1

Topic: : 10 entertaining facts about

In the end of September, 2017 organs of ecological control of Germany and France sounded the alarm: the cloud of radioactive ruthenium-106 covered all Europe. Dangers to the population were not, but concern of Europeans could be understood: after all in transfer from Latin this element is called as "Russian". The origin of mysterious burst and remains secret. However, to that to be surprised, if it is a question about . We suppose that nix.ru it will be curious to unlimited readership to get acquainted with a selection of the entertaining facts about this metal. After all it meets and in products in which trades . By preparation of this material the given lectures .. were used., professors of Moscow technological university T.M. , read in the Central house of scientists on November, 29th, 2017, and other materials. To read further the link

2

Re: : 10 entertaining facts about

Hello, rustler, you wrote: Can these pollution from tests our new  about which Putin spoke?

3

Re: : 10 entertaining facts about

Hello, Evgeniy Skvortsov, you wrote: ES> Can these pollution from tests our new  about which Putin spoke? Not. He did not tell that it tested with the reactor, and the reactor will not spoil 106 ruthenium, reactors so do not work.

4

Re: : 10 entertaining facts about

Hello, Nik, you wrote: N> Not. He did not tell that it tested with the reactor, and the reactor will not spoil 106 ruthenium, reactors so do not work. Well figs it knows. If it not the bluff it was a question of any unique development, can any new principles there are used. I generally even cannot imagine as such small reactor works.

5

Re: : 10 entertaining facts about

Hello, Evgeniy Skvortsov, you wrote: N>> Not. He did not tell that it tested with the reactor, and the reactor will not spoil 106 ruthenium, reactors so do not work. ES> well figs it knows. If it not the bluff it was a question of any unique development, can any new principles there are used. ES> I generally even cannot imagine as such small reactor works. Division is division, it is probability also one isotope cannot quit.

6

Re: : 10 entertaining facts about

Hello, Nik, you wrote: N> Not. He did not tell that it tested with the reactor, and the reactor will not spoil 106 ruthenium, reactors so do not work. The American analog worked so. Not ruthenium, but spoiled strongly. The small sizes of the reactor and good radio protection are badly compatible.

7

Re: : 10 entertaining facts about

Hello, wildwind, you wrote: N>> Not. He did not tell that it tested with the reactor, and the reactor will not spoil 106 ruthenium, reactors so do not work. W> the American analog worked so. Not ruthenium, but spoiled strongly. Reactors spoil to all successively, and notorious burst consisted of one isotope of ruthenium.

8

Re: : 10 entertaining facts about

Hello, Nik, you wrote: N> Reactors spoil to all successively, and notorious burst consisted of one isotope of ruthenium. And so also there is a thought, the reactor not so nuclear, and the isotopic can there. Well that is the active zone with a certain isotope  in something another under the influence of any particles (neutrons) and an exterior source of these particles, with heat selection. But to estimate a reality of the similar circuit I will not undertake, simply wild idea.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

9

Re: : 10 entertaining facts about

Hello, pagid, you wrote: N>> Reactors spoil to all successively, and notorious burst consisted of one isotope of ruthenium. P> and so also there is a thought, the reactor not so nuclear, and the isotopic can there. Well that is the active zone with a certain isotope  in something another under the influence of any particles (neutrons) and an exterior source of these particles, with heat selection. But to estimate a reality of the similar circuit I will not undertake, simply wild idea. , here estimate - at you should be  powerful (on many orders more powerfully  a nuclear reactor)  (differently burns generally all) a source of neutrons. And what for there ruthenium if from neutrons traditionally suggest to put to decay uranium, for energy release? And not, all the dirty exhaust would be.