1

Topic: Blind Americans threaten

All greetings, addressed to me one American, the program tells the report on results of handling deduces small, I visually impaired, do not see . I with it  in enough  a positive key, told about , and I speak - there are no problems, give we in one of  versions we add possibility to increase fonts (I think give I will make a good deed to the person), and he such here answers me this: You apparently are located in a country other than the USA. The US Department of Justice has prosecuted companies for their failure to comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act "ADA" as it relates to computer software. If you sell ANY computer software in the USA (as your company does) it must be accessible to the visually impair (as I am). If not you can be sued by the disabled person and/or the US. Department of Justice. In the event that your software is not modified within seven (7) days from your receipt of this email, I will file a formal complaint with the US Department of Justice and consider filing my own lawsuit against your company! And somehow at once it became clear to me that the given blind man also * in general, at me two questions. The first as to experts in this business - how much to me generally is all dangerously for me (I in the Russian Federation, a hosting in from the USA, PPG, Payoneer). The second - as to programmers - is a question about standard Listview from.net 4.5.2. Any modifications, behind an exception double buffered. Why it cannot increase the text standard mechanisms Windows (there is any magnifier in my opinion in Windows), whether are required any  adjustments in application for this purpose? Or he does not want to use a magnifier and simply wants that its increased font, by the automatic machine was applied to Listview...

2

Re: Blind Americans threaten

D> the Second - as to programmers - is a question about standard Listview from.net 4.5.2. Any modifications, behind an exception double buffered. D> Why it cannot increase the text standard mechanisms Windows (there is any magnifier in my opinion in Windows), whether are required any  adjustments in application for this purpose? Or he does not want to use a magnifier and simply wants that its increased font, by the automatic machine was applied to Listview... And that there to do? Received LOGFONT from common dialog of a choice of a font, remembered it somewhere in adjustments, well and then CreateFontIndirect and ListView to send WM_SETFONT? Operations on half an hour on idea ...

3

Re: Blind Americans threaten

D> the Second - as to programmers - is a question about standard Listview from.net 4.5.2. Any modifications, behind an exception double buffered. In Windows in properties of the screen deliver scale of percent in 200-250. If the program is not expanded proportionally - it makes sense to repair, it also on high-dpi screens gets out, will not be exact worse, if corrects. Also probably support accessibility - everyones there screen , helping visually impaired is necessary to it. On idea if the program is constructed on standard  it is all should be from a box, but too it is necessary to check up.

4

Re: Blind Americans threaten

Hello, dmitry251, you wrote: D> in general, at me two questions. The first as to experts in this business - how much to me generally is all dangerously for me (I in the Russian Federation, a hosting in from the USA, PPG, Payoneer). Yes . Madwomen  everywhere, and states not an exception. You can in  the list it deliver, and  to make, if he to you paid something. And further most usability for blind, it it is useful to make this, but only not in that rate of which is demanded by this uncle, and in in what it is convenient you. It is impossible to satisfy this uncle - as soon as you will make to it listview, he demands dristview or still something and so will be indefinitely. The such sometimes come across.

5

Re: Blind Americans threaten

Hello, dmitry251, you wrote: D> in general, at me two questions. The first as to experts in this business - how much to me generally is all dangerously for me (I in the Russian Federation, a hosting in from the USA, PPG, Payoneer). At us when clients  come across and threaten with claims it in what does not result. The company physically in the USA. But I try to adhere to a rule - not to speak superfluous words and not to correspond with anybody positively. There is a question - here the answer. Are not ready if to answer - we evade the question, we drag out (we explain on the side and we return to you ).

6

Re: Blind Americans threaten

1. Money to return. 2. A key . 3. Not to hammer to itself in a head.

7

Re: Blind Americans threaten

Hello, dmitry251, you wrote: D> D> In the event that your software is not modified within seven (7) days from your receipt of this email, I will file a formal complaint with the US Department of Justice and consider filing my own lawsuit against your company! With such tone - at once  (on idea in yours EULA under this business there should be a point). Given the circumstances and as per our long-standing policy towards abusive and frivolous legal threats, we have no choice but to issue you a full refund, ask you to uninstall all copies of our products from all yours systems and drop you as our client. Best regards, Vasili Pupkin

8

Re: Blind Americans threaten

Hello, wantus, you wrote: W> With such tone - at once  (on idea in yours EULA under this business there should be a point). And how it in EULA should be reflected?

