1

Topic: About the probability fighting scenario

Here it became interesting as events will develop is admissible at  there are no super rockets to answer, and  decided to attack where ? On ? And further? Land a landing in the east and go to Moscow? Or through Poland? We admit occupied Moscow and what will do further? What further program? Like Germans threatened to select with all allotments, and even in the book about it wrote

2

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: > here it became interesting as events > will develop is admissible at  there are no super rockets to answer, and  Dopustmi decided to attack that at the USA all planes and rockets collapsed. > where ? On ? Yes where they  without planes?

3

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: > it is admissible at  there are no super rockets to answer, and  decided to attack What for the super? Normal rockets do not suit? Instead of there would be their world a little other and very much can be and the question of it would not arise.

4

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Hello, pagid, you wrote: P> Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: >> it is admissible at  there are no super rockets to answer, and  decided to attack P> What for the super? Normal rockets do not suit? Instead of there would be their world a little other and very much can be and the question of it would not arise. What for then to create super rockets if there are normal?

5

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: > here it became interesting as events > will develop is admissible at  there are no super rockets to answer, and  decided to attack > where ? On ? The USA still in 1919 could attack. And what for it to attack the Russian Federation if from that there is no threat?

6

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Hello, siberia2, you wrote: S> the USA still in 1919 could attack. And what for it to attack the Russian Federation if from that there is no threat? And you do not check They it

7

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Hello, siberia2, you wrote: S> the USA still in 1919 could attack. So like also attacked S> And what for it to attack the Russian Federation if from that there is no threat? The opponent is always necessary, new "axis" is necessary to them. But China already is too strong economically, Russia is too strong in the military plan. Remaining opponents too small to collect "alliance".

8

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Hello, siberia2, you wrote: S> Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: >> here it became interesting as events >> will develop is admissible at  there are no super rockets to answer, and  decided to attack >> where ? On ? S> the USA still in 1919 could attack. And what for it to attack the Russian Federation if from that there is no threat? All these countries threatened the USA! The link

9

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: > what for then to create super rockets if there are normal? At first, to replace all early it is necessary, service life not borderless Secondly, for possibility of bypass of the ABM

10

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

> All these countries threatened the USA! The link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBhRdQUw-XY

11

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

> here it became interesting as events > will develop is admissible at  there are no super rockets to answer, and  decided to attack > where ? On ? On rocket mines. And then anything, because what for?

12

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Hello, koenig, you wrote: K> on rocket mines. And then anything, because what for? That is you suppose that from the USA it is possible to expect the first, unexpected, sudden, causeless shock and a crippling stroke. Cheerful perspective.

13

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

K>> on rocket mines. And then anything, because what for? P> That is you suppose that from the USA it is possible to expect the first, unexpected, sudden, causeless shock and a crippling stroke. P> cheerful perspective. Causeless hardly - at them on the panel it is not accepted to drop valenoks, the reason find. In remaining - certainly it is possible, for this purpose at them it is a lot of means.

14

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Hello, koenig, you wrote: K> in remaining - certainly it is possible, for this purpose at them it is a lot of means. What

15

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Hello, koenig, you wrote: >> here it became interesting as events >> will develop is admissible at  there are no super rockets to answer, and  decided to attack >> where ? On ? K> on rocket mines. And then anything, because what for? What for then to bomb rocket mines?

16

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Yes as usual. To kill the head of the state. To arrange civil war, to support terrorists, to show plots about sufferings of the people and struggle for democracy.

17

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Hello, koenig, you wrote: K> on rocket mines. And then anything, because what for? Except mines, there are still trucks with rockets which on one place do not stand, and go for a drive it is not known where, submarines with rockets which too on one place do not stand, and planes with rockets which, probably, to trace easier. Therefore this risky enough occupation,  on rocket mines.

