1

Topic: High percent of verdicts of "not guilty"

The high percent of verdicts of "not guilty" in some countries using a so-called case law, is a sign or a confused consequence, or - bribability of judicial system (not specific judges, namely the system allowing for money to leave from punishment). How think, what factor prevails?

2

Re: High percent of verdicts of "not guilty"

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: M> As think, what factor prevails? Simply other allocation of duties - other approach. The part of duties of a consequence is laid to court. Well and stupidity with bribability gets out in other places and in some other way because of it.

3

Re: High percent of verdicts of "not guilty"

M> As think, what factor prevails? There in essence other approach. At them the consequence is actually led in court. That at them is the verdict of "not guilty", at us does not reach court at all.

4

Re: High percent of verdicts of "not guilty"

Hello, Dym On, you wrote: DO> There in essence other approach. At them the consequence is actually led in court. That at them is the verdict of "not guilty", at us does not reach court at all. And there is statistics, what percent put with the installed suspects at us to court does not reach?

5

Re: High percent of verdicts of "not guilty"

It  you hope smoothly to bring the reader to what low interest of verdicts of "not guilty" in Russia speaks professionalism of inspectors and incorruptible judicial system? But some slander that at Stalin of verdicts of "not guilty" too was much.

6

Re: High percent of verdicts of "not guilty"

Z> And there is statistics, what percent put with the installed suspects at us to court does not reach? Is, the Office of Public Prosecutor conducts. And whether here it is published - I do not know. Any aggregated digits can be sounded, but is detailed, the primary data most likely is not published.

7

Re: High percent of verdicts of "not guilty"

Q> It  you hope smoothly to bring the reader to that... He hopes to bring to thought that it is impossible to measure by one ruler temperature and pressure. The indexes approaching for measurement of efficiency of one system do not approach for another.

8

Re: High percent of verdicts of "not guilty"

Hello, qwertyuiop, you wrote: Q> It  you hope smoothly to bring the reader to that Not, it you hope. Invented for it theses, and allow to unmask.

9

Re: High percent of verdicts of "not guilty"

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: M> High percent of verdicts of "not guilty" in some countries using a so-called case law, Realy? I want . M> As think, what factor prevails? Stupidity .

10

Re: High percent of verdicts of "not guilty"

Hello, biochemist, you wrote: M>> High percent of verdicts of "not guilty" in some countries using a so-called case law, B> Realy? I want . It to Abalaku and to. Today from it arrived. M>> as think, what factor prevails? B> stupidity . On  time is necessary.

11

Re: High percent of verdicts of "not guilty"

Hello, Ziaw, you wrote: DO>> There in essence other approach. At them the consequence is actually led in court. That at them is the verdict of "not guilty", at us does not reach court at all. Z> and there is statistics, what percent put with the installed suspects at us to court does not reach? Here, for example: the Investigatory committee from the moment of the formation as independent department in 2011 had time to excite almost 57 thousand criminal cases about corruption, however "to court has been directed 22 thousand from them", Bastrykin informed. Thus, it is possible to finish to court only one of 2,5 criminal cases about corruption. RIA Novosti news agency https://ria.ru/incidents/20131204/981941499.html

12

Re: High percent of verdicts of "not guilty"

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: M> the High percent of verdicts of "not guilty" in some countries using a so-called case law, M> is a sign or a confused consequence, or - bribability of judicial system (not specific judges, namely the system allowing for money to leave from punishment). M> As think, what factor prevails? The countries with a case law is, as a rule, the Anglo-Saxon countries. In the remaining countries of the world the right, as a rule, not case. It would be desirable to learn about percent of verdicts of "not guilty" in the countries with not case the right. P.S. It would be desirable, that at us in Russia the percent of verdicts of "not guilty" raised. Would cease to put for "excess of necessary self-defense" and other similar nonsense.

13

Re: High percent of verdicts of "not guilty"

Hello, sambl74, you wrote: S> S> the Investigatory committee from the moment of the formation as independent department in 2011 had time to excite almost 57 thousand criminal cases about corruption, however "to court has been directed 22 thousand from them", Bastrykin informed. S> Thus, it is possible to finish to court only one of 2,5 criminal cases about corruption. S> RIA Novosti news agency https://ria.ru/incidents/20131204/981941499.html as that digits 2.5 of %, 57  22 thousand do not fight

14

Re: High percent of verdicts of "not guilty"

Hello, Ziaw, you wrote: S>> S>> the Investigatory committee from the moment of the formation as independent department in 2011 had time to excite almost 57 thousand criminal cases about corruption, however "to court has been directed 22 thousand from them", Bastrykin informed. S>> Thus, it is possible to finish to court only one of 2,5 criminal cases about corruption. S>> RIA Novosti news agency https://ria.ru/incidents/20131204/981941499.html Z> as that digits 2.5 of % do not fight, 57  22 thousand "one of 2,5" is 1/2.5 = 40 %, i.e. 60 % do not reach court. In the given example.

15

Re: High percent of verdicts of "not guilty"

Hello, Ziaw, you wrote: Z> as that digits 2.5 of % do not fight, 57  22 thousand Approximately 57  on approximately 22  if to divide - 2.5 approximately and turns out. And it already you invented percent

16

Re: High percent of verdicts of "not guilty"

Hello, fmiracle, you wrote: F> "one of 2,5" is 1/2.5 = 40 %, i.e. 60 % do not reach court. In the given example. It I was mistaken.

17

Re: High percent of verdicts of "not guilty"

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: M> As think, what factor prevails? Here that  across Canada. The general statistics - 63 % of affairs came to an end with verdicts of guilty. The most popular punishment (43 %) - the conditional period (probation),  period - 1 year. That is interesting - more half (55.6 %) real periods were 1 month and less. Study - there many curious digits more shortly.

18

Re: High percent of verdicts of "not guilty"

Hello, RussianFellow, you wrote: RF> would Cease to put for "excess of necessary self-defense" and other similar nonsense. What should it mean in practice? It would begin possible to kill with impunity any in whom you  bad intentions in relation to itself?... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

19

Re: High percent of verdicts of "not guilty"

Hello, pagid, you wrote: RF>> would Cease to put for "excess of necessary self-defense" and other similar nonsense. P> that it should mean in practice? It would begin possible to kill with impunity any in whom you  bad intentions in relation to itself? Well also there is a set of normal justifications at self-defense. Whether all so is smooth with cases of its excess?

20

Re: High percent of verdicts of "not guilty"

Hello, pagid, you wrote: P> That it should mean in practice? It would begin possible to kill with impunity any in whom you  bad intentions in relation to itself? So, naturally, strictly certain cases, instead of the first comer in the street.