1

Topic: [] Javlinsky - the best candidate

2

Re: [] Javlinsky - the best candidate

Hello, jhfrek, you wrote: J> Image: DWeckqeW0AAzPU3.jpg It unsharp.

3

Re: [] Javlinsky - the best candidate

Ops> It unsharp. But the program accurate

4

Re: [] Javlinsky - the best candidate

Hello, jhfrek, you wrote: J> but the program accurate the Program we and so, without it we implement.

5

Re: [] Javlinsky - the best candidate

J>> but the program accurate Ops> the Program we and so, without it we implement. So does not happen, if to you who allows to implement that, candidates would be not necessary

6

Re: [] Javlinsky - the best candidate

Hello, jhfrek, you wrote: J> so does not happen, if to you who allows to implement that, candidates would be not necessary And such and are not necessary. The program, of course, fresh and original, but it all the same the unsharp.

7

Re: [] Javlinsky - the best candidate

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> And such also are not necessary. The program, of course, fresh and original, but it all the same the unsharp. And it that, not a photoshop? To me it is necessary  with double

8

Re: [] Javlinsky - the best candidate

Abruptly... Javlinsky does not forbid... I will follow it...

9

Re: [] Javlinsky - the best candidate

Hello, jhfrek, you wrote: J> but the program accurate Than?

10

Re: [] Javlinsky - the best candidate

Hello, Patsak, you wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPehx1i-df8 In 96 year Javlinsky would be the best variant, it is a pity that it then did not select. Perhaps, already now Russia would be the European State. Already it is finite late.

11

Re: [] Javlinsky - the best candidate

J>> but the program accurate VD> Than? Focus

12

Re: [] Javlinsky - the best candidate

A> In 96 year Javlinsky would be the best variant, it is a pity that it then did not select.  it is necessary  a smilie

13

Re: [] Javlinsky - the best candidate

Hello, jhfrek, you wrote: A>> In 96 year Javlinsky would be the best variant, it is a pity that it then did not select. J>  Yeltsin you is necessary  a smilie then arranged more? Here it is exact  a smilie it is necessary.

14

Re: [] Javlinsky - the best candidate

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> In 96 year Javlinsky would be the best variant, it is a pity that it then did not select. If backdating then Zhirinovsky, was precisely not worse , possibly it is better. And it was not scorched on country sale, as Javlinsky with the .

15

Re: [] Javlinsky - the best candidate

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A>> In 96 year Javlinsky would be the best variant, it is a pity that it then did not select. Ops> if backdating then Zhirinovsky, was precisely not worse , possibly it is better. And it was not scorched on country sale, as Javlinsky with the . I am afraid that it would begin  enemies of Russia,  the such do not forgive, and go us to be at war

16

Re: [] Javlinsky - the best candidate

Hello, wl., you wrote: wl.> I am afraid that it would begin  enemies of Russia,  the such do not forgive, and go us to be at war All this  - on audience only. Note, any "a boot in Indian ocean" never within the limits of pre-election at it was.

17

Re: [] Javlinsky - the best candidate

Hello, Bjorn Skalpe, you wrote: BS> Abruptly... Javlinsky does not forbid... I will follow it... Go. Look, only not in marriage. And fast, not .

18

Re: [] Javlinsky - the best candidate

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> It unsharp. And without a beard, i.e. not modern any.