1

Topic: Rainbow

The rainbow of the healthy person looks so: To () About () ()  ()  () With ()  () And as though  did not try to pervert it, the Nature is relentless

2

Re: Rainbow

The test for attentiveness: how many colors in an iridescent flag?

3

Re: Rainbow

Hello, wl., you wrote: wl.> the Rainbow of the healthy person looks so: It is the conditional rainbow: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow#N … or_rainbow wl.> And as though  did not try to pervert it, Colours there was a different amount: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_flag_ (LGBT_movement) #History wl.> the Nature is relentless the Nature here at all at what.

4

Re: Rainbow

Hello, wl., you wrote: wl.> And as though  did not try to pervert it, the Nature is relentless  are not connected to a rainbow. They are connected with any European .

5

Re: Rainbow

Hello, wl., you wrote: wl.> the Rainbow of the healthy person looks so: wl.> To () wl.> About () wl.> () wl.>  () wl.>  () wl.> With () wl.>  () wl.> And as though  did not try to pervert it, the Nature is relentless Personally for me unisex relations occupy in concept  somewhere one of the last places For me it something . But for understanding of it it is necessary to write a lot of text, all of you equally do not master. In particular, it is necessary to consider explicitly concept "slavery " and the reasons of the protest against this slavery; the philosophical concept of time; also that the most terrible - to address to the theory of colleague Shmj about "", but at much more serious level. But it is possible is very short. The nature as you speak, is relentless. But what such the nature? It is constant struggle; it is a pain, fear, death. They are hunters and pheasants in eternal  aggression and struggle for existence. Now you the hunter - but entropy are relentless, and time comes and you inevitably will become a victim. In it a nature relentlessness. What made ? They told: we want to Love each other out of a context of evolution and natural selection. To us  on that that in a flow of time we will not have descendants, we put the Love above all it. That is it is idea of setting of the Person above the Nature, above Evolution, above God. Here in it for me, and at all the main sense also consists in primitive "one-cavity" or "" relations.

6

Re: Rainbow

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> Personally for me unisex relations occupy in concept  somewhere one of the last places For me it something . But for understanding of it it is necessary to write a lot of text, all of you equally do not master. And that there to master? Activism of a brain at  cases when active workers were is normal-oriented are known, known also. It is similar ,  or , any shift in a brain.

7

Re: Rainbow

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> And that there to master? Activism of a brain at  cases when active workers were is normal-oriented are known, known also. It is similar ,  or , any shift in a brain. It is possible to tell as "shift in a brain", I even wrote what: people do not want to be only small screws in the nature machine.

8

Re: Rainbow

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> It is possible to tell as "shift in a brain", I even wrote what: people do not want to be only small screws in the nature machine. Not, they simply toil with a nonsense, and even with fat rage. In the world there is a heap of real problems, and they, being , go to struggle for the rights of gays. Well, approximately as muzhiks-feminists, it is fine there women moved down, but it what for them to join?

9

Re: Rainbow

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> That made ? They told: we want to Love each other out of a context of evolution and natural selection. You as  the girl confuse love and to fuck.

10

Re: Rainbow

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> That made ? They told: we want to Love each other out of a context of evolution and natural selection. To us  on that that in a flow of time we will not have descendants, we put the Love above all it. That is it is idea of setting of the Person above the Nature, above Evolution, above God. A> here in it for me, and at all the main sense also consists in primitive "one-cavity" or "" relations. Yes let though   ( that from them to cross out, let both will be). But it is not normal and without propagation.

11

Re: Rainbow

BS> the Test for attentiveness: how many colors in an iridescent flag? .

12

Re: Rainbow

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> But it is possible is very short. The nature as you speak, is relentless. But what such the nature? It is constant struggle only in struggle development

13

Re: Rainbow

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> Personally for me unisex relations occupy in concept  somewhere one of the last places For me it something . But for understanding of it it is necessary to write a lot of text, all of you equally do not master. In particular, it is necessary to consider explicitly concept "slavery " and the reasons of the protest against this slavery; the philosophical concept of time; also that the most terrible - to address to the theory of colleague Shmj about "", but at much more serious level. And to ,  and to pedophiles it concerns?

