1

Topic: Bank for

The alpha bank entered the commission for a currency output. Since June, 1st, 2018 for transfer of money resources in foreign currency the commission will be raised from the account of your company into the account of the physical person of 1 %, min 900 rbl. / max 30 000 rbl. from the transfer total. Sense there to be serviced is not present more. Advise alternatives with adequate currency control and rates more low.

2

Re: Bank for

Hello, Kerk, you wrote: K> Sense there to be serviced is not present more. Advise alternatives with adequate currency control and rates more low. , the Point.

3

Re: Bank for

Hello, GarryIV, you wrote: K>> Sense there to be serviced is not present more. Advise alternatives with adequate currency control and rates more low. GIV> Rajfazen, the Point. It would be desirable to learn a little bit about personal experience that in tariff reference manuals not to rummage How many it is necessary to deduce currency into the account of the physical person?

4

Re: Bank for

Hello, Kerk, you wrote: GIV>> Rajfazen, the Point. K> It would be desirable to learn a little bit about personal experience that in tariff reference manuals not to rummage K> How many it is necessary to deduce currency into the account of the physical person? I in . Under my information in both cases free of charge in in the same bank.

5

Re: Bank for

Hello, Kerk, you wrote: K> the Alpha bank entered the commission for a currency output. K> K> since June, 1st, 2018 for transfer of money resources in foreign currency the commission will be raised from the account of your company into the account of the physical person of 1 %, min 900 rbl. / max 30 000 rbl. from the transfer total. K> sense there to be serviced is not present more. Advise alternatives with adequate currency control and rates more low. On all rates entered? Here  freaks. Someone  into the account of the physicist from the logger to receive transfers? It is time to campaign on payoneer to be returned. Reptiles from different directions imposed.

6

Re: Bank for

Hello, NWP, you wrote: NWP> Hello, Kerk, you wrote: K>> the Alpha bank entered the commission for a currency output. NWP> Someone  into the account of the physicist transfers from the logger to receive? NWP> it is time to campaign on payoneer to be returned. Reptiles from different directions imposed. I am surprised. Because of 1 % it is so much experiences. Instead of finding a new method of growth of the income we tell on 10 % someone suffers because of trifles. By the way, growth for a year is less than 10 % I generally for growth I do not perceive.

7

Re: Bank for

Hello, Matrix_Failure, you wrote: K>>> the Alpha bank entered the commission for a currency output. M_F> I Am surprised. Because of 1 % it is so much experiences. M_F> instead of finding a new method of growth of the income we tell on 10 % someone suffers because of trifles. By the way, growth for a year is less than 10 % I generally for growth I do not perceive. Well in the Alpha more recently the commission for  time in 2 lifted, now here 1 more % will "bite off" in addition so the tendency at all does not please

8

Re: Bank for

Hello, NWP, you wrote: NWP> On all rates entered? NWP> here  freaks. Not on all. At me to 100k/mes - 0 %. Still 100 it is possible to translate free of charge to itself to accounts out of the Alpha. But limits cut about half a year back, was 150. On the other hand they and the upper lath of a rate lifted of 1 % with 300 to 500. It is possible So to live

9

Re: Bank for

Hello, NWP, you wrote: NWP> Someone  into the account of the physicist transfers from the logger to receive? Hundred years so I do

10

Re: Bank for

Hello, icezone, you wrote: I> Hello, NWP, you wrote: NWP>> Someone  into the account of the physicist transfers from the logger to receive? I> hundred years so I do well then 13 % of the tax to pay, as the physicist, it is necessary. Or there are methods somehow this tax of time in two to lower?

11

Re: Bank for

Hello, vladrsdn, you wrote: V> well then 13 % of the tax to pay, as the physicist, it is necessary. Or there are methods somehow this tax of time in two to lower? On the total depends, for example a residue on  52 thousand

12

Re: Bank for

Hello, icezone, you wrote: I> Hello, vladrsdn, you wrote: V>> well then 13 % of the tax to pay, as the physicist, it is necessary. Or there are methods somehow this tax of time in two to lower? I> on the total depends, for example a residue on  52 thousand Well once , and the next year as?

13

Re: Bank for

Hello, vladrsdn, you wrote: NWP>>> Someone  into the account of the physicist transfers from the logger to receive? I>> hundred years so I do V> well then 13 % of the tax to pay, as the physicist, it is necessary. Or there are methods somehow this tax of time in two to lower? 10,4 % generally. Therefore as it is possible to make 20 %-s' authoring residue.

14

Re: Bank for

Hello, Matrix_Failure, you wrote: M_F> I Am surprised. Because of 1 % it is so much experiences. Grabbers should be punished.

15

Re: Bank for

Hello, salnicoff, you wrote: S> 10,4 % generally. Therefore as it is possible to make 20 %-s' authoring residue. On what base? Programming is not present in the list of authoring residues.

16

Re: Bank for

Hello, Ramil, you wrote: R> Well once , and the next year as? As, you replenish on 400 . And again you receive a residue

17

Re: Bank for

Hello, vladrsdn, you wrote: V> well then 13 % of the tax to pay, as the physicist, it is necessary. Or there are methods somehow this tax of time in two to lower? Here just the moment and interesting. That on idea does not hinder  to receive into the account of the physicist. Well except greed of banks.

18

Re: Bank for

Hello, Matrix_Failure, you wrote: M_F> I Am surprised. Because of 1 % it is so much experiences. That's not the point. Business in internal sensation of injustice. Why I should pay for taking away the money?

19

Re: Bank for

M_F> I Am surprised. Because of 1 % it is so much experiences.  a trifle of 1 % from a turn consider bit off i.e. now, increasing turns, if you please, got to not only with tax but also with bank. The civilized bank, in my understanding, should take the fixed board for transactions, there 20 roubles or $20 of dollars, but in any way percent from a turn. Also it is not eliminated completely not that it is pleasant to them then in couple of months break on thresholds of transactions and catch up with the commission to 10 % as it was with rouble transfers to physicists. M_F> instead of finding a new method of growth of the income we tell on 10 % someone suffers because of trifles. By the way, growth for a year is less than 10 % I generally for growth I do not perceive. Well I will find a growth method. To one another does not hinder. But after all and the bank sticks to this growth as a parasite. Therefore it would be desirable to get rid of it. Another matter that already almost all banks under this circuit work.

20

Re: Bank for

Hello, CodeSniffer, you wrote: CS> Hello, salnicoff, you wrote: S>> 10,4 % generally. Therefore as it is possible to make 20 %-s' authoring residue. CS> on what base? Programming is not present in the list of authoring residues. Article 221  the Russian Federation: At numeration of tax basis according to point 3 of article 210 of the present Code following categories of tax bearers have the right to obtaining of professional tax residues: [...] 3) the tax bearers receiving awards or rewards for creation, execution or other usage of products of a science, the literature, art, for creation of other results of intellectual activity, reward  inventions, the useful models, industrial samples, in the total of actually produced and documentary confirmed expenditures. (My italics.)