1

Topic: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Here, many countries decided what more favourably to unite in the union, than to hold the army. Reasonably? Quite. What is a position of principle which does not allow to enter the same union Rossie? The communism already is not present... And the second question. Against whom will be at war, who will be the potential enemy if all are in this union?

2

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> And the second question. Against whom will be at war, who will be the potential enemy if all are in this union? Turkey with Greece quite were at war, though also both countries in the NATO. So I pound a zero.

3

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Here, many countries decided what more favourably to unite in the union, than to hold the army. Reasonably? Quite. S> What there is a position of principle which does not allow to enter the same union Rossie? The communism already is not present... S> And the second question. Against whom will be at war, who will be the potential enemy if all are in this union? It is time already at last to all good people to gather and kill all bad people!

4

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Here, many countries decided what more favourably to unite in the union, than to hold the army. Reasonably? Quite. S> What there is a position of principle which does not allow to enter the same union Rossie? The communism already is not present... The NATO It is based on April, 4th, 1949 in the USA, for the purpose of protection of Europe against the Soviet influence If and the USSR already is not present Communism, why the NATO still exists? S> and the second question. Against whom will be at war, who will be the potential enemy if all are in this union? Who potential the enemy of the NATO today?

5

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, , you wrote: > Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S>> What there is a position of principle which does not allow to enter the same union Rossie? The communism already is not present... > Type "do not take" Why "type"? Stalin in 1953 stated such desire in interview to the French journalists. To 1954 USSR directed official request about an entrance to the NATO. In 2000 Putin suggested Clinton to consider the problem on an entrance of Russia to the NATO. But there are ready to invite in the organization of whom-is necessary, except Russia.

6

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Here, many countries decided what more favourably to unite in the union, than to hold the army. Reasonably? Quite. S> What there is a position of principle which does not allow to enter the same union Rossie? The communism already is not present... Because Russia produces the weapon and it sells, entering the NATO to us it is necessary to buy their.  the NATO agrees to buy the Russian weapon I think it is necessary to agree. S> and the second question. Against whom will be at war, who will be the potential enemy if all are in this union? Against enemies of a civilization, ISIS and natsistko-fashistkih modes)

7

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, , you wrote: S>> What there is a position of principle which does not allow to enter the same union Rossie? The communism already is not present... > Type "do not take" And the reason name? There should be a certain basic reason why is not present. Here if the Russian Federation was the Muslim country - it would be possible to name it for the reason... Similar that it is world performance. Russian frighten of the NATO countries, and the NATO countries frighten of Russia. And together each side saws billions   under military needs. Here to you and the decision of notorious dream, the answer on keys a question of Metvogo of Down the Author: Dead Down Date: 02.03 08:22 to live and not to work.

8

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Here, many countries decided what more favourably to unite in the union, than to hold the army. Reasonably? Quite. The NATO countries hold the armies and should spend for them not less than 2 %  a year work to study  before the next post

9

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, Maniacal, you wrote: M> Turkey with Greece quite were at war, though also both countries in the NATO. So I pound a zero. It when? How many perished?

10

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> And the reason name? There should be a certain basic reason why is not present. Here if the Russian Federation was the Muslim country - it would be possible to name it for the reason... S> it is similar that it is world performance. Russian frighten of the NATO countries, and the NATO countries frighten of Russia. And together each side saws billions   under military needs. The NATO countries are entirely under control to the USA, and buttings go because the USA wants overwhelming world domination and full  for now there is Russia - to it it does not shine.

11

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, hlt, you wrote: S>> And the second question. Against whom will be at war, who will be the potential enemy if all are in this union? hlt> who potential the enemy of the NATO today? Similar that aim the NATO now - to embody dream of Metvogo of Down the Author: Dead Down Date: 02.03 08:22 to live and not to work. The enemy it is necessary to invent each time of the new. Now quite  under the enemy mad dictator Putin.

12

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: Putin about integration from the NATO in 2000: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RScYvOm5VXY

13

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, AleksandrN, you wrote: AN> Why "type"? Stalin in 1953 stated such desire in interview to the French journalists. To 1954 USSR directed official request about an entrance to the NATO. In 2000 Putin suggested Clinton to consider the problem on an entrance of Russia to the NATO. But there are ready to invite in the organization of whom-is necessary, except Russia. So then there was a communism, and now it is not present.

14

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, AleksandrN, you wrote: AN> Why "type"? Stalin in 1953 stated such desire in interview to the French journalists. Type Stalin Putin did not understand that this step not only allocates our country with the rights and gives it advantages, but also demands execution of certain duties. Which neither that nor another to lay to itself actually did not want. Therefore all quickly came to an end  and . And not only in relations from the NATO.

