1

Topic: Development inside

Somebody practises guiding of all development of a software inside  that in case of sudden problems with a working computer it was possible to tear quickly a work environment on ? Couple of years back when at me filched a working notebook, did  with Windows on  wives - it was gloomy, but on "temporarily to be interrupted" quite sufficed. Here also I think, how much such it turns out at a permanent job. The situation becomes complicated also that software debugging too goes in  with  nuclear debuggers (WinDbg). Now all it works "in" the working machine, and by operation in  will be "outside", and it is necessary to organize interaction somehow. If who has an experience of such operation - share, please.

2

Re: Development inside

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote: Can think is easier about  development environments at image? The blessing a software allows. If something happens took tore on new iron (I think to setting  fire wood serviceability it will be recovered) or on old if simply OS died.  in  which layout does not depend on OS. And at container connection in way system are adjusted according to development environment adjustments. Nevertheless on real iron to conduct nuclear debugging in Windbg is much more comfortable, than to do too most of . And suddenly it was necessary we tell USB the device in system with a development environment, and to virtualize devices - that still occupation.

3

Re: Development inside

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote: I eat> Somebody practises guiding of all development of a software inside  that in case of sudden problems with a working computer it was possible to tear quickly a work environment on ? All operation on  .

4

Re: Development inside

I eat> did  with Windows on  wives - it was gloomy, but on "temporarily to be interrupted" quite sufficed. Here also I think, how much such it turns out at a permanent job. On notebooks slowly, the normal computer both SSD is necessary. And  it is necessary to be able to adjust not to receive deceleration several times for what. For fast recovery there is still a variant to load windows with vhd.

5

Re: Development inside

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote: I eat> If who has an experience of such operation - share, please. Tell is not present to development inside ! Experience is,  the negative.

6

Re: Development inside

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote: I eat> Somebody practises guiding of all development of a software inside  that in case of sudden problems with a working computer it was possible to tear quickly a work environment on ? I so work. Host Windows 10, visitor Ubuntu 16.04. I develop on Java in the core. From problems only the webcam falling off periodically.

7

Re: Development inside

Hello, bnk, you wrote: bnk> Experience is,  the negative. Got to ?

8

Re: Development inside

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote: Yes, is. Especially positive. On MacOS inside Parallels in Windows 7 I program in VisualStudio 2015 with usage Qt - any brakes. If there is a question " such complexities", will tell that the main development goes on MacOS and iOS, development for Windows - is simple that was.

9

Re: Development inside

Hello, GarryIV, you wrote: GIV> Got to ? Yes all the same that the rubber woman. , interaction possibilities are strongly restricted. Though it is safe, yes.

10

Re: Development inside

VMWare Workstation the Host: Ubuntu 16.04 / Windows 10, the visitor: Ubuntu 16.04 / MacOS. It was necessary to refuse from Shared Folders - on a host with Ubuntu they caused damages of file system of the visitor. In what business, and did not understand. I am insolent  on an exterior disk. Earlier also worked directly from it. It was necessary to refuse - USB connection fell off periodically both on Windows, and on Ubuntu hosts that led to crash file on the visitor. The main worker  - Ubuntu. I select under it 6-7 . On a host it is better to have 32 , at me 16 - does not suffice.

11

Re: Development inside

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote: I eat> Somebody practises guiding of all development of a software inside  that in case of sudden problems with a working computer it was possible to tear quickly a work environment on ? I eat> Couple of years back when at me filched a working notebook, did  with Windows on  wives - it was gloomy, but on "temporarily to be interrupted" quite sufficed. Here also I think, how much such it turns out at a permanent job. I eat> the Situation becomes complicated also that software debugging too goes in  with  nuclear debuggers (WinDbg). Now all it works "in" the working machine, and by operation in  will be "outside", and it is necessary to organize interaction somehow. I eat> If who has an experience of such operation - share, please. For a long time already so I work using Vmware Workstation. Nuclear debuggers work without problems from  in another . And on COM to ports, and on a network. It is necessary only SSD and more  - any brakes, and it is very convenient in sense  and transferrings on other working machine. The last year even more promoted - took the server in Hetzner, all kindly delivered it on it, I am connected far off and I work there. There are small time delays of the response, but to work quite conveniently, and the most important thing - it can is necessary to work whence, it is not necessary to drag with itself powerful and heavy , to spend money for its upgrade and a heap of other small pluses. The only thing - access to an Internet but while with it anywhere problems were not is necessary.  on any I do.

12

Re: Development inside

Hello, _f_b_i _, you wrote: ___> Can think is easier about  development environments at image? Here I in an adjacent subject just search for a software for catalog tree or section mirroring in real time. Yet did not find. And a transferable work environment once again it wanted after on a warranty beech beat out one of LEDs of illumination of the screen. I at all note every day it, but once after all it is necessary to repair, and about repair on a warranty within two-three days hardly I will agree - it will be easier matrix to change.

