1

Topic: Qt Creator - as it correctly to prepare?

Hello! Brought me in Qt, and I decided to work in the native environment for it - in Qt Creator'. At project creation qbs, as the most progressive (on responses the project format has been selected from the Internet). The question in that is as there to be debugged? Local stack variables does not show practically never. If to select a variable, and to drag in a window with a stack - adds watch and like would show. But if to take a step on F10 or F11 all becomes gray and it is not updated. Helps  with a window watch - seconds through 5-10 there are actual meanings. Thus occasionally there are also stack variables. On any a clique - though , though  - columns that are narrowed down to a minimum, extend normally to show all values. At pointer adding in watch - value in which specifies the pointer is shown. Thanks but if I it wanted - I would add the pointer with dereferencing. As a result, I and did not find a method to look at value of the pointer. The blessing that code which I now debug, uses pointers on the buffer which, about happiness, I can view entirely, and comparing values from the buffer and what is shown under the pointer, I can though somehow to understand, where specifies my pointer And it is the modern development environment? Which also extol?  System - Win7, Qt - like last, one week ago delivered with all applied - like Qt 5.10  Ugly Keil which from the middle 90 did not change years at all, and only recently started to support at compiler level (but not the environments) a C ++ 11 and that in times is more convenient

2

Re: Qt Creator - as it correctly to prepare?

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> Hello! M> brought me in Qt, and I decided to work in the native environment for it - in Qt Creator'. At project creation qbs, as the most progressive (on responses the project format has been selected from the Internet). M> the Question in that is as there to be debugged? For the answer to this question it is necessary to know not what system of the assembly you use, and what compiler/debugger. M> local stack variables does not show practically never. I suspect, you try to debug release the version. Or collected debug with optimization. I do not know as it probably, not  on qbs. The switch current build in the lower left part of the screen, over the button run. M> If to select a variable and to drag in a window with a stack - adds watch and like would show. But if to take a step on F10 or F11 all becomes gray and it is not updated. Helps  with a window watch - seconds through 5-10 there are actual meanings. Thus occasionally there are also stack variables. On any a clique - though , though  - columns that are narrowed down to a minimum, extend normally to show all values. M> at pointer adding in watch - value in which specifies the pointer is shown. Thanks but if I it wanted - I would add the pointer with dereferencing. As a result, I and did not find a method to look at value of the pointer. The blessing that code which I now debug, uses pointers on the buffer which, about happiness, I can view entirely, and comparing values from the buffer and that is shown under the pointer, I can though somehow to understand, where specifies my pointer of the Shortcut menu in a window watch: to remove a tick from point "Dereference pointers automaticaly" (the fourth from below). Its many what for put, then swear... M> Also it is the modern development environment? Which also extol? M>  System - Win7, Qt - like last, one week ago delivered with all applied - like Qt 5.10 M>  Ugly Keil which from the middle 90 did not change years at all, and only recently started to support at compiler level (but not the environments) a C ++ 11 and that in times Tell better what compiler and a debugger more conveniently... The Menu: [Options] / [Tools] / [Buiulkd and Run] / [Kits] to Select from the list kit which is designated by an addition (default). In the lower part of a window used compilers and debuggers will be specified.

3

Re: Qt Creator - as it correctly to prepare?

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> in the native environment for it - in Qt Creator'. Yes well on figs. VS2017 perfectly approaches for operation with Qt. Here and Qt Visual Studios Tools to 2.2.1 updated recently. Bugs , it is possible to work normally. As, at creation of new Qt-projects now parcers moc, qrc and ui do not generate a heap of files in Generated files, and  somewhere in themselves (or that type). I.e. now became less garbage in a project tree. M>  System - Win7, Qt - like last, one week ago delivered with all applied - like Qt 5.10 Especially it makes sense to use VS. The only thing for what I am insolent Qt Creator, this spelling and debugging QML, which support in Studio while any.

4

Re: Qt Creator - as it correctly to prepare?

