1

Topic: [Inquiry] your relations with.Net Core

I try to understand it flied up or not. Inquiry: http://rsdn.org/poll/6538 the Author: Shmj Date: 16.05 21:13 Question: In what relations you consist with.Net Core

2

Re: [Inquiry] your relations with.Net Core

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> I Try to understand it flied up or not. Inquiry: http://rsdn.org/poll/6538 the Author: Shmj Date: 16.05 21:13 Question: In what relations you consist with.Net Core That there is a main project? If two and one on a bark and another is not present "the project cores"? And if at me the old main (truth yet did not understand that it) the project on.net fw, and new which I hope will be too the main and important, I do on Core? And I if I generally the contractor and at me am contracts on core and not core?

3

Re: [Inquiry] your relations with.Net Core

I try to persuade a manual to pass - it is impossible

4

Re: [Inquiry] your relations with.Net Core

S> I Try to understand it flied up or not. Inquiry: http://rsdn.org/poll/6538 the Author: Shmj Date: 16.05 21:13 Question: In what relations you consist with.Net Core there are no points in inquiry. In one project can be and Core, and not Core, it not mutually exclusive things. At desire, it is possible to use almost in any project: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qc2WFaMfdp8 it seems To me, a main point - what for it in your specific case is necessary. It is very convenient, if it is necessary to use one library on different platforms. But can in this case is better not.Net Core, and.Net Standard

5

Re: [Inquiry] your relations with.Net Core

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Inquiry: http://rsdn.org/poll/6538 the Author: Shmj Date: 16.05 21:13 Question: In what relations you consist with.Net Core And what such.Net classic? Did not hear such term. If it what I think I (exaggerate) why not simply "old".net? The last point was not pleasant. Inquiry about core, it is logical that the last point should be too about core. If core do not use, should be all the same, whether use any.net generally.

6

Re: [Inquiry] your relations with.Net Core

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> I Try to understand it flied up or not. I do not use and do not gather.

7

Re: [Inquiry] your relations with.Net Core

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> I Try to understand it flied up or not. Inquiry: http://rsdn.org/poll/6538 the Author: Shmj Date: 16.05 21:13 Question: In what relations you consist with.Net Core To me it is pleasant that became possible, working in a customary coding environment of a Visual Studio and using for a long time the written code, to write programs and to launch them on any cheap server of type Raspbian/RaspberryPI, and then probably to transfer on something more serious. Whether it flied up - well Microsoft office rich and it can support any project long enough, and now also opened - so, the project can be supported afloat community and without Microsoft. Whether write in the Silicon valley on.NET Core - hardly, there are carried away more  and browsers.

8

Re: [Inquiry] your relations with.Net Core

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> I Try to understand it flied up or not. Well as, you already understood, what Core in run? It is clear to any analyst without rising at all from a sofa. The bark came too late - when already under "normal there are no" people wrote for years, with all Windows-hukami, etc. (about pinvoke heard?) and now what sense in this "multiplatform revolution"? For whom to me to write to same Linupsah? 12 years ago - there is nobody was and it is now equal the same situation. And still the important: MS fell. .  on most . Quality of the code and products became below a plinth. Now ANY product that they roll out, it is necessary to accept with double scepticism and all-round testing. Consider, it is whole  in the Bark coffin. Therefore somehow even ridiculously to hear that someone there writes the "multiplatform" spillikins - with compromises, bugs, without half of classes, etc. Ah, yes - and without UI too. (Kzamariny? Seriously??) Windows.NET - though and  "virtual machine" implementation, but on . To a measure it at all removed from "programming under " all sufferings and to stupidity - began to write easily, on the order is easier. , it also we appreciate! Really having 100 % of clients under , to someone itches in ***  to throw out money on "we ours, we new Barks construct"?? It is business, he does not spring on technologies, and gains money - while there is no direct substantiation in a type ., the Bark remains "the unloved son" offices of uncle Bill. Already Nadoelly, certainly.

