1

Topic: and IT

What is "a command of professionals" Navalnogo or as Wolves and to * all polymers... And on another spoiled still. Short: 1) a site of Navalnogo blocked 2) the author of the decision for bypass of locks decided Navalnomu to help 3) stated the accurate plan to which should be followed 4) &, including their command  with the plan agreed 5) but instead of its accurate execution  as rams through prickles what for? Why? The citation of Lavrova arises... 7) both the purposes did not reach, and the decision burned, and on-result the idiotic act now delivered a problem to absolutely other people.

2

Re: and IT

Hello, , you wrote:>> some providers started to lock all packets on the port 443, not similar on HTTPS. As a matter of fact, providers broke to clients the Internet. "> but it is guilty in all not , and Navalnyj  made their idiots? About, my God!

3

Re: and IT

Hello, , you wrote: > It is any  , it all in a top in   Is known enough in narrow circles of the people > but is guilty in all not , and of Navalnyj do not try to change the subject. Speech about approaches and observance of obligations.

4

Re: and IT

Hello, IID, you wrote: IID> That such "a command of professionals" Navalnogo or as Wolves and to * all polymers IID>... And on another spoiled still. IID> it is short: IID> 1) a site of Navalnogo blocked IID> 2) the author of the decision for bypass of locks decided Navalnomu to help IID> 3) stated the accurate plan to which should be followed IID> 4) &, including their command  with the plan agreed IID> 5) but instead of its accurate execution  as rams through prickles IID> what for? Why? The citation of Lavrova arises... IID> 7) both the purposes did not reach, and the decision burned, and on-result the idiotic act now delivered a problem to absolutely other people. The author writes an IT command underestimates Roskomnadzor, considers the people working there, stupid. And thus itself considers their stupid. As though nobody guesses that happens, if it not to tell.

5

Re: and IT

Hello, nme, you wrote: nme> the Author writes nme> an IT command underestimates Roskomnadzor, considers the people working there, stupid. nme> and thus itself considers their stupid. As though nobody guesses that happens, if it not to tell. Any  the justification of meanness Navalnistov lock Bypass at the very least, but worked. Any essential time (weeks, months). But speech at all about lock. And about actions &. Time incurred obligations - means them it is necessary to observe. Superfluous acknowledgement of that stand "" Mr. Navalnogo.

6

Re: and IT

Hello, IID, you wrote: IID> But speech at all about lock. And about actions &. IID> Time was incurred by obligations - means them it is necessary to observe. Superfluous acknowledgement of that stand "" Mr. Navalnogo. About "obligations" somehow the subject is not uncovered. What it "obligations" took?

7

Re: and IT

IID>> But speech at all about lock. And about actions &. IID>> Time was incurred by obligations - means them it is necessary to observe. Superfluous acknowledgement of that stand "" Mr. Navalnogo. D> about "obligations" somehow the subject is not uncovered. What it "obligations" took? Was obliged to fulfill in a silent way the plan of measures on bypass of lock which it invented. And on-fact cut at once and there and then all about it told.

8

Re: and IT

Hello, peiv, you wrote: IID>>> But speech at all about lock. And about actions &. IID>>> Time was incurred by obligations - means them it is necessary to observe. Superfluous acknowledgement of that stand "" Mr. Navalnogo. D>> about "obligations" somehow the subject is not uncovered. What it "obligations" took? P> Was obliged to fulfill in a silent way the plan of measures on bypass of lock which it invented. And on-fact cut at once and there and then all about it told. What means "in a silent way" with its audience? Most likely the one who invented "plan" probably invented also "obligations". I here do not represent as "in a silent way" to inform tens, and even hundreds thousand visitors. Well and what closed bypass of locks are in general plus for the country, unless not so? They there like as addicts, yes a children's porno wanted to struggle.

9

Re: and IT

Hello, peiv, you wrote: P> Was obliged to fulfill in a silent way the plan of measures on bypass of lock which it invented. And on-fact cut at once and there and then all about it told. It, in general, is indicative - to a command of Navalnogo is important political momentary  on power opposition, instead of systematic development as political force. All their essence in one act. Actually, to it and lock was more necessary, than its absence.

10

Re: and IT

Hello, Dimonka, you wrote: D> That means "in a silent way" with its audience? Most likely the one who invented "plan" probably invented also "obligations". I here do not represent as "in a silent way" to inform tens, and even hundreds thousand visitors. Work to read that you try to consider. Not to talk nonsense.

11

Re: and IT

Hello, IID, you wrote: >> It is any  , it all in a top in   IID> Is known enough in narrow circles of the people Yes, still since , but I am not assured that one strongly hinders another.

12

Re: and IT

Hello, Sharowarsheg, you wrote: IID>> It is known enough in narrow circles of people S> Yes, still since , but I am not assured that one strongly hinders another. To Oboralsja Navalnyj - give now all who about it speaks we christen " ". So-so a position. Weak.

13

Re: and IT

Hello, , you wrote: > but it is guilty in all not , and Navalnyj There on a reference is specially for you dialogue: -like-: i.e. your way hostages are guilty in x invaders? And further downwards esteem.

14

Re: and IT

Hello, , you wrote: > Yes not, it is exact . > Fulfils Barnc, to you again  in trousers Here that the Nouse carried a bit later: the History of the big lie of the Nouse That sporaw is the owner  which number is sewn up in , I heard in July from Hipponena. I looked at it , and understood that it is a question of any Petersburg cyber-criminal what in Northern Capital an ass chew, it is a nursery. I had fun,  sporaw, and forgot about it. Generally it is cheerful from an explanation quits: a post did not read ("did not walk to read a post"), anything about the person does not know (" and forgot"), but... Produced failure of covers! With "the most detailed information" on request from , polices, whether and even hardly exact number of "access codes" () specified. Allow to take an interest, this knowledge whence condescended? Whence these "facts" (anybody does not doubt, what it not the facts?

