51

Re: Google vs. Oracle

Hello, Cyberax, you wrote: S>> What for after all it was possible to throw out all unnecessary  from JDK? It was possible to add/expand API from JDK, it was possible not to pass the full test? It was possible to make all as made Google, but is not present. The C> In Amazone is interesting for developing to nobody new JDK. It is banal  it is not necessary. And it is necessary, .  grew rich? Here, start up now it will be spent, will be enclosed in happiness for all for nothing.

52

Re: Google vs. Oracle

Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M> on what still to write under , if not on java/kotlin? With ++/Qt

53

Re: Google vs. Oracle

Hello, Glory, you wrote: S>>> What for after all it was possible to throw out all unnecessary  from JDK? It was possible to add/expand API from JDK, it was possible not to pass the full test? It was possible to make all as made Google, but is not present. The C>> In Amazone is interesting for developing to nobody new JDK. It is banal  it is not necessary.> And it is necessary, .  grew rich? Here, start up now it will be spent, will be enclosed in happiness for all for nothing. What for? Normal JDK not bad works. There where works badly - it is used Zing. In other projects - an orthodox C ++ or even Rust.

54

Re: Google vs. Oracle

Hello, Glory, you wrote: I Think, in that case development from zero, and here it here all very rises... H'm, exulting  and overcast, it evaporates. I - for. Let gone too far  grows thin.

55

Re: Google vs. Oracle

Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M> on what still to write under , if not on java/kotlin? RAD Studio Delphi

56

Re: Google vs. Oracle

Hello, Skorodum, you wrote: S> Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M>> on what still to write under , if not on java/kotlin? S> With ++/Qt what for to me through NDK?

57

Re: Google vs. Oracle

Hello, Cyberax, you wrote: the C> If loses Google, it will be bad ALL. It will mean that API will be for copyright'. It can mean still the worst - appearance Is false-free API. When to the client  API as free, wait when the client will have money, then the client is gathered on the arbitrary total what takes in head.  after all knew that it API use, and did not notify that is going to cancel "". It would be valid to pass to court the decision - to give to Google time (though year 2) that  with it API, or to pay if it that costs. And so it is similar to swindle precedent, shock on branch IT.

58

Re: Google vs. Oracle

Hello, Silver_S, you wrote: S_S> Hello, Cyberax, you wrote: the C>> If loses Google, it will be bad ALL. It will mean that API will be for copyright'. S_S> It can mean still the worst - appearance Is false-free API. When to the client  API as free, wait when the client will have money, then the client is gathered on the arbitrary total what takes in head. /Sun gave such possibility in the form of OpenJDK, take and use. Google went the way means let meets with the deserts. S_S> Orakl after all knew that it API use, and did not notify that is going to cancel "". You confuse something  and open source, source codes are opened, it is necessary or not to pay for their usage is written to licenses. S_S> it would be valid to pass to court the decision - to give to Google time (though year 2) that  with it API, or to pay if it that costs. S_S> And so it is similar to swindle precedent, shock on branch IT. Yes shock on the swindler - to Google

59

Re: Google vs. Oracle

Hello, Cyberax, you wrote: a C> Hello, turbocode, you wrote:>>> And here on SQL the license from IBM nobody gave a C. So now it is possible to take ANY user SQL for . T>> SQL it is idea, instead of implementation. Cs> Spasibo Oraklu, now ideas can get under copyright. What ideas, we go down on the earth we take a file for example a file from AWT not concerning to  in any way: https://developer.android.com/reference … Range.html https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/a … Range.html Or for example: https://developer.android.com/reference … haper.html https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/a … haper.html In the documentation even code samples identical. Tell to me as so it turned out that Google created "c zero" a mobile platform in which is  concerning to awt???

60

Re: Google vs. Oracle

Hello, Silver_S, you wrote: S_S> Orakl after all knew that it API use, and did not notify that is going to cancel "".  since the moment purchase Sun did not hide that gathers has legal proceedings with Guglyoj. Moreover, according to the letters published on process, in Google too were well informed that against them can bring an action for implementation of the variant of Java with API. Moreover, already there was court Sun vs Microsoft approximately in the same occasion, with a crash lost last. Google well simply very much wanted to attack this rake.