1

Topic: went?

2

Re: went?

3

Re: went?

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> Or tell lies? What for to use a fighter in a role of a front bomber? Can nevertheless tell lies?

4

Re: went?

Hello,    ija - , you wrote: > Hello, Marty, you wrote: M>> Or tell lies? > what for to use a fighter in a role of a front bomber? Can nevertheless tell lies? -57 works both by air, and by the ground. Consider there are no distinctions. The condition where to him, as a matter of fact, threatens nothing wanted  in fighting.

5

Re: went?

Hello, wraithik, you wrote: W> the condition where to him, as a matter of fact, threatens nothing Wanted  in fighting. As a matter of fact does not threaten? There to Israel and for-efratja one minute of a shot the cruise missile. Whether solved  it can simultaneously on 48 purposes track and fulfill a role and a bomber and a fighter?

6

Re: went?

Hello,    ija - , you wrote: M>> Or tell lies? > what for to use a fighter in a role of a front bomber? Can nevertheless tell lies? Well, I think that "fighter" its journalists name from not very superior intelligence. The project always figured under the cipher of PAK , where  - front aircraft. And it and  aircraft, and assault. Probably, it was possible to combine not bad these functions and while test an assault part.  However, yet did not find this news on more entrusted resources, probably that a duck.

7

Re: went?

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> Well, I think that "fighter" its journalists name from not very superior intelligence. The project always figured under the cipher of PAK , where  - front aircraft. There is still a project of a perspective bomber, but distant, but not an essence important - what to fulfill a role of a front attack plane of Su-25 when the throwing of bombs does not depend on you, and all does  with , it somehow shapko-zakidatelno.

8

Re: went?

Hello,    ija - , you wrote: M>> Well, I think that "fighter" its journalists name from not very superior intelligence. The project always figured under the cipher of PAK , where  - front aircraft. > there is still a project of a perspective bomber, but distant, but not an essence important - what to fulfill a role of a front attack plane of Su-25 when the throwing of bombs does not depend on you, and all does  with , it somehow shapko-zakidatelno. So it  YES This another About  with  is you bent, in my opinion, like all easier, the aim complex for exact bombing works completely locally And why ? The modern technologies in all beauty, not?

9

Re: went?

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> About  with  is you bent, in my opinion, like all easier, it at your sight. And I on it  served M> an aim complex for exact bombing works completely locally aha. . http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/4507779 you know who such cosmonauts? These are past dolls because present dolls are pilots of planes under vigilant control of operator NAKU VKS M> And why ? The modern technologies in all beauty, not? Well if in an end face a tomahawk do not receive from the nearest basis of the USA in a princedom Jordan, yes

10

Re: went?

Similar articles write  hurrah-patriotic sites...

11

Re: went?

12

Re: went?

Hello,    ija - , you wrote: M>> About  with  is you bent, in my opinion, like all easier, > it at your sight. And I on it  served M>> an aim complex for exact bombing works completely locally > aha. . http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/4507779 > you know who such cosmonauts? These are past dolls because present dolls are pilots of planes under vigilant control of operator NAKU VKS Well, about Glonass - it is written, yes. And and here ? M>> And why ? The modern technologies in all beauty, not? > well if in an end face a tomahawk do not receive from the nearest basis of the USA in a princedom Jordan yes For a long time the tomahawk became ?

13

Re: went?

Hello, Bjorn Skalpe, you wrote: BS> Similar articles write  hurrah-patriotic sites... Well, even if also a duck all the same cool to look on explosion

14

Re: went?

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> Well, about Glonass - it is written, yes. And and here ? And to it who does a weather forecast? And adjusts ballistics? All "airborne computer"? Well such small  in  drove. M> for a long time the tomahawk became ? And it not antiaircraft, but on  can.

15

Re: went?

M> Well even if also duck, all the same cool to look on explosion  the Cuckoo praises a cock, it praises for that that a cuckoo... The Self-deception does not lead up to good and all comes to an end badly...

16

Re: went?

> There is no Wagner and never there was Judging by Spiegel investigation, 7 citizens of the Russian Federation perished only... Remaining are Iranian  and soldiers of the governmental forces that tried to wring out oil refining factory at Kurds...

17

Re: went?

Hello,    ija - , you wrote: M>> Well, about Glonass - it is written, yes. And and here ? > and to it who does a weather forecast? And adjusts ballistics? All "airborne computer"? Well such small  in  drove. I think, there is an interaction of systems at various levels. Most likely the most part of the data is flooded before embarkation. The local calculator in a place solves. What for here a supercomputer - it is not clear. And you consider, what it is all - badly? Better as in 41, by eye to bomb? M>> for a long time the tomahawk became ? > and it not antiaircraft, but on  can. And catches up?

18

Re: went?

Hello, , you wrote: M>> Well, generally it is modest enough and on business it is written. You generally above a ceiling jumped up from a pleasure overabundance when  covered. > there is no Wagner and never there was About, here it is turn

19

Re: went?

Hello, Bjorn Skalpe, you wrote: M>> Well even if also duck, all the same cool to look on explosion  BS> the Cuckoo praises a cock, it praises for that that a cuckoo... The Self-deception does not lead up to good and all comes to an end badly... Well, can and badly ends, yes if  into a hysterics run. Perspective idea I think it is possible to consider small house purchase somewhere in the republic of South Africa, Australia or

20

Re: went?

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> Most likely the most part of the data is flooded before embarkation. You mean a landscape with  cards or a weather forecast with 24? M> the Local calculator in a place solves. What for here a supercomputer - it is not clear. M> and you consider, what it is all - badly? Better as in 41, by eye to bomb? I consider that here  a matrix, instead of 41 heard such - "the operator! Deduce me from here!" M>>> For a long time the tomahawk became ? >> and it not antiaircraft, but on  can. M> and catches up? Looking that they in it there put.

21

Re: went?

Hello, , you wrote: M>> Well even if also duck, all the same cool to look on explosion  > at It it is necessary to mold in a granite. > I will add to the arsenal. > an excellent trophy))) Barns, your colleagues added for a long time already it to the arsenal the Author: Head Ache Date: 04.03 17:31. I worry, dismiss after all you for professional-unfitness

22

Re: went?

> so it also was and you Nesmijanu helped to hold a candle

23

Re: went?

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> About, here it is turn certainly turn. "All know" that at this time Wagner helped Valkiriju traces of murder of Bednova before the inspector

24

Re: went?

Hello,    ija - , you wrote: W>> the condition where to him, as a matter of fact, threatens nothing Wanted  in fighting. > as a matter of fact does not threaten? There to Israel and for-efratja one minute of a shot the cruise missile. For a long time cruise missiles of steel ? At all I do not know, whether Pushkin to quote, whether whether at once  to interpose > solved  it can simultaneously on 48 purposes track and fulfill a role and a bomber and a fighter? Can and so. And?

25

Re: went?

, you wrote: >>> so it also was >> and you Nesmijanu helped to hold a candle > Were one of these days on affairs repeatedly I will not tell where, yes we know, in Nekrasovke was - the most terrible ghetto of Russia!! And went just in a zone fenced from zombarej-Russians?