9

Re: Blind Americans threaten

Hello, dmitry251, you wrote: D> in general, at me two questions. The first as to experts in this business - how much to me generally is all dangerously for me (I in the Russian Federation, a hosting in from the USA, PPG, Payoneer). Dogs who most loudly bark, do not bite. Popular wisdom.

10

Re: Blind Americans threaten

Hello, Kernan, you wrote: K> Hello, wantus, you wrote: W>> With such tone - at once  (on idea in yours EULA under this business there should be a point). K> And how it in EULA should be reflected? It is better to make so: Refunds. The Author does not accept any returns nor make any refunds for the Software. You are responsible for verifying Software compatibility by installing and executing the trial/demo/free version before purchasing. Because for the adequate client always it is possible to make , despite of that that write to licenses. And sly fellows and legal trolls are swept aside at once, understanding that the freebie will not be. For clever men and legal trolls specially in all EULA, even in open-soursnom a software, write capital letters about the limited warranty and a failure from responsibility. And that in some countries did not bring an action, etc., it is possible to make so: Warranties. You represent and warrant that You are solely responsible for ensuring compliance with all applicable laws. Who is afraid of financial claims on the huge totals, something of type: IN EVENT WILL AUTHOR GRANT ANY LIABILITY FOR ANY CLAIM, WHETHER IN CONTRACT OR ANY OTHER FORM OF LIABILITY, IN EXCESS OF THE LICENSE FEE PAID BY YOU, IF ANY.... YOU HEREBY RELEASE THE AUTHOR FROM ANY AND ALL OBLIGATIONS, LIABILITIES AND CLAIMS IN EXCESS OF THIS LIMITATION. For possibility to restrict from those who breaks similar promises (and the rights to make  and ): Termination. The Author may terminate this License if You fail to comply with the terms of this License or any applicable related agreements with the Author. Generally, read the licenses made the American companies. There a lot of the soft is laid against everyones . I took once the license for Borland products for a basis, adding points, proceeding from realities  later.

11

Re: Blind Americans threaten

Well you is any agreement on product usage? Read that there it is written. If you there nothing , and took a typical bed-sheet from the Internet there should be written that the product is delivered as is, and it uses it at own risk, and you for what do not answer. Here for example: https://termsfeed.com/blog/sample-eula-template/ And delivering a product, he agreed with your conditions. Can quote to it. Well and if at you such is not present, well I do not know then, can it is time already write.

12

Re: Blind Americans threaten

Hello, waterman, you wrote: W> Well you there is any agreement on product usage? Read that there it is written. If you there nothing , and took a typical bed-sheet from the Internet there should be written that the product is delivered as is, and it uses it at own risk, and you for what do not answer. Here for example: W> https://termsfeed.com/blog/sample-eula-template/ W> And delivering a product, he agreed with your conditions. Can quote to it. Well and if at you such is not present, well I do not know then, can it is time already write. Most likely the agreement cannot be stronger than the law. On the other hand, there is a heap  foozled. What, in states it is possible to condemn their developers if they did not take care of badly seeing users? I, of course, already am surprised for a long time to nothing...

13

Re: Blind Americans threaten

U_E> Most likely the agreement cannot be stronger than the law. Generally I decided that this person menacing, bluffs. Otherwise that this, all software, made in the world and accessible to Americans, should satisfy their laws? Marasmus any. Especially, very much hardly there it is written that all should be the large print, how that person asks. And it is possible to answer a bluff in the line from eula. But if does not bluff, at all I do not know. Is generally very popular a software, made without its possibility somehow there to scale, NI Maschine, for example. It is possible to try for them to write the same, to look that answer Still as a variant, it is possible to answer that application uses standard windows  which completely support built in in   accessibility, such as a magnifier, reading from the screen, whatever,  that there is.

14

Re: Blind Americans threaten

Frivolous? I suggest you contact an attorney! The Americans With Disabilities Act is 27 years old! That's 27 years for you and your company to comply with USA federal laws! I suggest that you cease and desist from operating in the USA or you may face serious legal and financial consequences over and above what you and your company already will be facing. Your company apparently likes to hide by not even putting your physical address on your website, but being a former bounty hunter I am arranging for you and your company to be served with a summons and verified complaint returnable in the United States District Court.

