26

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

Hello, Submitter, you wrote: S> And you know the answer to it? Well you seriously expect, what to you show the project bringing one million a month and which can be pulled in one person?

27

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

Hello, copypaste, you wrote: a C> Well you seriously expect, what to you show the project bringing one million a month and which can be pulled in one person? And I asked something to show to me?

28

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

Hello, Submitter, you wrote: S> And I asked something to show to me? But you wanted it

29

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

Hello, copypaste, you wrote: S>> And I asked something to show to me? The C> But wanted you it If wanted, so and wrote. I do not think that LaptevVV so abnormal that gives to my any references.

30

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

Hello, Grayscaler, you wrote: G> Hello, CEMb, you wrote: CEM>> Therefore at me the existential question arises, whether it is necessary generally to start to do something most if all is already written to us? G> costs. Only the market to research it is necessary BEFORE starting to do something. And how it to research? The companies with tens years of experience in the market spend millions dollars for researches, and then let out to nobody the necessary product, type "New Coke" or "Windows 8". I came to a conclusion that for us a unique method of research - to make the first version of a product and to look that will be. If I listened to the clients would give them a fast horse, instead of the car. / HENRY of Ford/

31

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

Hello, CEMb, you wrote: CEM> Monday ("all is bad, life is not went right, plak-plak and so on" - a theme). CEM> Therefore at me the existential question arises, whether it is necessary generally to start to do something most if all is already written to us? Then on Monday likely it would be not necessary "to them to take Mondays yes to cancel" (), and in remaining days it is possible to try

32

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

Hello, Evgenie Akinshin, you wrote: > I came to a conclusion that for us a unique method of research - to make the first version of a product and to look that will be. Well at least it is possible to ask at subject forums (by the way if it is not possible to find them, whether that it already an occasion it is necessary to reflect it to someone generally). Well and not  especially over the first version to make a prototype and to show besides at forums, to look at response and to think further.

33

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

Hello, copypaste, you wrote: a C> Well you seriously expect, what to you show the project bringing one million a month and which can be pulled in one person? Not one million month, and a half-million for two months. Not such it and the big money. All 7 thousand dollars.

34

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

Hello, Amygdala, you wrote: A> Not one million month, and a half-million for two months. Not such it and the big money. All 7 thousand dollars. Yes, really, ridiculous money, here everyone is so much for a day has.

35

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

Hello, copypaste, you wrote: A>> Not one million month, and a half-million for two months. Not such it and the big money. All 7 thousand dollars. The C> Yes, really, ridiculous money, here everyone is so much for a day has. The second time you erraticly shift periods. Not for a day, and FOR TWO MONTHS!!!! 7 thousand FOR TWO MONTHS!!! That is 3.5 in a MONTH!!!! It is not a lot of.

36

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

Hello, Amygdala, you wrote: A> the Second time you erraticly shift periods. Not for a day, and FOR TWO MONTHS!!!! 7 thousand FOR TWO MONTHS!!! That is 3.5 in a MONTH!!!! It is not a lot of. 90 + %  and hundreds a month does not earn.

37

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

Hello, Evgenie Akinshin, you wrote: > I came to a conclusion that for us a unique method of research - to make the first version of a product and to look that will be. Approximately so. Found people with money, clarified what splinter at them in a bum, made nippers for  splinters of bums. And then, if splinters it appeared much, and nippers drag as it is necessary, to them the pen from a genuine leather, a cover, incrustation by brilliants...

38

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

LVV>> Now he already sells 4 different versions of this program LVV>> And for first one and a half months 2018 lifted a half-lemon... S> If not a secret, in what type of a drawing? A web (HTML+CSS)? Not... For example, one of programs on a photo does a breadboard model for an embroidery by a dagger. Something did for advertisers Moscow too... One more program - for the cosmetic surgeon (foot): on an initial photo results of operation are modelled... Something  with cards - for our Astrakhan University... As far as I know - all became in studio with usage C# In what technology - I do not know. I will ask as required.

39

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

- Modes, delete this post on-possibility. Not in that branch  -

40

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

Hello, Evgenie Akinshin, you wrote: > I came to a conclusion that for us a unique method of research - to make the first version of a product and to look that will be. Well it actually idea Lean Startup and "minimum viable product" (MVP) the approach. For any cases works, for any is not present. But about it is in bulk that to esteem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lean_startup