18

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: > it is admissible at  there are no super rockets to answer, and  decided to attack > where ? On ? > and further? Land a landing in the east and go to Moscow? Or through Poland? You think categories of second half of 20 centuries. Not you read those books. "Bozhenka puts cheese all time in different places..." Forget everything to that you learned. Now the most probable scenario such: 1. The USA are given to Ukraine by the weapon to suppress LNR/DNR. 2. Further the USA hands of Ukraine starts war in Crimea. 3. Simultaneously the destroyer of the USA from Black sea destroys fleet of the Russian Federation in Crimea. 4. The United Nations did not recognize a referendum in Crimea, on it actually Crimea is Ukraine, on the basis of the old conventional documents. On the basis of it the USA enters peacemakers who will "help" the Ukrainian army with struggle against the invader. Here so approximately.

19

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: Pzz> Except mines, there are still trucks with rockets which on one place do not stand, and go for a drive it is not known where, submarines with rockets which too on one place do not stand, and planes with rockets which, probably, to trace easier. Still rockets from mines can take off earlier, than on them arrives. Pzz> therefore this risky enough occupation,  on rocket mines. It is fantastic nonsense.

20

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Now the most probable scenario such: S> 1. The USA are given to Ukraine by the weapon to suppress LNR/DNR. S> 2. Further the USA hands of Ukraine starts war in Crimea. The story consisting of  also begins. S> 3. Simultaneously the destroyer of the USA from Black sea destroys fleet of the Russian Federation in Crimea. Them also proceeds. S> 4. The United Nations did not recognize a referendum in Crimea, on it actually Crimea is Ukraine, on the basis of the old conventional documents. On the basis of it the USA enters peacemakers who will "help" the Ukrainian army with struggle against the invader. Also comes to an end without waking up.

21

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Forget everything to that you learned. S> 1. The USA are given to Ukraine by the weapon to suppress LNR/DNR. You too good the judgement on the USA, sells, moreover and  and on 200 % annual S> 2. Further the USA hands of Ukraine starts war in Crimea. You of too good judgement on the Ukrainian army.  do not help S> 3. Simultaneously the destroyer of the USA from Black sea destroys fleet of the Russian Federation in Crimea. You of too good judgement on the American destroyer. S> 4. The United Nations did not recognize a referendum in Crimea, on it actually Crimea is Ukraine, on the basis of the old conventional documents. On the basis of it the USA enters peacemakers who will "help" the Ukrainian army with struggle against the invader. You of too good judgement on army of the USA, operation in banana republics and in the short-range east it certainly is good,    ... S> Here so approximately.

22

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Hello, vitz, you wrote: S>> the USA still in 1919 could attack. And what for it to attack the Russian Federation if from that there is no threat? V> and you do not check They it  And whom Yankees attacked? Tell about battles! Disembarkation in Vladivostok was at the desire of the Moscow Bolsheviks and under the personal request Kerensky. For the sake of this disembarkation Moscow even recognized independence  (Yankees did not want to swear at Japanese from communism building). Meanness  is shown in all beauty - disembarkation under the request against Japan named intervention later. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/____#______ the USA counteracted attempts of Japan to annex the Russian Far East https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94%D0 … 0%BA%D0%B0 Japan under the pressure of the USA, in the conditions of diplomatic insulation at the Washington conference of 1921-1922 and internal political complications evacuated the armies from Primorski Krai read the sources More attentively! And here armies , it turns out, really illegally intruded on territory independent .

23

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: > it is admissible occupied Moscow and what will do further? What further program? > like Germans threatened to select with all allotments, and even in the book about it wrote At first to them it is necessary to disorganize the country, that  it on slices.

24

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Hello, Skorodum, you wrote: S>> the USA still in 1919 could attack. S> so like also attacked Tell more in detail about battles! S>> and what for it to attack the Russian Federation if from that there is no threat? S> the opponent is always necessary, you confuse the Yankee to the red

25

Re: About the probability fighting scenario

Hello, pagid, you wrote: S>> 1. The USA are given to Ukraine by the weapon to suppress LNR/DNR. S>> 2. Further the USA hands of Ukraine starts war in Crimea. P> the story consisting of  also begins. And in what ? To be a condom? The USA simply uses a situation for easing or defeat of Russia. Thus that that from Ukraine remains nothing - them does not disturb.