1

Topic: for determination of leak storage in MinGW

From the normal I know only Valgrind, but it only under . Who than uses?

2

Re: for determination of leak storage in MinGW

V> From the normal I know only Valgrind, but it only under . Who than uses? It is irrelevant

3

Re: for determination of leak storage in MinGW

Hello, Vicul, you wrote: V>> From the normal I know only Valgrind, but it only under . Who than uses? V> it is irrelevant found leak or ? If  - tell to us, whether that, and that judging by answers - nobody in course, and is curious.

4

Re: for determination of leak storage in MinGW

Hello, aik, you wrote: aik> found leak or ? If  - tell to us, whether that, and that judging by answers - nobody in course, and is curious. Judging by a subject on , here it advised - https://github.com/dynamorio/drmemory

5

Re: for determination of leak storage in MinGW

https://sourceforge.net/projects/diagnostic/ did not meet all remaining  better,  it is hung up,  not to debug generally

6

Re: for determination of leak storage in MinGW

aik> found leak or ? If  - tell to us, whether that, and that judging by answers - nobody in course, and is curious. At random localized a problem section, there it and .

7

Re: for determination of leak storage in MinGW

Hello, Vicul, you wrote: V> From the normal I know only Valgrind, but it only under . Who than uses? Dr. Memory, as a variant. Analog . There are superficial libraries (not fastened on page addressing).

8

Re: for determination of leak storage in MinGW

Hello, reversecode, you wrote: R> https://sourceforge.net/projects/diagnostic/ R> did not meet R> all remaining  better,  it is hung up,  not to debug generally And why activity of development ended in 2016?

9

Re: for determination of leak storage in MinGW

PPA> And why activity of development ended in 2016? Whence I know? Buttons +  + count of exports of functions of operation with storage = what there still to develop?