1

Topic: Windows absolutely all

So, even MS recognized that the Windows on what are not suitable. Also took at last Linux: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/ … gent-edge/ Meanwhile only for IoT, but we know that to it will not be restricted. You give Windows Services for Linux!

2

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Cyberax, you wrote: Cs> So, even MS recognized that the Windows on what are not suitable. And what in it of positive? Windows is a whole epoch,  people fed.

3

Re: Windows absolutely all

Cs> So, even MS recognized that the Windows on what are not suitable. The Windows are suitable, but  is cheaper.

4

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Cyberax, you wrote: a C> Meanwhile only for IoT, but we know...... As in 20 years the percent  on a desktop does not change (*). (*) In the big side.

5

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Somescout, you wrote: a C>> Meanwhile only for IoT, but we know... S>... As in 20 years the percent  on a desktop does not change. And what we still know? That the percent of the desktop goes downwards prompt rates.

6

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Nuzhny, you wrote: N> And what we still know? That the percent of the desktop goes downwards prompt rates. So forward, develop a software on a pad who forbids you, lol. I do not eliminate that Windows disappears (especially considering policy MS the last years) though, , the chance of it is extremely small. But here in chance of that its place on a desktop occupies Linux even less. It will be faster MacOS.

7

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Somescout, you wrote: N>> And what we still know? That the percent of the desktop goes downwards prompt rates. S> so forward, develop a software on a pad who forbids you, lol. I will teach to read: if the percent something is reduced, its amount is not mandatory reduced. It can even grow! But more slowly, than, for example, pads and smart phones. Besides growth of the market of servers also exceeds desktops. L - Logic!

8

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Nuzhny, you wrote: N> I Will teach to read: if the percent something is reduced, its amount is not mandatory reduced. It can even grow! But more slowly, than, for example, pads and smart phones. Besides growth of the market of servers also exceeds desktops. N> l - Logic! Respected, I understand that at you  reads off scale, and you like to repeat obvious and all clear things, but nevertheless I will explain: to result that argument which you now resulted I did not become, because it, the pancake, is obvious.

9

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Somescout, you wrote: S> Respected, I understand that at you  reads off scale, and you like to repeat obvious and all clear things, but nevertheless I will explain: to result that argument which you now resulted I did not become, because it, the pancake, is obvious. I did not result any arguments. Also did not advance any theses. Learn to read, respected.

10

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Nuzhny, you wrote: S>> Respected, I understand that at you  reads off scale, and you like to repeat obvious and all clear things, but nevertheless I will explain: to result that argument which you now resulted I did not become, because it, the pancake, is obvious. N> I did not result any arguments. Also did not advance any theses. , . Something exchanged from it? N> Learn to read, respected. How to read ability is connected to that that you got to the bottom of a word? Well though about reading off scale   is not present.

11

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Somescout, you wrote: S> Ok, . Something exchanged from it? Yes, exchanged. It once again shows inability to read. Here experts in writing of a DBMS by means of plug-ins for AutoCard stated that it is better Windows for IoT than anything are not present. Against it quits  that itself the Microsoft uses Linux for this business! Whether "well a miracle?" And you with the desktop and lies. According to this statistics, Windows since 2009 lost 14 % on a desktop, and Linux share increased by 1 %. S> As to read ability is connected to that that you got to the bottom of a word? S> it is good though about reading off scale   is not present. What for to hide what is fine? As at you generally anything is not present.

12

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Nuzhny, you wrote: N> According to this statistics, Windows since 2009 lost 14 % on a desktop, and Linux share increased by 1 %. Well , it is fast ? And that I about 5 classes of school wait.

13

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, T4r4sB, you wrote: N>> According to this statistics, Windows since 2009 lost 14 % on a desktop, and Linux share increased by 1 %. TB> Well , it is fast ? And that I about 5 classes of school wait. No, not soon. It is not assured that it generally will be and is assured that it is not necessary.

14

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Nuzhny, you wrote: N> And what we still know? That the percent of the desktop goes downwards prompt rates. Thus the amount of desktops increases. There on background IoT  the share becomes absolutely scanty

15

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Serginio1, you wrote: N>> And what we still know? That the percent of the desktop goes downwards prompt rates. S> thus the amount of desktops increases. There on background IoT  the share becomes absolutely scanty! And the author of the message which I answered, unfortunately does not understand it. Suggests to develop on pads!??

16

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Nuzhny, you wrote: S>> Ok, . Something exchanged from it? N> yes, exchanged. It once again shows inability to read. ... Something you too  on this subject. There were problems in the childhood with reading? N> here experts in writing of a DBMS by means of plug-ins for AutoCard stated that it is better Windows for IoT than anything are not present. Against it quits  that itself the Microsoft uses Linux for this business! Whether "well a miracle?" And you with the desktop and lies. Well, well and where it I told lies, not respected? How about the citation? N> According to this statistics, Windows since 2009 lost 14 % on a desktop, and Linux share increased by 1 %. ...  achievement. Only here while linux rose on 0.8 %, OS X rose almost on 9 %. N> What for to hide what is fine? ... that the nonsense of everyone was visible!

