1

Topic: Than in Windows files in real time?

For reliability augmentation it would be desirable instead of periodic  to have mirroring of the given file set (the source codes, different texts/pictures, containers of virtual disks, etc.) on other physical carrier. Found darkness of a software for directory synchronization, but all this software stupidly copies the changed files entirely even if the unique unit is re-recorded. In addition it cannot work with the files opened in not divided mode (as virtual disks). As a matter of fact, the decision at the file system level, tracing creation/change/removal of files, and doubling these operations on other carrier is necessary. Is such for Windows 7?

2

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote: I eat> For reliability augmentation it would be desirable instead of periodic  to have mirroring of the given file set (the source codes, different texts/pictures, containers of virtual disks, etc.) on other physical carrier. Found darkness of a software for directory synchronization, but all this software stupidly copies the changed files entirely even if the unique unit is re-recorded. In addition it cannot work with the files opened in not divided mode (as virtual disks). I eat> As a matter of fact, the decision at the file system level, tracing creation/change/removal of files, and doubling these operations on other carrier is necessary. I eat> Is such for Windows 7? The Network drive. And on other end samba and lvm with snapshot both copy-on-write and any trick to taste.

3

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote: I eat> As a matter of fact, the decision at the file system level, tracing creation/change/removal of files, and doubling these operations on other carrier is necessary. I eat> Is such for Windows 7? RAID 1?

4

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote: I eat> Is such for Windows 7? Directly required - I do not know. But operation in something of type DropBox (or ownCloud on the server) does not approach? On reliability will exceed considerably the circuit with duplication on a disk. On  - enciphering nobody cancelled. Plus to it the code in the end of day  in closed   or  (or on the server).

5

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote: I eat> As a matter of fact, the decision at the file system level, tracing creation/change/removal of files, and doubling these operations on other carrier is necessary. I eat> Is such for Windows 7? There was certain Windows File History, but it only for Win8 and above. It is possible to search for analogs for early versions.  can do incremental .

6

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote: I eat> As a matter of fact, the decision at the file system level, tracing creation/change/removal of files, and doubling these operations on other carrier is necessary. I eat> Is such for Windows 7? Since win xp https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_Copy

7

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote: I eat> As a matter of fact, the decision at the file system level, tracing creation/change/removal of files, and doubling these operations on other carrier is necessary. I eat> Is such for Windows 7? Itself for a long time I search.

8

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Stanislaw K, you wrote: SK> Since win xp SK> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_Copy It at level UX curve, also does not meet HARDWARE requirements (at me similar). Thus that service - a piece useful, and indirect programs can use it.

9

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, kov_serg, you wrote: _> the Network drive. It is too bulky - I am regularly dragged on the world with a working notebook, will carry/decompose/turn off all it too troublesome.

10

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Sergeant_BY, you wrote: S_B> RAID 1? I do not need the full mirror of a disk - a maximum of working section, and it is even better - several process directories.

11

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Nuzhny, you wrote: N> operation in something of type DropBox (or ownCloud on the server) does not approach? If worldwide there was round the clock stable, high-speed and not too expensive Internet - would approach.

12

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

13

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote: I eat> Someone from them is able to trace (without total scanning) changes in, say, 15-gigabajtnom a file, and to copy only the changed sections, instead of all file entirely? Look here: https://kb.acronis.com/content/13534

14

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Stanislaw K, you wrote: SK> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_Copy It is not able to copy the files opened in not divided mode, to copy only the changed sections of the big files.

15

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote: _>> the Network drive. I eat> it is too bulky - I am regularly dragged on the world with a working notebook, will carry/decompose/turn off all it too troublesome. So what for you drag the worker  with bulky Windows? Drag  with  where all it is.

16

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Glory, you wrote: Look here: https://kb.acronis.com/content/13534 Hm, the strange algorithm. At it as a result it should turn out incremental , instead of a mirror. If anything I will not find better - I will try.

17

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> Itself for a long time I search. On arguings found MirrorFolder - in the description like promise mirroring at level . Did not try it?

18

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, kov_serg, you wrote: _> So what for you drag the worker  with bulky Windows? In order that development at me it is exceptional under Windows, and preferentially under a kernel. To be engaged in it from under  it is possible only in VM, of it too I think. But in this case  helps unless  virtual disks VM. _> Drag  with  where all it is. From what pores  became less bulky? As though the seven did not appear less bulky, than last .

19

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote:> Look here:>> https://kb.acronis.com/content/13534 I eat> Hm, the strange algorithm. At it as a result it should turn out incremental , instead of a mirror. If anything I will not find better - I will try. In the same place it is told - at first full , then incremental.

20

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Glory, you wrote: In the same place it is told - at first full , then incremental. So I do not want the incremental. I want a mirror - the full copy, in an ideal - a catalog tree, at the worst - section.

21

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Ops, you wrote: SK>> Since win xp SK>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_Copy Ops> It at level UX curve, Minimum, hardly is more  than technology. Ops> also does not meet HARDWARE requirements (at me similar). Thus that service - a piece useful, and indirect programs can use it. I think, I eat> On arguings found MirrorFolder it and uses.

22

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Stanislaw K, you wrote: SK> Minimum, hardly it is more  than technology. , and it would be desirable the decision. SK> I think, SK> I eat>> On arguings found MirrorFolder SK> it and uses. I, by the way, on motives of this subject dug a little, and found still GoodSync, it is at first sight quite good, though not without jambs with the interface, we look. Anyway, it is more convenient robocopy.

23

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Stanislaw K, you wrote: SK> I Think, SK> I eat>> On arguings found MirrorFolder SK> it and uses. I somehow tried to adjust standard  Backup for the regular copying of process directories - it regularly broke off on the files opened in not divided mode. So, if MirrorFolder it also uses, in more advanced mode.

24

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> found still GoodSync, it is at first sight quite good, though not without jambs with the interface And it is able to double changes in the big files without rescanning/comparison? In the description continuous bragging, and any technical details. Looks like 100501st variant of the banal synchronizer of files.

25

Re: Than in Windows files in real time?

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote: I eat> And it is able to double changes in the big files without rescanning/comparison? In the description continuous bragging, and any technical details. And how it to make, let theoretically? So that it was more effective than comparing. I eat> Looks like 100501st variant of the banal synchronizer of files. "Banal synchronizers of files" practically are not present these, there is one million curves very much, the authors made under tasks. Though itself write one more, with the same sores, but already under itself.