76

Re: and Chrome OS all

Hello, Somescout, you wrote: S> As insertion filling. Or you expect  the installer on phone? I expect at least without a prayer "if only not a brick".

77

Re: and Chrome OS all

Hello, CreatorCray, you wrote: CC> Google receives Profit from advertizing and from information collection so almost any visited service for them is potentially profitable. Well do not tell. On service subjects can strongly depend, for example, % of the users, using disablers of advertizing and other . Well also it is profitable - does not mean yet that it is optimal, and it is impossible to earn more, translating  from its support to other tasks.

78

Re: and Chrome OS all

Hello, Sharov, you wrote: S>>> And?  an axis what for V>> For responsiveness and predictability of response. S> as there can be a responsiveness and  with the user? Responsiveness GUI, the EC th. For comparing, the adjacent flow expecting on a signal, finds out this signal in Windows in 2-3 times faster, than in . And all asynchrony just around  / flows dances. S> and with  a software what? With what it is is specific? S>>> than normal not that? V>> Realtajmovye also is normal for client side, and package are good for server side. S> a bucket not  an axis. Linux not , but for  there stick out  extensions-crutches. Well and  not an index, same not an independent axis, and only graphic jacket over another.

79

Re: and Chrome OS all

Hello, vdimas, you wrote: V> Responsiveness GUI, the EC th. V> for comparing, the adjacent flow expecting on a signal, finds out this signal in Windows in 2-3 times faster, than in . V> And all asynchrony just around  / flows dances. How here  helps? The kernel should be refined. S>> and with  a software what? V> with what it is is specific? With any. The person intentionally  Thread. Sleep (rand () *1000). How to be? V> Linux not , but for  there stick out  extensions-crutches. V> well and  not an index, same not an independent axis, and only graphic jacket over another. Well, what from mobile and  OS ?

80

Re: and Chrome OS all

Hello, vdimas, you wrote: V> Hello, Serginio1, you wrote: V>>> to yourself you contradict. S>> explain. Asp.Net Core it also is.Net Core V> technically Asp.Net Core is.Net Sandart + ASP.Net. V> But "engine" here serves Asp.Net, instead of Core. Technically on what works Asp.Net? S>> https://docs.microsoft.com/ru-ru/aspnet/core/ V> the Applications written for.NET Standard 2.0 are launched everywhere where there is a support.NET Standard 2.0. S>> what  on  a. net Framework? V> U-u-u... V>.NET Standard is only next version bake on.Net . V> Marketing  absolutely fluidifies head contents, I look... . Net Standard it  libraries which can simply be executed as on.Net Core and normal Frejmvorke. And so on  only Core. S>> As it generally will work ASP.Net on  without.NET Core V> Went begin to flow consciousnesses... . You the consciousness trace. S>> besides the main usage  it Azure. There it manages more cheaply. S>> then under your approach for Linux it is primary Azure. V> Even analogy you can not formulate. V> for cloud MS it is primary Azure, instead of Linux. Linux that is necessary exceptional from for Azure. On your logic 1 uses Veb of the client that is HTTP service. Whether , what for 1  HTTP service? Asp.Net Core a scanty part of usage of a heap of libraries and . And all it became possible, only with release.Net Core And.Net Core 2 quitted more recently, and in it there is a support.NET Standard 2.0. But also without it was Asp.Net but its possibilities were not great

81

Re: and Chrome OS all

Hello, vdimas, you wrote: V> It seems that you were never stuck in Xamarin Studio. V> Thus you run on all forums and you tell about advantage Xamarin. I do not work on Xamarin Studio it to me and it is not necessary. The editor is not necessary to me. To me it is necessary code portability. And the main thing in  is code portability, instead of . There all the same much not  for mobile that of devices. Also select it not for the sake of as you expressed Guja.

82

Re: and Chrome OS all

Hello, Serginio1, you wrote: S> And the main thing in  is code portability, instead of . S> There all the same much not  for mobile that of devices. Precisely, on  you will not draw much?)) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bsptX8MdPg S> also select it not for the sake of as you expressed Guja. For the sake of it, darling.

83

Re: and Chrome OS all

Hello, Sharov, you wrote: V>> For comparing, the adjacent flow expecting on a signal, finds out this signal in Windows in 2-3 times faster, than in . V>> And all asynchrony just around  / flows dances. S> as here  helps? The kernel should be refined. Well also other kernel is taken. S>>> and with  a software what? V>> with what it is is specific? S> with any. The person intentionally  Thread. Sleep (rand () *1000). How to be? As will work, as it is written. Unless wakes up not with accuracy 15.625 ms (1/64 in Windows NT and Linux), and is much more exact. V>> Linux not , but for  there stick out  extensions-crutches. V>> well and  not an index, same not an independent axis, and only graphic jacket over another. S> it is good, what from mobile and  OS ? Symbian OS, QNX/Blackberry, Windows CE/Phone/IoT, LynxOS, VxWorks, Nokia Asha.

84

Re: and Chrome OS all

Hello, vdimas, you wrote: V> Hello, Serginio1, you wrote: S>> And the main thing in  is code portability, instead of . S>> There all the same much not  for mobile that of devices. V> it is exact, on  you will not draw much?)) V> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bsptX8MdPg and? That that I there did not see anything abrupt, S>> And select it not for the sake of as you expressed Guja. V> for the sake of it, darling. . As this darling Xamarin. Forms will work without.Net Core? Actually  very much rejoiced Ry Jit at https://www.iotgadgets.com/2017/09/sams … tizen-4-0/ Note words about Xamarin. Forms. Thus, on it it is possible  to write simple  simply enough

85

Re: and Chrome OS all

Hello, Serginio1, you wrote: V>> it is exact, on  you will not draw much?)) V>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bsptX8MdPg S> and? That that I there did not see anything abrupt, It as the modern mobile applications at a design stage look.