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> Hello! M> brought me in Qt, and I decided to work in the native environment for it - in Qt Creator'. At project creation qbs, as the most progressive (on responses the project format has been selected from the Internet). I use a normal (classical) format *.pro a file by operation with Qt Creator. Modern Qt 5.10.1 - perfectly support it. About responses on the Internet - IMHO it is not necessary to run ahead of a steam locomotive. M> the question in that is as there to be debugged? Personally to me - customary to be debugged in   studios. About switching: In left  to a corner of primary window Qt Creator (on the vertical panel) there is a choice of modes: Release/Debug. What at you it is selected from options of the assembly and project start? We look - so: Into the menu - we come Tools/Options In the revealed window - to select point "Build and Run" (a bookmark "Kits"); From section "Auto-detected" - to select  mice a line italicized (it is a choice by default) - after that - we look that at us it is selected. P.S. Yes, after windows means and the same  studios, Qt Creator  it is not customary. Nevertheless, to create new Qt the project, to edit graphic windows and . - it is convenient in it! All remaining - IMHO it is convenient to do in studio (we put QtVsAddin - and forward) - here the list of these add-inov: https://download.qt.io/development_releases/vsaddin

5

Re: Qt Creator - as it correctly to prepare?

Hello, XOOIOOX, you wrote: XOO> Especially it makes sense to use VS. The only thing for what I am insolent Qt Creator, this spelling and debugging QML, which support in Studio while any. It is convenient to +100500 me in Qt Creator to create new Qt the project and to edit graphic forms (). Sometimes also happens conveniently to edit the application main menu. Though, it is possible to do the last two moments and in Qt Designer. New Qt the project - also can be created in studio. To simply me more customary for this purpose to pull  All remaining (editing, the assembly, debugging) - I do in MSVC But it is more matter of taste, instead of a principle. In essence - it it is possible to do all in the same Qt Creator. At the same time, it (in Windows) it is possible to do all completely in studio. If we do all in studio at editing of graphic forms, automatic it is caused Qt Designer.

6

Re: Qt Creator - as it correctly to prepare?

Hello, XOOIOOX, you wrote: XOO>... The Only thing for what I am insolent Qt Creator, this spelling and debugging QML, which support in Studio while any. Heard that in the paid version there are any tools for studio (just for QML) but which they do not give even on . Someone can in course?

7

Re: Qt Creator - as it correctly to prepare?

Hello, SaZ, you wrote: SaZ> any tools for studio (just for QML) but which they do not give even on . Never about the such heard. It would be interesting to learn. At least a title of this piece.

8

Re: Qt Creator - as it correctly to prepare?

Hello, XOOIOOX, you wrote: XOO> Never about the such heard. It would be interesting to learn. At least a title of this piece. I doubt. Here it is written that  are accessible only under GPL. And that is not absolutely clear smile. Actually I heard on one  (in 2014) from  that they plan to saw high-grade support QML in a Visual Studio, but their management strongly doubts that it will be claimed.

9

Re: Qt Creator - as it correctly to prepare?

Hello, SaZ, you wrote: SaZ> Actually I heard on one  (in 2014) from  that they plan to saw high-grade support QML in a Visual Studio So as now I remember that it (or about that) in  3rd versions  was: https://youtu.be/mq5OabVPrI8? t=14m34s

10

Re: Qt Creator - as it correctly to prepare?

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> Hello! In an oven this Creator. QT easily gets on with studio.

11

Re: Qt Creator - as it correctly to prepare?

Hello, SaZ, you wrote: XOO>>... The Only thing for what I am insolent Qt Creator, this spelling and debugging QML, which support in Studio while any. SaZ> heard that in the paid version there are any tools for studio (just for QML) but which they do not give even on . Someone can in course? Earlier precisely were, for a long time used  for QWidgets in studio, looked  and understood that in Qt Designer more conveniently if they for QML make support same as before was for QWidget it is necessary to nobody, it is better let in QT Creator-e support, and that at me in their designer any qml a file not  will be better.

12

Re: Qt Creator - as it correctly to prepare?