15

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, galileo, you wrote: G> because Russia produces the weapon and it sells, entering the NATO to us it is necessary to buy their.  the NATO agrees to buy the Russian weapon I think it is necessary to agree. And what the Russian weapon than that is worse? Why do not want to buy? S>> and the second question. Against whom will be at war, who will be the potential enemy if all are in this union? G> against enemies of a civilization, ISIS and natsistko-fashistkih modes) And there are such? What possibilities at them? Where their military bases?

16

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Hello, AleksandrN, you wrote: AN>> Why "type"? Stalin in 1953 stated such desire in interview to the French journalists. To 1954 USSR directed official request about an entrance to the NATO. In 2000 Putin suggested Clinton to consider the problem on an entrance of Russia to the NATO. But there are ready to invite in the organization of whom-is necessary, except Russia. S> so then there was a communism, and now it is not present. There was a socialism. Communism was not. It long built, but did not construct. And in 2000 - communism building has been contracted for a long time.

17

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, AleksandrN, you wrote: G>> because Russia produces the weapon and it sells, entering the NATO to us it is necessary to buy their.  the NATO agrees to buy the Russian weapon I think it is necessary to agree. AN> obligations to buy are not present. There is an obligation to lead to uniform standards. Interesting! Certainly with stores it is necessary , but probably it would be compensated by new commodity markets if to translate our factories to the new standard. It seems to me it is necessary to enter.

18

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, AleksandrN, you wrote: AN>>> Why "type"? Stalin in 1953 stated such desire in interview to the French journalists. To 1954 USSR directed official request about an entrance to the NATO. In 2000 Putin suggested Clinton to consider the problem on an entrance of Russia to the NATO. But there are ready to invite in the organization of whom-is necessary, except Russia. S>> so then there was a communism, and now it is not present. AN> There was a socialism. Communism was not. It long built, but did not construct. And in 2000 - communism building has been contracted for a long time. I think here not so the term, how many the fact of that is important that in Russia there was an ideology hostile to the capitalist countries. Which already is not present

19

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> And what the Russian weapon than that is worse? Why do not want to buy? The standard another? Did not know? G>> against enemies of a civilization, ISIS and natsistko-fashistkih modes) S> And there are such? What possibilities at them? Where their military bases? Is, but I to you cannot tell, it is the classified information!

20

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Hello, Maniacal, you wrote: M>> Turkey with Greece quite were at war, though also both countries in the NATO. So I pound a zero. S> it when? How many perished? For example, on July, 20th - on August, 17th 1974 Turks: Only 3500 victims among military men and civilians, including 568 soldiers are killed (498 - VS , 70 - Open Company), apprx. 2000 - are wounded Greeks: Only 4500-6000 killed and wounded men among military men and civilians of Republic Cyprus and Greece, 2000-3000 persons Greeks-Cypriotes were missing: 309 perished, 909 was missing, 1141 it is wounded. 12 tanks, 7 armored troop-carrier, 47 tools (in the core it is thrown). Greece: 88 perished, 83 was missing, 148 it is wounded. Turks-Cypriotes: 70 perished? Was missing? Wounded. Turkey: 498 perished, 1200 it is wounded. 26 tanks, 4 armored troop-carrier, 24 tools, 1 destroyer.

21

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Here, many countries decided what more favourably to unite in the union, than to hold the army. Reasonably? Quite. S> What there is a position of principle which does not allow to enter the same union Rossie? The communism already is not present... S> And the second question. Against whom will be at war, who will be the potential enemy if all are in this union? The second question comprises the answer to the first...

22

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, galileo, you wrote: G> it seems To me it is necessary to enter. And what, someone offers?

23

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, galileo, you wrote: G> it is interesting! Certainly with stores it is necessary , but probably it would be compensated by new commodity markets if to translate our factories to the new standard. Counting on commodity markets in the countries using the NATO standard on ammunition to small arms, made -101 under the NATO cartridge 5,56x45. Probably, there are export modifications of other our weapon under NATO standards. G> it seems to me it is necessary to enter. Persuade the NATO

24

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, , you wrote: > Hello, AleksandrN, you wrote: AN>> And how to be with official request in 1954? > On the little fool, perhaps  Negotiations about an entrance to the similar organization can go for years. And if there is no the basic disagreement all questions it is possible to consider and agree. After a failure on request of the USSR about an entrance to the NATO, the Warsaw Treaty Organization has been created.

25

Re: What position of principle does not allow to enter the Russian Federation the NATO?

Hello, L.Long, you wrote: G>> it seems To me it is necessary to enter. LL> and what, someone offers? Once the old maid asked, and that you in marriage do not quit... Though of what it I I think if it is necessary to us, can simply move in this direction, and is more distinct show our desire. It is necessary to inform simply thought that people started to think and consider, with  it becomes possible.