Hello, Cyberax, you wrote: a C> Hello, serb, you wrote: the C>>> for the present lost nothing Google, there will be a further appeal. S>> if I am not mistaken that it lost, a question only in the price. The C> Is not present, there will be a following appeal further. We see. But like they already reached the highest authority where won, and now them sent to the lower instance to state to the total of losses. The C>>> If loses Google, it will be bad ALL. It will mean that API will be for copyright'. S>> Problems will be only at those who uses another's API (on which is copyright) for development of a competitive product not falling on "fair use". The C> Is not present. ANY API will be now under copyright'. And as copyright very infectious, also all derivatives API too. For example, for SQL it will be necessary to pay IBM, and for CSS - the Opera. It is a lie, esteem as Google it tried to be protected I use points "fair use" and at it almost it turned out. S>> It there was a lawlessness when google took all operating time of the Dignity constructed on them the infrastructure and started to earn grandmas. And it the license cost copecks.... It was necessary to arrive as made in Amazon, Azul, RedHat, the JetBrains, IBM, SAP and to attend to the license or to pass on openjdk. A C> Yes generally, continuous . Write requests on SQL, without giving the grandma to legal owners who SQL developed this, nonstop. The lie speech does not go about those who writes applications using interfaces java or language sql. But those who give the similar interface without the license yes fall as at remembered above MySQL (but only if IBM somewhere about it wrote). You answer is better why to Amazonu there are no claims and to Google is. As so Amazon such big but all the same tracks that how correctly to use java and openjdk.