most accurate form of government, only here it is desirable without refugees.