Hello, VladD2, you wrote: I Sympathize, but it is not surprised never. Go to lawyers, Vlad! VD> in general, in time the past from our last meeting the lady, as well as promised, went to higher instances and brought the new version of my violation. In, now I understood that the lawyer who made to me the appeal meant." The appeal it is made not on revising of your violation, and on violations by a legal investigation. And the decision should either cancel, or uphold, but your violation not to reconsider. Why? Because in this case it return in world court, therefrom in traffic police and there business acquires new particulars ". VD> As a result to me without special celebrations handed over the summons on 27 number. In 309 a section? VD> now questions for those who in a subject: VD> 1. Whether can form a safety islet two travelers of a part on two-band (in both sides) road? Purely intuitively - yes. It is necessary to smoke determinations attentively. And time they so told, means with ease refer to these determinations and points of traffic regulations. In ROM at Ignatov it is written well down And be by the way ready to that if you will object that" the islet does not form two travelers of a part "- you Petrov asks why, interrupts stop short and tells" well in general learn rules ". And still to that your violation acquires new particulars. Look (and is better consult!!! With the lawyer) - how to file video which have been removed by traffic police. Video even if it was even if on it you 100 times are guilty - "disappears". The written petition, referring to the necessary points of the necessary laws (what - I , I not the lawyer), with instructions of violation of your constitutional laws. He tells "video transferred in a call center, it there is stored in the ciphered type, and that with it I do not know". It will suit the judge. And here on this place it is possible to make a syllogism very much. The judge does not conduct the protocol. Writes something on pieces of paper, but there is a suspicion that these pieces of paper go to an urn right after meetings. VD> 2. How to prove, what the inspector distorted my path? I have video where he says that I "did not get nearly to road accident". Though there as any road accident also did not smell, but I am valid on sharper in front of turning machine as they went (in the beginning) without and I thought that it passes by. Once again he confirmed it in talk to an eagle from analysis group. Retelling of its words as is written down on a dictophone. You still do not trust in the scenario described by me? Though he to you on video admits directly that it plants you - the judge tells "to business it does not concern. Violation is - is. For it you carry punishment in the form of 4 months of deprivation". And to the inspector then submit the counterclaim, write complaints (I still "in business", if that!) Also assort ITS violations and excess of powers separately. Even "did not get nearly to road accident" is an aggravating circumstance, but at attempt to disassemble a detail - with whom the road accident, what sort (counter, or side, or caught up behind) - "business does not concern". If you want to go in the summer on a summer residence - search is better, how courts to postpone. But 2-3 months, more hardly turns out. : After two courts it became interesting to me. They always in the beginning tell "composition of court in the name of the judge such you arranges?". It is the same formality, as well as all court? That will if tell "is not present, does not arrange". Go to lawyers.