Hello, eskimo82, you wrote: E> In the first, such concept as "processors for " does not exist. You invented him some posts above. Moreover and the demagogue. E> in the second, this product is positioned by the vendor as SoC (system on chip), instead of as the microprocessor and not as the microcontroller. E> Sootvetsvenno and comparing should is led with the modern analogs. E> in , modern SoC for a long time for a long time already 64 bit, with several kernels, with GPU, VFP, NEON and other coprocessors, and on the same . So any microcontroller falls under concept SoC, even 8-bit - there both the processor, and storage, including non-volatile, and various additional units almost. All that is necessary for embedded system. Simply are inclined to produce the treatment of the term as it is unique true, ostensibly SoC should be the computer, and anything else. E> In the fourth, MIPS as the architecture became outdated yet this decade, and slightly earlier. Iksperdnoe judgement?