Hello, AlexGin, you wrote: AG> I use a normal (classical) format *.pro a file by operation with Qt Creator. You use not "file format", and assembly means qmake. Files of projects for qmake normally have ".pro extension. qmake it is made only that on its background cmake looked not absolutely badly. qbs in comparison with both is space. AG> modern Qt 5.10.1 - perfectly support it. AG> about responses on the Internet - IMHO it is not necessary to run ahead of a steam locomotive. Years 5 in  I use. Current version 1.11, actively is supported and develops most Qt.

13

Re: Qt Creator - as it correctly to prepare?

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> Brought me in Qt, and I decided to work in the native environment for it - in Qt Creator'. At project creation qbs, as the most progressive (on responses the project format has been selected from the Internet). Indeed. System of assembly QBS the Author: Skorodum Date: 05.11.14 Followers cmake are truth very much touches, but we forgive them M> the Question in that is as there to be debugged? Local stack variables does not show practically never. If to select a variable, and to drag in a window with a stack - adds watch and like would show. But if to take a step on F10 or F11 all becomes gray and it is not updated. Helps  with a window watch - seconds through 5-10 there are actual meanings. Thus occasionally there are also stack variables. On any a clique - though , though  - columns that are narrowed down to a minimum, extend normally to show all values. To you already answered that  a plausible reason -  the assembly, fault IDE here is not present. "Ctrl + t" M> Also it is the modern development environment? Which also extol? Boris, you is not right (Features Qt Creator the Author: Skorodum Date: 02.11.15 Most-most IDE the Author: Skorodum Date: 29.05.17 QtCreator + "Flat dark" them + "Source Code Pro" font the Author: Skorodum Date: 26.02 14:57

14

Re: Qt Creator - as it correctly to prepare?

Hello, gka, you wrote: gka> In an oven this Creator. gka> QT easily gets on with studio. In what average and big projects are fast compiled? On the average project (80 files) in Qt Creator I wait for 30-60 seconds while it will be compiled and will be launched. Whether it is necessary to try in studio?

15

Re: Qt Creator - as it correctly to prepare?

Hello, Submitter, you wrote: S> In what average and big projects are fast compiled? On the average project (80 files) in Qt Creator I wait for 30-60 seconds while it will be compiled and will be launched. Whether it is necessary to try in studio? And at what here IDE? On 99 % put here in the compiler and assembly system.

16

Re: Qt Creator - as it correctly to prepare?

Hello, Skorodum, you wrote: S> Hello, AlexGin, you wrote: AG>> I use normal (classical) a format *.pro a file by operation with Qt Creator. S> you use not "file format", and assembly means qmake. +100500 Yes, QMake as I understand, this main means of the assembly for Qt . S> Files of projects for qmake normally have ".pro extension. S> qmake it is made only that on its background cmake looked not absolutely badly. S> qbs in comparison with both is space. This new means of the assembly - is possible, it is necessary also to me to try it! S> years 5 in  I use. Current version 1.11, actively is supported and develops most Qt. That is, QBS it is positioned as standard bild-system for Qt-shnyh projects. I correctly understood? If I open projects on Qt through studio, with QBS how to be?

17

Re: Qt Creator - as it correctly to prepare?

Hello, AlexGin, you wrote: AG> As I understand, this main means of the assembly for Qt . At whom as It is possible also purely studio projects, both cmake, and qmake and qbs etc. AG> That is, QBS it is positioned as standard bild-system for Qt-shnyh projects. I correctly understood? While the main system in most Qt still qmake, but talks about passage on qbs go. AG> if I open projects on Qt through studio, with QBS how to be? If IDE it is possible to specify a command in the assembly it is possible qbs to use as the utility  lines. Still qbs is able  files of projects for Studio.

18

Re: Qt Creator - as it correctly to prepare?

Hello, Marty, you wrote: 1. If you under Windows for debugging is still additional  extensions for . Precisely I will not recall, . That they should be delivered as usual with a tambourine to dance, but then strongly helped. 2. On mine all the same QBS still  and . 3. All the same studio yet such comfortable for operation with Qt.