Hello, vladislav_somov, you wrote: _> Vlad, I fairly do not understand on what you hoped and continue to hope. _> what you know laws is better, the procedural right and other knowledge is better than the good lawyer? Well, I not is worse 90 % of these lawyers can study demanded laws for a specific case. With logic at me all APPRX. Laws to read me too learned. Knowledge we receive on a play course. Well, and it is banal interesting and not so . The good lawyer costs much, and from normal will be more harm. _> all goes to that you will become the pedestrian, and you persistently want to make all. We still look at it. _> find the good lawyer, go on consultation, it gives all deal to you. And that it actually gives that what I cannot take? That I did not break that 8.6 already installed court the Author: VladD2 Date: 31.05 18:53. The judge speaking about it words during meetings changed 8.6 on 1.3. About such course I learned still when talked to the chief of group of analysis. 1.3 cannot conduct to at all selection of the rights as it would not contain the description on which I it appeared on . It is pure arbitrariness to judge. I already ask this question here the third time. You can can answer it? Than the lawyer in case of an arbitrariness of the judge helps? _> even if it all makes in the same way as you would make also, you all the same to benefit have less than chances. Why? _> once there was at me an epopee in court (not traffic regulations, another) where I was ready to appear, on what to me the lawyer told that if the choice will not be, I will appear, of course, but better it in every possible way to avoid. My question why answered that judges do not love, when at court there are nonprofessional lawyers. A pier, much easier, when in court generally only representatives of the sides. Well, here it as. Formally I the professional lawyer, as formation at me legal. Here experts - 0. Unless the logic is trained for 20 years of programming. Here I resulted a judgement and the outputs. You can look. As to consultation of the strong lawyers I am possible to it and I will resort. But in court it would be desirable to be most, instead of to be the observer. I nevertheless hope that in our society it is possible to achieve the decision.