15

Re: and IT

Hello, , you wrote: > Hello, IID, you wrote: IID>> Generally it is cheerful from an explanation quits: a post did not read ("did not walk to read a post"), anything about the person does not know (" and forgot"), but... Produced failure of covers! With "the most detailed information" on request from , polices, whether and even hardly exact number of "access codes" () specified. Allow to take an interest, this knowledge whence condescended? Whence these "facts" (anybody does not doubt, what it not the facts? > to whom are interesting  any marsh  which took for ? And that the post from 2012, turns out, did not take?

16

Re: and IT

Hello, , you wrote: > Yes what difference. Really. > all it  a type shit  Hella You do not confuse "" with "protivo-navalnym". > it appearing on a dock looks it is a pity enough. Interesting as though you there looked

17

Re: and IT

Hello, IID, you wrote: D>> That means "in a silent way" with its audience? Most likely the one who invented "plan" probably invented also "obligations". I here do not represent as "in a silent way" to inform tens, and even hundreds thousand visitors. IID> Work to read that you try to consider. Not to talk nonsense. Explain then on fingers that there it is written about a method. I understood nothing. But I so understood that the most important thing you excites that now other people cannot bypass lock by this method. You consider it as terrible treachery. I correctly understood it?

18

Re: and IT

Hello, Dimonka, you wrote: D> Explain then on fingers that there it is written about a method. I understood nothing. On the server some is installed a software + the configuration that helps to bypass lock changes. At least one of methods is described directly there: the server answer at setting HTTPS of session is cut on a packet in the size of 2 bytes + all remaining. It helped against systems of the analysis of the traffic: they ceased to perceive such traffic as HTTPS and did not include . Rules. It is assured, the full list of methods and techniques much more and more difficult, but and it it is enough for the general understanding. D> But I so understood that the most important thing you excites that now other people cannot bypass lock by this method. You consider it as terrible treachery. I correctly understood it? No, not correctly. To me to spit on lock. Me amuses as easily and easy  concern the promises and arrangements. And it is even more - their defenders, in attempts to justify.

19

Re: and IT

Hello, IID, you wrote: IID>>> It is known enough in narrow circles of people S>> Yes, still since , but I am not assured that one strongly hinders another. IID> to Oboralsja Navalnyj - give now all who about it speaks we christen " ". So-so a position. Weak. This position can also weak, but ancient. At me, at least, considerably ancient Navalnogo.

20

Re: and IT

Hello, peiv, you wrote: p> Was obliged to fulfill in a silent way the plan of measures on bypass of lock which it invented. And on-fact cut at once and there and then all about it told. In article is not present words that Navalnyj or Wolves were incurred by any obligations.

21

Re: and IT

Hello, IID, you wrote: D>> But I so understood that the most important thing you excites that now other people cannot bypass lock by this method. You consider it as terrible treachery. I correctly understood it? IID> is not present, not correctly. To me to spit on lock. Me amuses as easily and easy  concern the promises and arrangements. And it is even more - their defenders, in attempts to justify. Well so with whom who agreed there not obviously. And who to whom promised too not obviously. Ajtishniki Navalnogo promised something to make in a silent way, Navalnyj disagreed with it.

22

Re: and IT

Hello, Dimonka, you wrote: D> That means "in a silent way" with its audience? Most likely the one who invented "plan" probably invented also "obligations". I here do not represent as "in a silent way" to inform tens, and even hundreds thousand visitors. Idea of the HARDWARE how much I understood, that if suddenly someone else from IT', or 'IT', wants to help Navalnomu it is necessary to be convinced that he did not invent the obligation and that they will be observed. Well, for example, if who like to vote for it, or there  it is necessary to be convinced that those "obligations" of Navalnogo for which you support it, really exist and will be observed.

23

Re: and IT

Hello, Erop, you wrote: D>> That means "in a silent way" with its audience? Most likely the one who invented "plan" probably invented also "obligations". I here do not represent as "in a silent way" to inform tens, and even hundreds thousand visitors. E> idea of the HARDWARE how much I understood, that if suddenly someone else from IT', or 'IT', wants to help Navalnomu it is necessary to be convinced that he did not invent the obligation and that they will be observed. How much I remember, it  already threw one. E> well, for example, if who would like to vote for it, or there  it is necessary to be convinced that those "obligations" of Navalnogo for which you support it, really exist and will be observed. And already nothing helps these.

24

Re: and IT

Hello, Erop, you wrote: D>> That means "in a silent way" with its audience? Most likely the one who invented "plan" probably invented also "obligations". I here do not represent as "in a silent way" to inform tens, and even hundreds thousand visitors. E> idea of the HARDWARE how much I understood, that if suddenly someone else from IT', or 'IT', wants to help Navalnomu it is necessary to be convinced that he did not invent the obligation and that they will be observed. Here the logic at assistants could be absolutely another - for example they suggest to help Navalnomu to bypass lock by an illegal method.  use a "silent" method and there is one of those who writes about drugs, a suicide and spreads a children's porno.  tells about a bypass method - too bad, broke "obligations" to those who in "silent" bypasses locks. Though on idea ajtishnikam-tihushnikam it is necessary to cover a bench, that Chinese  normally worked, not? Here like as all for lock were, Vlad the first shouted that  a children's porno absolutely ungirdled.

25

Re: and IT

Hello, Dimonka, you wrote: D> Here the logic at assistants could be absolutely another - for example they suggest to help Navalnomu to bypass lock by an illegal method. Why the illegal?