26

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

VD> And where groans on the Internet about it? Or I one such courageous? So to you resulted these groans at the very beginning of yours , you wrote that it is liberal  read

27

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

28

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

Hello, _ilya _, you wrote: __> Point) it unless not your case? __>) turn should be carried out so that at departure from intersection of travelers of parts the vehicle did not appear on the oncoming traffic side (point 8.6 of traffic regulations). Ilya, you a little bothered. I after all wrote that violation of item 8.6 from me removed. And time explained to 10 you why I did not break it. But you all on figs. You as that inspector. Invented to itself something and you rush with it.

29

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

Hello, Unforgiver, you wrote: U> But hardly more low - about aggravating circumstances. I did not understand, at you such violation already was? Same as at you - penalties from cameras for excess on 20 + km. U> at me in the aggravating "numerous penalties" (already whole 3 - 2 for a speed +20-40 on a route and 1 for not fastened children) appear. At me their pieces 10. U> Also it is possible to write safely in the complaint to the inspector - that he does not know traffic regulations and deliberately incorrectly treats violation. Yes. In this plan already offset. And not only the inspector, but also an eagle from analysis group. But it would be desirable also justice in respect of change 12.15 4 on 12.16 2.

30

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

Hello, snautSH, you wrote: SH> so to you resulted these groans at the very beginning of yours , you wrote that it is liberal  read I something any more I do not remember. But if such cases would be much groans would be audible everywhere.

31

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> Same as at you - penalties from cameras for excess on 20 + km. VD> at me their pieces 10. It is necessary to be ashamed, instead of to smile. Never the thought visited, what high-speed restrictions exist not simply so? I here am perfect against deprivation of the rights for your violation of a marking and traffic signs since it did not represent any danger to anybody. But I categorically for deprivation of the rights at excess of speed on 20 + % from a limit or for repeated exceedings of speed. And for penalties anchored to the income. Then ten thousand a year on roads will not perish.

32

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

Hello, LaPerouse, you wrote: LP> Hello, VladD2, you wrote: F>>> (the middle 3 pages - "that passed arguments under 90 degrees and on  did not get are refuted..."). VD>> Here the matter is that are not especially refuted. There is only a statement of the inspector. I not so understand, why it should be the law. LP> it the witness. Not the claimant and not the responder, unlike you. Therefore its words take into consideration, and you - are not present. It the representative of the claimant. And I too had a witness (not the relative), and its words too did not take into consideration.

33

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> Hello, LaPerouse, you wrote: LP>> It the witness. Not the claimant and not the responder, unlike you. Therefore its words take into consideration, and you - are not present. VD> Generally it an accuser. And why at the explicit facts of concealment of proofs the judge continues to trust it is a big question. Because so it is necessary. Not you the first, not you last. Condemned and forgot. And tomorrow it to Basilio's cat and a fox of Alise following to judge.

34

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

VD> I any more do not remember something. But if such cases would be much groans would be audible everywhere. So of them it is full, in Google type. Well and logically, I do not trust that is exceptional bad GAI officer and simultaneously with it is exceptional bad judge got to you

35

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

VD> At me their pieces 10.  , at me for 2 years 1 penalty for  on 11 km and run 30000 for these of year from them of 60 % city traffic the same dangerous driving, besides now all navigators have instructions of the allowed speed, what for so it is dangerous to go?

36

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

Hello, snautSH, you wrote: VD>> At me their pieces 10. SH>  , at me for 2 years 1 penalty for  on 11 km and run 30000 for these of year from them of 60 % city traffic SH> the same dangerous driving, besides now all navigators have instructions of the allowed speed, what for so it is dangerous to go? You the German, you not to understand

37

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

LP> You the German, you not to understand I not the German, but I do not understand what for to break, really pair  minutes stand the raised risk

38

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> the Probability very much even is great. Here literally 30th stopped me. I often go at night. And brake often enough at night. When in Moscow, I am returned almost always for a midnight. Never braked, for some years. VD> besides they have all data. I remember when at me came to an end  started to hunt for me simply. You really think, what each inspector holds thousand hundred numbers of cars at which the insurance comes to an end in a head? I if that without the insurance go two years. Braked few times, and that not in Moscow.