9

Re: [Inquiry] your relations with.Net Core

Hello, Vladek, you wrote: V> it is pleasant To me that became possible...  delight - one, business - another. And something of Barks somehow  about "business by a substantiation" for the implementation. Perhaps at you they are? V>... To write programs and to launch them on any cheap server of type Raspbian/RaspberryPI, and then probably to transfer on something more serious. , what strong announcement! And you can give an example the product written by you, which now "on any cheap Raspbian"? And that it to "be pleasant" - all can shout from bushes, it would be desirable was specific to see - whether there is something except shouts. Ah, yes - also tell, what at you "more serious" after RaspberryPI? Whether V> it Flied up - well Microsoft office rich and any project can support long enough Not longer patience of investors. The MSEC gains money, instead of supplies boys every year with "vau-platforms". Besides, times now oh what uneasy! - Even "rich" offices cannot throw out money for a wind - differently to "tops" does not suffice on ! So a question  "Barks" under the big question. And all it against "Win mobile" which as though too should be supported and make profit, and here ! On a place of investors I strongly would reflect on the competence of Nadoelly and the further destiny of the giant. V>... And now it also opened - so, the project can be supported afloat community Well here Linux - too "afloat" (as IT in an ice-hole), only to me from this support becomes easier not, the code ! Over a product should work as the pro. Over "" - can and . Whether V> Write in the Silicon valley on.NET Core - hardly, there are carried away more  and browsers. I will not confirm about JS, but here the Bark precisely not in a trend." On to try "someone and creates visibility of interest, but having Win.NET to spring in the next hoop of a microsoftware... - I respect myself enough to ignore this senseless . Today, in 21 century, it is necessary to understand one: the world   did not leave anywhere, simply mobile market became wider! All as to people it is necessary local ," that faster "," beautiful  ", etc. In other words,"  "- it is simple . For  at first it is necessary to HAVE THESE PLATFORMS! And what you can offer? Linux? To hens on laughter. ? It" a transcendental object "ALREADY with the ecosystem and products". And considering their policy, they and remain in a bum of the industry with the of 3 %.  is our all. Voluntary  to itself life "" for the sake of pair  from Linupsa? Excuse,  it is not necessary. Here such at us "relations with the Bark"

10

Re: [Inquiry] your relations with.Net Core

S> I Try to understand it flied up or not. Inquiry: http://rsdn.org/poll/6538 the Author: Shmj Date: 16.05 21:13 Question: In what relations you consist with.Net Core Students already try in diplomas

11

Re: [Inquiry] your relations with.Net Core

Hello, Kolesiki, you wrote: K> Linux? To hens on laughter. ? It is "transcendental object" ALREADY with the ecosystem and products ". And considering their policy, they and remain in a bum of the industry with the of 3 %.  is our all. Voluntary  to itself life""for the sake of pair  from Linupsa? Excuse,  it is not necessary.Net Core not for  applications and for Web and a server software. And on servers of statistican such: Linux 35.9 % FreeBSD of 0.95 % Unknown of 30.9 % of Microsoft Windows of 32.3 % On other data: Linux 96.6 % FreeBSD of 1.7 % of Microsoft Windows of 1.7 % https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_sha … e_Internet you think, whether much you know sites/services,  would use Windows as server OS? Well, except specialized unless I recall OK, PayPal, WebMoney. And so not especially... Facebook, vk, ebay, google - all on Linux.

12

Re: [Inquiry] your relations with.Net Core

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> I Try to understand it flied up or not. Inquiry: http://rsdn.org/poll/6538 the Author: Shmj Date: 16.05 21:13 Question: In what relations you would consist with.Net Core You left possibility the point to add. My relation such. Instead of at once developing the open and transferable system they played in  and lost. Now try to overtake for the missed. But devices left for a long time under  and different obzhektiv-si. The MSEC to hurry, as the further in wood, the from Kzamarina will be  more and more people in view of wretchedness of Mono and Kzamarin. . It would Seem build in this Barks in Kzamarin and correct bugs in , but is not present. On a desktop and in a web of barks can and drives, but it is not especially necessary. There is one niche - a web servers  Linuxes. Here there it will be precisely claimed. But there and without  the sea of decisions is. Meanwhile the MSEC stupidly merges to Java and Eplu. As they say, to the big ship - 7 foots over .

13

Re: [Inquiry] your relations with.Net Core

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> On a desktop and in a web of barks can and drives, but it is not especially necessary. There is one niche - a web servers  Linuxes. Here there it will be precisely claimed. But there and without  the sea of decisions is. VD> meanwhile the MSEC stupidly merges to Java and Eplu. VD> As they say, to the big ship - 7 foots over . On clouds to perfectly itself are claimed, and the MSEC just both earns on clouds and is put in them.  does not give so much, but they and in it are put. The same Blaser on Mono in webAssembly