101

Re: The second meeting of court on NPA

I sympathize. I represent as unpleasantly to face such injustice and a dirty trick.

102

Re: The second meeting of court on NPA

Hello, Unforgiver, you wrote: U> Hello, wraithik, you wrote: W>> Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD>>> And that here so impudently to say lies under the oath before it it is distinct hearing that at other side is that proof that it says lies is generally I even I can not understand. It either improbable nonsense or a faith in the impunity. W>> is not present, there in bulk mongrels. The nastiest that is no real mechanism of their punishment. U> here it is interesting to me. Their such there type, it is criterion of selection if you on character rubbish - that approach? Or they such become? All of us are not ideal, and we try to make within the limits of the morals all easier for ourselves. Look at morals of some at a forum "correctly Vlad punished, on spirit of the law". Increase it by serious impunity (how to deliver the cop a cancer I I know, but really to make it only having good acquaintances in Office of Public Prosecutor, FSB or court, differently it is very tiresome quest with the gloomy end). Here also we receive: The plan on sticks sits , at it, to work to it is lazy, it is already real  to look at all odd fellows on road (here I completely understand it), he understands that "there are no bases not to trust the inspector" and Vlad the bad person considers that, and it is necessary to punish it, and here also the plan. The beret also does operation. Formally - it even fulfilled it, it became more safe. The infringer any more will not be on road. It can be fulfilled even more abruptly - simply to shoot down, and it is less than corks, and to break any more will not be. But it already article, not . Very badly that at us such free treatment of laws. Here put at all in the cop, business in the system and legislature. U> the real mechanism of their punishment is But not lawful means, and through "familiar acquaintances". U> My friend too substituted - GAI officers removed at it number front (or someone at them made it, back was not) while it quitted the machine. And as soon as it returned and got under way from a place - accepted for driving without registration number. As waited. U> he called the friend (rather picturesque person). Further as they say from a song of words you will not throw out "Arrived with  on a post, my machine wanted to make out on the penalty-parking, on a post me handed over to any captain. We sit we wait, it makes out. I once again ring to Lyohe, to specify where I am.  sent there the assistant to the deputy, and that on this post tore out all GAI officers, took away my documents on the machine and threatened that if number do not deliver tomorrow to such address he addresses to there is nobody  and then them not so tear out, and from operation ". Number returned the same day. U> simply it is an example of "good corruption" and when such friends play for you. But it is easily possible to get to a situation when you on 100 % will be right, and then there will be necessary friends at the second participant, and all turns over upside down. As it works I know." Good corruption "is not present. It is necessary to recognize that the law does not work if worked the telephone right. When you watch commercials in an Internet with , absolutely not clearly, what horse-radish of these creatures in shape do not put. After all to put things in order elementarily. But at shopping center the divisional on the salary, well cannot tell it that protection is not right, it is a minus the award, to Turkey Crimea does not drive with a family.

103

Re: The second meeting of court on NPA

Hello, Sheridan, you wrote: S> Hello, wraithik, you wrote: W>> At a crossroads (intersection of travelers of parts if to be exact, but here this one and too) there is no COUNTER. S> one subtlety: where you saw crossroads with solid lines? Full. Moscow/Voroshilovsky Temernitsky/Voroshilovsky Without a marking too to show? W>> if the person goes on MTS band under a brick, of it to deprive of the rights or 1500? S> to Deprive. Time it here spat, and in other places spits on rules. The member is, means we sit down for rape? And at once for murder, both a robbery, and terrorism - it did not fulfill one law, means spits on all. Here the subject is, where the people unsubscribed that normally break. At the majority it: Speed (in reasonable limits) to be turned/be torn where it is impossible, but safely parking of the half-expert for MTS That that I did not note there overtakings through , driving on red, driving  is just gross infringements for which correctly deprive of the rights, for on an output as a rule serious traumas and corpses. At us on a route of 90 % of people breaks traffic regulations, who is rare 90 does not go. Of all to deprive? After all they broke.

104

Re: The second meeting of court on NPA

Hello, sharpcoder, you wrote: S> I Sympathize. I represent as unpleasantly to face such injustice and a dirty trick. A dirty trick that laws are registered inadequately. Justice in that that is treated act, and where at laws all is inadequately registered in cases, without a bribe you condemn to "legal and adequately violation". Couples I think that AI as at everything, at changeover of lawyers at us not that does not earn that, iron AI is simple burns down at calculation of contradictions in laws and at all  interpretations. It is necessary to rewrite adequately all laws, differently anything will not work - as the brightest  an example  with  where there is no mandatory usage  for talk... Verbally the law there is enough feature in  allowing without hands to talk, well and at driving there are no requirements to use this mode... It is possible to take stupidly the smart phone in a hand and .