17

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Somescout, you wrote: S> Well, well and where it I told lies, not respected? How about the citation? The very first message about Linux share on a desktop. It partly and  (a subject on IoT), well and Linux share grows against lowering of share Windows. So re-read. N>> According to this statistics, Windows since 2009 lost 14 % on a desktop, and Linux share increased by 1 %. S> Oooo...  achievement. Only here while linux rose on 0.8 %, OS X rose almost on 9 %. Well also what? It again . N>> What for to hide what is fine? S> ... that the nonsense of everyone was visible! Showed, so showed! , lies and passage to persons. Offset to you.

18

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Nuzhny, you wrote: N> the Very first message about Linux share on a desktop. It partly and  (a subject on IoT), well and Linux share grows against lowering of share Windows. So re-read.... As in 20 years the percent  on a desktop does not change. Probably about reading I got to a point to you to decrypt a sentence? S>> Oooo...  achievement. Only here while linux rose on 0.8 %, OS X rose almost on 9 %. N> Well also what? It again . I do not eliminate that Windows disappears (especially considering policy MS the last years) though, , the chance of it is extremely small. But here in chance of that its place on a desktop occupies Linux even less. It will be faster MacOS. N> showed, so showed! , lies and passage to persons. Offset to you. You the good fellow, truth: getting into a mess strenuously pretend that today simply hot day.

19

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Somescout, you wrote: S>... As in 20 years the percent  on a desktop does not change. S> I am visible about reading in a point got to you to decrypt a sentence? All it is ridiculous, because a trend for 10 years suggest otherwise: Linux share grows. Considering that its share not on a desktop grows even faster it is possible to draw an output on perspectives for 20 years. S> I do not eliminate that Windows disappears (especially considering policy MS the last years) though, , the chance of it is extremely small. But here in chance of that its place on a desktop occupies Linux even less. It will be faster MacOS. And I eliminate, from what it to disappear? What comes in exchange? What premises? Though one fact you will result? S> you the good fellow, truth: getting into a mess strenuously pretend that today simply hot day. Aha, aha. Got into a mess with the facts on hands. And you, probably, stand an ass up, here it and is pure.

20

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Nuzhny, you wrote: N> All it is ridiculous, because a trend for 10 years suggest otherwise: Linux share grows. Considering that its share not on a desktop grows even faster it is possible to draw an output on perspectives for 20 years. That is, you accused me of lie because do not agree with the forecast. ... N> And I eliminate, from what it to disappear? Because competing systems are, and their quality any more so bad as 10 years ago, applications gradually creep in web, MS makes bad decisions. N> that comes in exchange? And you wrote something else about ability to read... Here it is real, whom that is ill.> what premises? Are enumerated above> Though one fact you will result? Growth of an amount X. S>> you the good fellow, truth: getting into a mess strenuously pretend that today simply hot day. N> aha, aha. Got into a mess with the facts on hands. And you, probably, stand an ass up, here it and is pure. Well, with the reason on which you so were often thrown by a phrase about inability to read we like understood, suggest to start to clarify why you suddenly started talking about "to stand an ass up"?

21

Re: Windows absolutely all

22

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Serginio1, you wrote: S> Thus the amount of desktops increases. Whether increases?

23

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Cyberax, you wrote: Cs> So, even MS recognized that the Windows on what are not suitable. Cs> Also took at last Linux: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/ … gent-edge/ a C> Meanwhile only for IoT, but we know that to it will not be restricted. You give Windows Services for Linux! Only a kernel. We transited it at the time of DOS, a graphic jacket windows 3.xx launched not on MS-DOS command.com. So put a candle for the peace of gnome, kde, x11 and wayland

24

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Night Looking, you wrote: NANOSECOND> Hello, Serginio1, you wrote: S>> Thus the amount of desktops increases. Whether the NANOSECOND> Increases? http://ru.pcmag.com/desktop-reviews/279 … padat-uzhe http://www.tadviser.ru/index.php/:_ (_) Sales decrease, but for example at my place 3 computers. Table, the Notebook and a media player. Table and to a notebook 6 years there are more. Work and is do not ask and thus fulfill everything that from them it is required. Simply service life increases. Earlier productivity grew considerably from year to year

25

Re: Windows absolutely all

Hello, Vedmed, you wrote: By the way yes, it will be amusing, if the MSEC of years through 5 lets out a graphic jacket for . Lindows?