1

Topic: Putin destroyed by bombing Florida

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ms3D6h8fc-4

2

Re: Putin destroyed by bombing Florida

Hello, , you wrote: > Hello, Bjorn Skalpe, you wrote: > And then the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is surprised - " all of them such "? Brothers our not brotherly say that it is frames from a Turkish cartoon film of 2012.

3

Re: Putin destroyed by bombing Florida

Hello, , you wrote: > And  it to twist on the message of the president? For it it has more in the Panamanian stuff Boringly and so though animated cartoons looked. And in the Panamanian it does not have offshore, it does not turn out to stuff.

4

Re: Putin destroyed by bombing Florida

Hello, , you wrote: > And then the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is surprised - " all of them such "? Generally more few. It is necessary as "dear partners" directly in program documents to name the USA a threat to peace.

5

Re: Putin destroyed by bombing Florida

Hello, , you wrote: > And then the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is surprised - " all of them such "? Really, strange. Here what for Napoleon  to Moscow? Probably was the Russophile. And how many such was both to it, and after it.

6

Re: Putin destroyed by bombing Florida

Hello, , you wrote: > And then the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is surprised - " all of them such "? You as always confused the reason with a consequence

7

Re: Putin destroyed by bombing Florida

BS> Image: DXM74QmWkAAzWp9.jpg the most ridiculous the budget did not suffice even completely a new roller to stir up. On the last frames (where warheads scatter) a roller about . The horse-radish knows how old is he. Saw it  for a long time. It is quite searched on .

8

Re: Putin destroyed by bombing Florida

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: K> the most ridiculous the budget did not suffice even completely a new roller to stir up. On the last frames (where warheads scatter) a roller about . The horse-radish knows how old is he. Saw it  for a long time. It is quite searched on . A warhead, I think, did not change. Replaced only  on . By the way,  the Sarmatian, like as, still were going to use for creation of modular heavy missiles for delivery of the big loads to an orbit/moon/mars. Or I confuse to another perspective ?

9

Re: Putin destroyed by bombing Florida

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: M> Here what for Napoleon  to Moscow? Under impression of passage of Suvorov through the Alpes

10

Re: Putin destroyed by bombing Florida

Hello, Bjorn Skalpe, you wrote: BS> Image: DXM74QmWkAAzWp9.jpg But here business such... After all for what that this weapon becomes? On whom to show as it works? Who the potential enemy? Actually not the weapon forms for the enemy, and the ENEMY is sought UNDER the WEAPON.  a cool piece which costs billions, and now it would be necessary to find on whom it to test... Certainly, really anybody will not test, but to justify the spent billions - it is necessary. Here so "virtually" displayed the potential opponent On Africa you will not show...

11

Re: Putin destroyed by bombing Florida

Hello, Maniacal, you wrote: M> By the way,  the Sarmatian, like as, still were going to use for creation of modular heavy missiles for delivery of the big loads to an orbit/moon/mars. Is not present M> Or I confuse to another perspective ? You confuse. The Sarmatian not  and at all the carrier rocket.

12

Re: Putin destroyed by bombing Florida

Hello, pagid, you wrote: P> Hello, Maniacal, you wrote: P> you Confuse. The Sarmatian not  and at all the carrier rocket. Precisely. That rocket carrier "Angara" is called.

13

Re: Putin destroyed by bombing Florida

Hello, , you wrote: > At first the NATO figures in our military doctrine as threat since 2010, wake up. And it is necessary was specific the USA because someone else believes that the NATO without states from itself represents something.

14

Re: Putin destroyed by bombing Florida

Hello, Bjorn Skalpe, you wrote: Well  what present made for  propagation. A picture of rockets flying on  and an applause. ... And the main thing what for it was necessary in the message? For Americans? So they and so for certain knew all already. For electorate? So is better in news on the first a subject would hold apart. Those at least would make rollers more qualitatively. In general, in my opinion, somehow the Message inconveniently turned out did not look, Putin can there and smoothed things over somehow, type we for world peace, but to spread that now will be here it "include video please"