1

Topic: without involvement in discussion

All greetings. Dear misters/companions!  it is created for live dialogue. We not a news site and especially not a site for . From the author of a subject visitors of a forum expect live discussion. Just alexanderfedin earned 12  baths for violation of this rule. The request to remaining visitors to remember that deviation from answers conducts the durable time to a bath. Remember that  a place for discussions, instead of for silent . It concerns all. So if got a subject, be so kind as to answer asked in it a question. Otherwise at once red  (and it at us square) and (depending on nonsense/emptiness) subject removal.

2

Re: without involvement in discussion

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD>... 12 ... And how many it is years in earth numeration?

3

Re: without involvement in discussion

Hello, BOBKA_XPEH, you wrote: BOB> And how many it is years in earth numeration? Something Vlad already long does not answer...

4

Re: without involvement in discussion

VD>>... 12 ... BOB> And how many it is years in earth numeration? 1 hour equals to seven earth years.

5

Re: without involvement in discussion

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: VD>>>... 12 ... BOB>> And how many it is years in earth numeration? T> 1 hour equals to seven earth years. And one  is how many? And that their whole 12...

6

Re: without involvement in discussion

VD> the Request to remaining visitors to remember that deviation from answers conducts the durable time to a bath. Remember that  a place for discussions, instead of for silent . It concerns all. VD> so if got a subject, be so kind as to answer asked in it a question. Otherwise at once red  (and it at us square) and (depending on nonsense/emptiness) subject removal. This rule concerns only got subjects? It becomes sometimes simple discussion in a branch simply uninteresting and it would not be desirable to participate in it. Apprx. on it I will simply inform. Type "I merged"

7

Re: without involvement in discussion

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> All greetings. Good morning! VD> just alexanderfedin earned 12  baths for violation of this rule. Resolutely I protest. And it is is specific against  alexanderfedin'a. While it silently outlined, I, for some reason, considered its clever, simply grown in hatred to Russia. And as soon as he started to answer... It would be desirable, that the opponent was at least the fairly clever person. And conducting discussion with..., itself you fall on its level.

8

Re: without involvement in discussion

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> So if got a subject, be so kind as to answer asked in it a question. And what period is led out on it?

9

Re: without involvement in discussion

Hello, MaximVK, you wrote: BOB>> And how many it is years in earth numeration? MVK> Something Vlad already long does not answer... .

10

Re: without involvement in discussion

Hello, qwertyuiop, you wrote: Q> And what period is led out on it? Whether forgot that? 10 12  without the correspondence right.

11

Re: without involvement in discussion

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> Just alexanderfedin earned 12  baths for violation of this rule. Here after all as... He sometimes answers with empty phrases about what. Formally - it is normal, and actually discussion "the fool - the fool" turns out.

12

Re: without involvement in discussion

Hello, qwertyuiop, you wrote: VD>> So if got a subject, be so kind as to answer asked in it a question. Q> and what period is led out on it?  - as a mirror of the state silly woman. It is more than laws, it is even more!

13

Re: without involvement in discussion

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: K> this rule concerns only got subjects? It becomes sometimes simple discussion in a branch simply uninteresting and it would not be desirable to participate in it. Apprx. on it I will simply inform. Type "I merged" Not, there is here a special category of writers which does not fall to answers. If to answer all questions laziness, this another.

14

Re: without involvement in discussion

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> the Request to remaining visitors to remember that deviation from answers conducts the durable time to a bath. And if you get to a bath because of any Cologne idiot who explicitly wants you together with itself in a bath to drag off?

15

Re: without involvement in discussion

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> So if got a subject, be so kind as to answer asked in it a question. Otherwise at once red  (and it at us square) and (depending on nonsense/emptiness) subject removal. And what, if the person creates a sensitive issue, and then it will have any unforeseen circumstances, and he in flow of any time cannot simply participate in discussion, it for it in square red  send?

16

Re: without involvement in discussion

VD>> So if got a subject, be so kind as to answer asked in it a question. Otherwise at once red  (and it at us square) and (depending on nonsense/emptiness) subject removal. Pzz> and what if the person creates a sensitive issue, and then it will have any unforeseen circumstances, and he in flow of any time cannot simply participate in discussion, it for it in square red  send? The law is the law. Even if at you the grandmother died, and you could not participate in the discussion begun by you - receive  on 12 . You can bring help from the pathologist or from funeral bureau then probably moderator even apologizes.

17

Re: without involvement in discussion

Hello, Muxa, you wrote: M> the Law is the law. M>... Then probably moderator even apologizes... Also throws 12 more , without looking at merits of the Cologne Egyptian vulture

18

Re: without involvement in discussion

19

Re: without involvement in discussion

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: K> this rule concerns only got subjects? Yes.

20

Re: without involvement in discussion

Hello, qwertyuiop, you wrote: Q> And what period is led out on it? We not animals. Formally  not we will. But if it starts to be evident, as with Fedenym, you have only yourselves to blame. To you no claims are present. With Fedenym I notified him during a week and without surprising understanding by its end took measures.

21

Re: without involvement in discussion

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> Here after all as... He sometimes answers with empty phrases about what. Formally - it is normal, and actually discussion "the fool - the fool" turns out. Let though begins. And that simply outlines and disappears. And there we look.

22

Re: without involvement in discussion

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: Pzz> And what if the person creates a sensitive issue, and then it will have any unforeseen circumstances, and he in flow of any time cannot simply participate in discussion, it for it in square red  send? For the single-valued case will be nothing. It is a question about systematic .

23

Re: without involvement in discussion

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> So if got a subject, be so kind as to answer asked in it a question. Otherwise at once red  (and it at us square) and (depending on nonsense/emptiness) subject removal. How about an advertizing wave ""? One in one described behavior.

24

Re: without involvement in discussion

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> As about an advertizing wave ""? One in one described behavior. They with us agreed personally. And they promise to make so that our questions were visible at them, and users could answer directly there and this answer will get to us. Well, and  is not engaged . It is quite deserved firm.

25

Re: without involvement in discussion

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> They with us agreed personally. And they promise to make so that our questions were visible at them, and users could answer directly there and this answer will get to us. VD> well, and  is not engaged . It is quite deserved firm. And, well apprx. Sponsors are sacred.