39

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> Ilya, you a little bothered. I after all wrote that violation of item 8.6 from me removed. Unduly made 8.6... I.e. nevertheless generalized as rules broke earlier and as that turn on the left here it is not authorized and cannot be. Many variants of interpretation of rules as you went on a lawlessness, ignoring everything if to consider all manoeuvre as one 8.6 will be - it appeared not as should, at the allowed turn only to the right, should on 180 degrees on another be turned after departure from a crossroads. As a matter of fact, should turn in an extreme right band. If it did not make and perpendicularly intersected already violation, further intersection continuous the second violation. But the car already was before in abnormal position - to perpendicularly bands where so it is forbidden to go not that part of a crossroads where there is an intersection, explicit violation of layout of a car. Here a question how to judge some violations successively, which on one on deprivation of the rights do not pull, but on set there is a tin. By initial and finite position it is explicit 8.6 On manoeuvres and intersection continuous - 9.2. The judge generally 1.3 installed but how to punish for violation 1.3 (and it explicit and you do not dispute it) is not registered... I nevertheless on a place of the judge would ask - that for manoeuvre made, if turn to the right, evolution (all is driving under 90 degrees) and further a turn, 9.2. If turn fulfilled, 8.6 as only turn to the right here is resolved and it to appear in an opposite direction should not after departure from intersection of travelers of parts. The rights will be natural for selecting anyway correct - the logic of safe driving, and on a root is broken. It in any way the children's penalty in 1,5  when perpendicularly to bands go in not supposed place breaking and signs and ignoring a marking.

40

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

Hello, Skorodum, you wrote: S> I here am perfect against deprivation of the rights for your violation of a marking and traffic signs since it did not represent any danger to anybody. Horror... Driving across road to 6 bands including tram where it is forbidden it not  violation? It as Vlad - is strictly perpendicular through all bands: https://youtu.be/TULsqUpiOTs

41

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

Hello, snautSH, you wrote: VD>> At me their pieces 10. SH>  , at me for 2 years 1 penalty for  on 11 km and run 30000 for these of year from them of 60 % city traffic SH> the same dangerous driving, besides now all navigators have instructions of the allowed speed, what for so it is dangerous to go? At us cameras are installed to punish in the planned order. And with this operation they quite consult. I on Leningradke without breaking (in my opinion) led photosession regularly. And my spouse also. On the third or fourth time I found it. After turn there is a sign a city, and right after it the camera. Very important in time . Not the camera - and a gold foul place. And my family became the malicious infringer. So you there on foreign land a fig do not understand cameras.

42

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

Hello, Skorodum, you wrote: S> But I categorically for deprivation of the rights at excess of speed on 20 + % from a limit or for repeated exceedings of speed. S> and for penalties anchored to the income. Then ten thousand a year on roads will not perish. Here it as? If the high-speed mode would be installed reasonably can and it would be possible to adhere to such rules, and we on 7 strip  can have a restriction 60. Well, and disproportion of punishment hardly pushes people to observance of laws. All the same after all +160 to go or or +20. What then decencies to observe?

43

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

Hello, snautSH, you wrote: SH> so of them it is full, in Google type. You will not check, many times typed. But here the same case as at me (when it is stupid for turn bend as for driving on ) I did not find any. I can is bad I search? Give the reference, . Of them it is full. SH> well and logically, I do not trust that is exceptional bad GAI officer and simultaneously with it is exceptional bad judge Well got to you, I not go the first year by road. Came across to me different. But nevertheless here and so in impudent itself(himself) nobody conducted.

44

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

Hello, snautSH, you wrote: SH>  , at me for 2 years 1 penalty for  on 11 km and run 30000 for these of year from them of 60 % city traffic Would be at us  with zero restriction, at me too would be a little. You to Moscow come and then we look. Here cameras continually. SH> the same dangerous driving, besides now all navigators have instructions of the allowed speed, what for so it is dangerous to go? About danger you invented. At me any failure for 10 years. Quickly does not mean dangerously. Speed, and calculation and a distance is important not.

45

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

Hello, LaPerouse, you wrote: LP> When in Moscow, I am returned almost always for a midnight. Never braked, for some years. Means rarely . I can recommend here to do a bit of traveling a week on the Yaroslavl highway. They stand on entrance to a city every night. Brake not each time, but for a month precisely once stop. And on figs you go with  or from area. They superimpose both ways. I speak, here couple of days ago . Before month went by them. But I went any more after an hour, is faster nearby 4. Are on Friday night braked literally all. This lush time. The people go from taverns. LP> you really think, what each inspector holds thousand hundred numbers of cars at which the insurance comes to an end in a head? I if that without the insurance go two years. Braked few times, and that not in Moscow. What for it to hold? At them now computers are. They it directly in  deduce the information.

46

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> After all small not sickly itself substituted, when started to say lies under the oath. Allow to file the judge my video with its way and it could already most be condemned for lie under the oath. It there it is accurate . Small nuance but if I now not , in the Russian Federation was not present concept "the oath in court". It is an Americanism There is a piece of paper with the signature under clarification of responsibility for false witness.

47

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> Hello, Unforgiver, you wrote: U>> But hardly more low - about aggravating circumstances. I did not understand, at you such violation already was? VD> same as at you - penalties from cameras for excess on 20 + km. U>> at me in the aggravating "numerous penalties" (already whole 3 - 2 for a speed +20-40 on a route and 1 for not fastened children) appear. VD> At me their pieces 10. At me 254 for 2 years

48

Re: The decision of the world judge on NPA

Hello, sharpcoder, you wrote: S> At me 254 for 2 years  Podi of 99,99 % of the camera?