13

Re: Development inside

Hello, v6, you wrote: v6> All operation on  . It something network? Then it is not necessary.

14

Re: Development inside

Hello, Osaka, you wrote: O> On notebooks slowly, the normal computer and SSD is necessary. I work five years exceptional on notebooks with  processors and SSD - quite suffices. O> and  it is necessary to be able to adjust I Am able. O> for fast recovery there is still a variant to load windows with vhd. Than it will differ from swap SSD/HDD in other computer?

15

Re: Development inside

Hello, 3dlev, you wrote: 3> Nuclear debuggers work without problems from  in another . And on COM to ports, and on a network. On COM-ports it too slowly, I in the core use VirtualKD. WinDbg normally supports the virtual network adapters VMware? 3> it can is necessary to work whence, it is not necessary to drag with itself powerful and heavy , to spend money for its upgrade and a heap of other small pluses. The only thing - access to an Internet but while with it anywhere problems were not is necessary. It you happen only in very civilized places. Even in Europe many apartments/houses surrender without stationary connection, and mobile there work, as carries.

16

Re: Development inside

O>> For fast recovery there is still a variant to load windows with vhd. I eat> Than it will differ from swap SSD/HDD in other computer? Obviously,  iron is not required, enough to copy a file.

17

Re: Development inside

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote: I eat> the Situation becomes complicated also that software debugging too goes in  with  nuclear debuggers (WinDbg). Now all it works "in" the working machine, and by operation in  will be "outside", and it is necessary to organize interaction somehow. I eat> If who has an experience of such operation - share, please. Held in VirtualBox a work environment: Windows 7, a Visual studio 2008 (a C, a C ++), Eclipse, Java, IBM WMQ several versions, MySQL, postgres. Normally worked and wandered between a desktop and . Brakes was not. But a software of application-oriented, any exotic.

18

Re: Development inside

Hello, Osaka, you wrote: O>>> For fast recovery there is still a variant to load windows with vhd. I eat>> Than it will differ from swap SSD/HDD in other computer? O> it is obvious,  iron is not required, enough to copy a file. I will remind, decisions are studied just on a case sudden  working iron (a variant - planned delivery of this in repair). Where and than in that case to copy without  gland?

19

Re: Development inside

I eat> I Will remind, decisions are studied just on a case sudden  working iron (a variant - planned delivery of this in repair). Where and than in that case to copy without  gland? From a backup copy on a spare computer.

20

Re: Development inside

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote: I eat> If who has an experience of such operation - share, please. I passed to development exceptional in  houses:) sredne-popular projects  first of all go under , the Windows became secondary if  is (for example Scala.native) I prefer unix-way; consoles normal in Windows as was not and are not present "normal"  on a notebook ==  in , as with  iron there are problems (for example the Nvidia optimus)  all"becomes rsync th for two seconds on other carrier the C computer ++ (Studio I do not use), intellij works perfectly Brakes I do not note (i7,32GB, SSD), but I do not drive the heavy drawing

21

Re: Development inside

Hello, Osaka, you wrote: O> On notebooks slowly, the normal computer both SSD is necessary. And  it is necessary to be able to adjust not to receive deceleration several times for what.  with Core i7 and SSD, hardware support of virtualization - any problems: load time 5-10 , start of studio of steam of seconds to open the project ~5  subjectively my virtual Win7 where  than  Win10 at colleagues on powerful  (because of an antivirus and updates).

22

Re: Development inside

Hello, Skorodum, you wrote: S> subjectively my virtual Win7 where  than  Win10 at colleagues on powerful  And at you a host what system? At me while Win7, but in it periodically happen long (on hundreds milliseconds) brakes in acpi.sys, tcpip.sys, ndis.sys, usbport.sys. Tell lies that in ten part of these brakes . If  with Win7 under it will quickly work - I will think of moving under ten.

23

Re: Development inside

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote: I eat> And at you with a host what system?  . I eat> At me while Win7, but in it periodically happen long (on hundreds milliseconds) brakes in acpi.sys, tcpip.sys, ndis.sys, usbport.sys. Tell lies that in ten part of these brakes . It something specific to your machine, IMHO. I eat> If  with Win7 under it will quickly work - I will think of moving under ten. Only if without autoupdates

24

Re: Development inside

Hello, Skorodum, you wrote: I eat>> At me while Win7, but in it periodically happen long (on hundreds milliseconds) brakes in acpi.sys, tcpip.sys, ndis.sys, usbport.sys. Tell lies that in ten part of these brakes . S> It something specific to your machine, IMHO. Aha, and for 100500 different machines. Feed to Google request "windows latency (acpi | ndis | usbport)". And the machines check up in LatencyMon. I eat>> I will think of moving under ten. S> only if without autoupdates By itself. They at me and in the seven are not present.