14

Re: Rainbow

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> Not, they simply toil with a nonsense, and even with fat rage. In the world there is a heap of real problems, and they, being , go to struggle for the rights of gays. Well, approximately as muzhiks-feminists, it is fine there women moved down, but it what for them to join? Because the most part of problems is generated sotsial-darvinistvujushchimi by fascists who create them following natural instincts: to the maximum continuation and support by resources some kind of for the account  resources at others. Both wars, and crimes, both corruption, and poverty, and an inequality have the reason it.  the community (being certainly it is real Community instead of a small group a horse-radish knows whom) could become a basis of the international force, capable to eradicate these problems on fundamental level. But for this purpose it is necessary to create at first such Community that in general and is the task-maximum for such as I.

15

Re: Rainbow

Hello, Nik, you wrote: N> And to ,  and to pedophiles it concerns? No, does not concern at all

16

Re: Rainbow

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: a>  the community (being certainly it is real Community instead of a small group a horse-radish knows whom) could become a basis of the international force, capable to eradicate these problems on fundamental level. But for this purpose it is necessary to create at first such Community that in general and is the task-maximum for such as I. And you know, what this letter you break the law? avalon/2.0.3

17

Re: Rainbow

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: a> Personally for me unisex relations occupy in concept  somewhere one of the last places For me it something . But for understanding of it it is necessary to write a lot of text, all of you equally do not master. In particular, it is necessary to consider explicitly concept "slavery " and the reasons of the protest against this slavery; the philosophical concept of time; also that the most terrible - to address to the theory of colleague Shmj about "", but at much more serious level. a> but it is possible is very short. The nature as you speak, is relentless. But what such the nature? It is constant struggle; it is a pain, fear, death. They are hunters and pheasants in eternal  aggression and struggle for existence. Now you the hunter - but entropy are relentless, and time comes and you inevitably will become a victim. In it a nature relentlessness. a> that made ? They told: we want to Love each other out of a context of evolution and natural selection. To us  on that that in a flow of time we will not have descendants, we put the Love above all it. That is it is idea of setting of the Person above the Nature, above Evolution, above God. a> here in it for me, and at all the main sense also consists in primitive "one-cavity" or "" relations. You justify the  from norm? avalon/2.0.3

18

Re: Rainbow

A> is not present, does not concern at all and why? In a case , it too can after all be pleasant to an animal. And in a case  - a shit nobody asks

19

Re: Rainbow

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: N>> And to ,  and to pedophiles it concerns? A> is not present, does not concern at all I.e. you play the hypocrite and against the free love, yes?

20

Re: Rainbow

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> Here in it for me, and at all the main sense also consists in primitive "one-cavity" or "" relations. By the way that noted. You here showed off, and you aspire to peck. You, for certain, will name it a homophobia. However, here at a forum there is a person who, unlike you, openly admitted the orientation, but nobody etches it. Also you know, why? It does not carry propagation, as you.

21

Re: Rainbow

Hello, wl., you wrote: wl.> the Rainbow of the healthy person looks so: wl.> To () wl.> About () wl.> () wl.>  () wl.>  () wl.> With () wl.>  () the Rainbow of the healthy person looks so: It is hardcore level.

22

Re: Rainbow

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: N>> And to ,  and to pedophiles it concerns? A> is not present, does not concern at all And than you differ from sotsial-darvinistvujushchih fascists?

23

Re: Rainbow

Hello, DenisCh, you wrote: DC> And you know, what this letter you break the law? Which?

24

Re: Rainbow

Hello, DenisCh, you wrote: DC> you Justify the  from norm? Me do not interest at all norms, especially justifications before someone. I speak that I think also all.

25

Re: Rainbow

Hello, Los Chtostrjaslos, you wrote: A>> But it is possible is very short. The nature as you speak, is relentless. But what such the nature? It is constant struggle > only in struggle development It is the statement very interesting in itself. Here there are two moments 1. A certain absolute value of development 2 is meant. Affirms that struggle - a unique way of achievement of this value Anybody never strictly proved it. And me alternative possibilities just interest. Whether so development actually is valuable? Whether is it stimulated response to growth of entropy and one-directivity of time? Whether alternatives are possible here? And, if to be restricted to frames of growing entropy, whether there are the alternatives to struggle providing resistance of entropy and development?