1

Topic: Masters of gnomes from

The console client for operation with a disk in adjustments downloaded it is possible to eliminate directories for synchronization and why that is not present adjustment to set directories only for synchronization really it not obviously that it is necessary to add? Who accepted this operation, who test silt? Yes any tester would specify at once that such adjustment is necessary

2

Re: Masters of gnomes from

Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: > and why that is not present adjustment to set directories only for synchronization Probably you simply did not find, but generally certainly well to give  a hammer, yes on a head.

3

Re: Masters of gnomes from

Hello, Glory, you wrote: Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: >> and why that is not present adjustment to set directories only for synchronization Probably you simply did not find, but generally certainly well to give  a hammer, yes on a head. https://yandex.ru/support/disk/cli-clie … ion-params searched

4

Re: Masters of gnomes from

Hello, Glory, you wrote: >> and why that is not present adjustment to set directories only for synchronization Probably you simply did not find, but generally certainly well to give  a hammer, yes on a head. In my opinion, it is good not only on a head, but also on all remaining extremities appearing from a body. Not, I understand, programs difficult, but sometimes  something such that differently as the approach " and in " I can not explain. Well it is fine, I , what demand from me, but these inhabitants of heaven participating in development  ++ - and such ? For example, I go recently, any moronic message out of the blue gets out of the navigator on all screen with the text like "Possibility is not supported".

5

Re: Masters of gnomes from

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: ARK> Not, I understand, programs difficult, but sometimes  something such that differently as the approach " and in " I can not explain. Well it is fine, I , what demand from me, but these inhabitants of heaven participating in development  ++ - and such ? For example, I go recently, any moronic message out of the blue gets out of the navigator on all screen with the text like "Possibility is not supported". They also inadequately react to a bug-reporty. About one and a half years ago me   some bugs in their services. I selected time, , collected all necessary  for playback of bugs, specified where and in what at them problems and as them . The answer came  - from me requested phone, a residence permit,  the passport (and it commanded to bring in a paper type in their office). Further - instructions on any form where to me it is necessary observing to describe anew any rules bugs "under the form". To tell that I was ** is nothing to tell. It was necessary to wave  with the pen and to tell greetings to Google.

6

Re: Masters of gnomes from

Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: > and why that is not present adjustment to set directories only for synchronization Something I did not understand, it is next  on Linux or a recognition of the superiority of the free software?

7

Re: Masters of gnomes from

Hello, Anton Batenev, you wrote: AB> Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: >> and why that is not present adjustment to set directories only for synchronization AB> Something I did not understand, it is next  on Linux or a recognition of the superiority of the free software? It too most as if to deliver an armor door and instead of the lock a latch or absolutely without the lock

8

Re: Masters of gnomes from

AS> the Answer came  - from me requested phone, a residence permit,  the passport (and it commanded to bring in a paper type in their office). Further - instructions on any form where to me it is necessary observing to describe anew any rules bugs "under the form". AS> to Tell that I was ** is nothing to tell. It can they so to you love admitted on operation wanted to take, instead of did not estimate their creative HR

9

Re: Masters of gnomes from

Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: > the console client for operation with disk > in adjustments downloaded it is possible to eliminate directories for synchronization > and why that is not present adjustment to set directories only for synchronization > really it not obviously that it is necessary to add? Who accepted this operation, who test silt? > yes any tester would specify at once that such adjustment in support is necessary wrote that used exclude-dir though I asked as to make that 1 directory synchronized likely the occupied children, gnomes sort for the speed