1

Topic: Struggle against the law of Stardzhona

On one ""   I saw a post with approximately such text: Watching TV or the Internet, you swallow of slops. When you watch TV, you cannot switch from slops. When you look the Internet, you can switch to something another; but also slops on the Internet come across much more fetid. It seems to me, such problem of a choice arises always when there is a competition between the free creativity and  the large organizations. Here still examples or analogies: - If to buy products in the market, instead of in a supermarket, there and the prices more low, and can get separate very qualitative products, but also easily run into swindlers and beggars; - In the USSR on television there was very strict censorship. It fulfilled also a role of "moral censorship": anything dirty-beskulturnogo on the TV set did not show. When the USSR came to an end, on television became more than interesting transmissions, but also more than a various dirt; - When you select, whether to look films at cinemas or at home, you face a choice: at cinemas show sad modern , and it is possible to download with  really good films but when itself you select films for review at home, there are chances to run into very unpleasant shit. I.e. in case of a choice between the free creativity and a content filtered , in the first case there is more actual a problem of the law of Stardzhona. It as the choice - or is one porridge, or is a potato with fish - in the second case the meal is often more tasty, but can get and something rotten. By the last my example at me a question: whether correctly I understand, what at cinemas almost never show shocking-unpleasant films into which it is possible to run on the Internet? The exception - "is difficult to be god" Hermann. In this article I offered idea of the project which could overcome the law of Stardzhona, but for its implementation interest of a considerable quantity of people is necessary. What ways of struggle against the law of Stardzhona are still? I can offer such variants: 1) Should be any private algorithms of a choice of films, music and so forth For example, one participant wrote that he looks only such an anime: or the films which have been removed by Hajao of Miyazaki, or films for which music wrote ... [were forgotten by whom could not find - prompt the link to a post]. 2) overcomes the law of Stardzhona Vkontakte a little: if there to type a name of the executor, in the first 10 songs for certain there will be recognized hits of this executor. 3) at any forums it is possible to ask questions and to receive adequate answers (especially on it). 4) http://rsdn.org/forum/life/5416468.1 the Author: Fornications Pavel Data: 31.12.13 What else receptions can offer?

2

Re: Struggle against the law of Stardzhona

Hello, Khimik, you wrote: Always surprised - why people write memoirs? They are so assured of originality and  the life for others, what dare to immortalize it in a paper? Why people start to write any articles unexpectedly? You so are assured of depth of the thoughts and value of all of it for mankind, what simply do not presume to yourself that we lost this your valuable gift for people? I at all do not want to offend - really interesting - ? Well  you it write all? After all a heap of time you spend.

3

Re: Struggle against the law of Stardzhona

Hello, Khimik, you wrote: K> On one ""   I saw a post with approximately such text: K> K> Watching TV or the Internet, you swallow of slops. When you watch TV, you cannot switch from slops. When you look the Internet, you can switch to something another; but also slops on the Internet come across much more fetid. In a subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujBGFHpOhqg K> What else receptions can offer? Not to look slops.