105

Re: The second meeting of court on NPA

Hello, Denwer, you wrote: D> And all turned out as at everything, its our system simply moved and without noting. Only Vlad does not deny that broke rules, it ignored a sign turn only to the right, moved perpendicularly through a continuous separating band between counter flows. And further states that this violation for copeck... In Germany I think only for contest of that that it broke would direct on the specific test - https://pikabu.ru/story/quotidiotentest … av_1443959

106

Re: The second meeting of court on NPA

Hello, wraithik, you wrote: W> That for a manner me sense of the message. Here so it is accepted But yes, me carried away aside. W> if in KoAPe it will be registered that for +20 - 2 weeks on foot - will be a question to KoAPu. W> Now it turned out that should select the rights to two weeks, and it shot. +1.

107

Re: The second meeting of court on NPA

Hello, _ilya _, you wrote: __> Hello, sharpcoder, you wrote: S>> I Sympathize. I represent as unpleasantly to face such injustice and a dirty trick. __> a dirty trick that laws are registered inadequately. __> justice in that that act is treated, and where at laws all is inadequately registered in cases, without a bribe you condemn to "legal and adequately violation". There is here no adequacy and validity. Lie of the cop under the oath, removal of proofs and so forth

108

Re: The second meeting of court on NPA

Hello, wraithik, you wrote: W> Hello, Sheridan, you wrote: S>> Hello, wraithik, you wrote: W>>> At a crossroads (intersection of travelers of parts if to be exact, but here this one and too) there is no COUNTER. S>> one subtlety: where you saw crossroads with solid lines? W> it is full. W> Moscow/Voroshilovsky W> Temernitsky/Voroshilovsky W> Without a marking too to show? I got it. To you for traffic regulations to postpone. Most likely and on other rules too. You think not "how not to break", and "how to bypass" yet did not catch and "as " when caught. W>>> if the person goes on MTS band under a brick, of it to deprive of the rights or 1500? S>> to Deprive. Time it here spat, and in other places spits on rules. W> the member is, means we sit down for rape? And at once for murder, both a robbery, and terrorism - it did not fulfill one law, means spits on all. ,  to exaggerate on the full. Or the habit to press a foot gas in full affects, time the machine it is able? W> here the subject is, where the people unsubscribed that normally break. At the majority it: W> W> speed (in reasonable limits) W> to be turned/be torn where it is impossible, but it is safe W> parking W> the half-expert for MTS W> W> That that I did not note there overtakings through , driving on red, driving  is just gross infringements for which correctly deprive of the rights, for on an output as a rule serious traumas and corpses. At us on a route of 90 % of people breaks traffic regulations, who is rare 90 does not go. Of all to deprive? After all they broke. Yes, on the third time. The first time - a conventional penalty. The second time - on two orders above. The third time - deprivation  months. That is why that woodpeckers who consider itself more cleverly others got and that is possible for them more. And then that cork on a roadside, a parking on sidewalk.

109

Re: The second meeting of court on NPA

Hello, Sheridan, you wrote: S> Hello, wraithik, you wrote: W>> Hello, Sheridan, you wrote: S>>> Hello, wraithik, you wrote: W>>>> At a crossroads (intersection of travelers of parts if to be exact, but here this one and too) there is no COUNTER. S>>> one subtlety: where you saw crossroads with solid lines? W>> it is full. W>> Moscow/Voroshilovsky W>> Temernitsky/Voroshilovsky W>> Without a marking too to show? S> I understood. To you for traffic regulations to postpone. Most likely and on other rules too. You think not "how not to break", and "how to bypass" yet did not catch and "as " when caught. From a subject not . At us do not do dynamic crossroads, type when there is no corks go on the left, when machines full, only directly and to the right. Here in such cases when manoeuvre is safe if you break traffic regulations of nothing happens. It is safe. Rules are written with a store. You on a route are exceptional to 90 go? Simply - yes or not. Try not to spin. How many run for a year on the average? To consider traffic regulations with people doing not control sense by machine occupation silly, all the same as I to you will tell as Linux to adjust. W>>>> if the person goes on MTS band under a brick, of it to deprive of the rights or 1500? S>>> to Deprive. Time it here spat, and in other places spits on rules. W>> the member is, means we sit down for rape? And at once for murder, both a robbery, and terrorism - it did not fulfill one law, means spits on all. S> Doo,  to exaggerate on the full. Or the habit to press a foot gas in full affects, time the machine it is able? At you such habit is? At me is not present. You began the first. I only continued. W>> here the subject is, where the people unsubscribed that normally break. At the majority it: W>> W>> speed (in reasonable limits) W>> to be turned/be torn where it is impossible, but it is safe W>> parking W>> the half-expert for MTS W>> W>> That that I did not note there overtakings through , driving on red, driving  is just gross infringements for which correctly deprive of the rights, for on an output as a rule serious traumas and corpses. At us on a route of 90 % of people breaks traffic regulations, who is rare 90 does not go. Of all to deprive? After all they broke. S> yes, on the third time. S> the first time - a conventional penalty. The second time - on two orders above. The third time - deprivation  months. S> that is why that woodpeckers who consider itself more cleverly others got and that is possible for them more. And then that cork on a roadside, a parking on sidewalk. I will repeat, on a route you go 90? For a roadside it is necessary to tear up, for sidewalk too. They like as in the list also are not present. With a roadside generally  to deliver the camera and let cuts penalties.

110

Re: The second meeting of court on NPA