15

Re: Blind Americans threaten

D> Frivolous? I suggest you contact an attorney! The Americans With Disabilities Act is 27 years old! D>... In an Internet it is googled that such claims are not rare - "Lawsuits focused on digital barriers have increased significantly in the past several years, with over 800 cases filed in federal courts in 2017". Whether But me application more is very curiously scaled if to increase the sizes of fonts and scale in properties of the screen? The screen magnifier mentioned earlier, is inconvenient in usage, it is unambiguous. But here magnification of elements - quite to itself, even free of defects sight, on  with high DPI.

16

Re: Blind Americans threaten

Hello, dmitry251, you wrote: D> D> Frivolous? I suggest you contact an attorney! The Americans With Disabilities Act is 27 years old! That's 27 years for you and your company to comply with USA federal laws! I suggest that you cease and desist from operating in the USA or you may face serious legal and financial consequences over and above what you and your company already will be facing. D> Your company apparently likes to hide by not even putting your physical address on your website, but being a former bounty hunter I am arranging for you and your company to be served with a summons and verified complaint returnable in the United States District Court. D> It would be necessary to add its contacts in . Only as from you them to take...?

17

Re: Blind Americans threaten

Hello, Unhandled_Exception, you wrote: U_E> Most likely the agreement cannot be stronger than the law. In the Roman right. In the USA as that law is not present.

18

Re: Blind Americans threaten

Hello, ov, you wrote: ov> in Windows in properties of the screen deliver scale of percent in 200-250. If the program is not expanded proportionally - it makes sense to repair, it also on high-dpi screens gets out, will not be exact worse, if corrects. On correct, any special actions on maintenance of invalids in Windows it is not necessary to do. Always it is necessary to check operation of the programs on 150 % and 200 % of the screen in Windows, and in classical subjects - but it on a subject "somewhere the text did not get" or "the picture/icon went". But it not about invisibility. Visually impaired people adjust to themselves Windows (150-200 %, fonts, the contrast circuit and so on) and all programs automatically become convenient for their review.

19

Re: Blind Americans threaten

Hello, dmitry251, you wrote: D> D> Frivolous? I suggest you contact an attorney! The Americans With Disabilities Act is 27 years old! That's 27 years for you and your company to comply with USA federal laws! I suggest that you cease and desist from operating in the USA or you may face serious legal and financial consequences over and above what you and your company already will be facing. D> Your company apparently likes to hide by not even putting your physical address on your website, but being a former bounty hunter I am arranging for you and your company to be served with a summons and verified complaint returnable in the United States District Court. Write "keep me informed" and not .

20

Re: Blind Americans threaten

CEM> Visually impaired people adjust to themselves Windows (150-200 %, fonts, the contrast circuit and so on) and all programs automatically become convenient for their review. After purchase  with high-dpi the screen I opened for myself that not all programs and far not automatically become convenient. Their mother... On a poppy in this plan all is much better.

21

Re: Blind Americans threaten

Hello, waterman, you wrote: W> Still as a variant, it is possible to answer that application uses standard windows  which completely support built in in   accessibility, such as a magnifier, reading from the screen, whatever,  that there is. The unique correct decision sounded , to the dude to give   as  and  everywhere.

22

Re: Blind Americans threaten

Hello, dmitry251, you wrote: D> in general, at me two questions. The first as to experts in this business - how much to me generally is all dangerously for me (I in the Russian Federation, a hosting in from the USA, PPG, Payoneer). Immediate , and this m **  in . In EULA there should be a point that so it is possible (that your responsibility is restricted to the total spent by the user on the license) D> the Second - as to programmers - it is a question about standard Listview from.net 4.5.2. Any modifications, behind an exception double buffered. D> Why it cannot increase the text standard mechanisms Windows (there is any magnifier in my opinion in Windows), whether are required any  adjustments in application for this purpose? Or he does not want to use a magnifier and simply wants that its increased font, by the automatic machine was applied to Listview... Normal ListView in Windows for changes DPI it is adapted. In application should  DPI-Aware (or not to be) https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet … dows-forms But generally it is all the same better to launch just once at least on Hight-DPI the monitor (or on 200 %) to be assured that at having 4 monitor (or at "blind men") it will be more or less made to look. At me happened that buttons left  for a window, to push to be it is impossible.