41

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

The subject formed as philosophical thoughtfulness in morning of Monday because all the same all want to sleep Hello, rean, you wrote: R> Then, unless in features put? Race behind features was actual about 10-15 years ago. Now at us period UI/UI, design vau-effect, aspiration to sufficient minimalism. And generally all strongly changes. . Let's understand to Take, for example, a Visual Studio on which very many people works. Or Jet Brain IDE. Here I appreciate both products features. I.e. it is clear that "the program should be beautiful", it is a principle I noted still about 20 years ago, but the beautiful program without normally operating features is... It is the strange piece And ergonomics UI I, for example, too started to be fond years 6-7 as. Well and here, on rsdn, about  the interface tell all time, how many myself I remember. CEM>> as a result the product appears convenient feature set, with .. The author, but absolutely unprofitable with .. Communities. CEM>> Therefore at me the existential question arises, whether it is necessary generally to start to do something most if all is already written to us? R> I on your place would postpone the plans to lay out in what type you plan it to lay out and on a month two-three to disappear from a society to study recent trends in design of interfaces, UX/UI, typographics, , to creation of the Internet communities, that learning that now becomes young developers who already imbibed all it both initially does already correctly and in a modern way. . It is interesting, but whom to follow the example? Earlier on msdn there were excellent articles about creation UI, But now MS UI is a horror. All right, it will be necessary simply . Well or can eat ready links? R> now I look at all that did earlier and I see a considerable quantity of jambs. At me such it is constant R> Idea here in what. If you spread the program earlier. That it take and swing. Now, if the program does not hook on the user, it even if downloads it, looks, a nose  and takes down for ever. And could see, tell for itself WOW! To send the link to the friend, to publish in , etc. And a crowd of people swing it would seem to nobody necessary . But you will look more attentively - and here the trifle clings here is how, and here here is how.  as it is a lot of all that clings! R> and the user falls in love with the program. At me users fell in love with programs exceptional on a functional Yes, I understand that observance new guild-lines in UI is one of those receptions which strongly lift sales.

42

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

Hello, copypaste, you wrote: M_F>> Well or does not carry and the C> Yes does not shoot, unfortunately, such too can be. Not clearly only that you here found the ridiculous, the HARDWARE is explicit not to fun. Yes is not present, to me it is good. On a subject "does not carry and does not shoot" - actually here the great influence has luck. How many the person which made ingenious products about which we never learn? Yes ! Simply it did not carry, much did not carry generally never. I already told that sometimes received letters, type: "@#$! I N searched years for such program!!!" And I sometimes find any things about which earlier never generally in any way did not hear, thus they known enough in the narrow circles, there are articles/reviews/references on the Internet. And I at all do not know how to solve this problem with information interchange in both sides. And, here both cases: 1. When people search for something specific, and cannot find, as there is not enough information 2. When people do not guess presence in the world of in essence new decisions. (An example with G.Ford the Author: Evgenie Akinshin Data: 22.05 15:25)

43

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

Hello, icezone, you wrote: CEM>> it would be possible to lay out, as is, but it strongly crude on the interface and a functional part. And to waste time on  the finished type there is no sense. I> and you take and lay out as is in a type . I and made, and further users helped with a direction of development and release of the commercial version. Well, I and was going to make, if I will sometime complete it to minimum comprehensible type The matter is that now in it a lot of interactive-prophetic about which I know only Well, type, "here here not to push". Or the functional which classically is at everything, and at me is not present, because it was not necessary to me or it is added on implementation in my paradigm. And its absence causes bewilderment. It as in  would not be a font choice, or in a Word there would be a saving only in txt and total absence of the press of documents

44

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

Hello, CEMb, you wrote: CEM> Well, I and was going to make, if I will sometime complete it to minimum comprehensible type with such approach you it never will complete CEM> The matter is that now in it a lot of interactive-prophetic about which I know only Well, type, "here here not to push". Or the functional which classically is at everything, and at me is not present, because it was not necessary to me or it is added on implementation in my paradigm. And its absence causes bewilderment. It as in  would not be a font choice, or in a Word there would be a saving only in txt and total absence of the press of documents here in such type I and laid out the first version

45

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

Hello, LaptevVV, you wrote: LVV> Not... LVV> For example, one of programs on a photo does a breadboard model for an embroidery by a dagger. LVV> Something did for advertisers Moscow too... LVV> One more program - for the cosmetic surgeon (foot): LVV> on an initial photo results of operation are modelled... LVV> Something  with cards - for our Astrakhan University... LVV> As far as I know - all became in studio with usage C# LVV> In what technology - I do not know. LVV> I will ask as required. I did not understand what program shot. That, what did a drawing? Specialized on drawing programming in the diversified types... Was different operations much, but the program to which it concerned as a hand-made article for the sake of curiosity shot. Did not consider this program worthy the as the representative... I now just do libraries on Javascript and HTML5 which build different schedules, charts, charts. You about this area? And did not understand, what happened to schedules? Whether there was it successful? What program shot?

46

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

47

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

S> I did not understand what program shot. That, what did a drawing? LVV>> for example, one of programs on a photo does a breadboard model for an embroidery by a dagger. Not schedules, and the program from drawing area... It appeared that the marked program uses very much great demand at lovers of embroidery...

48

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

Hello, LaptevVV, you wrote: S>> I did not understand what program shot. That, what did a drawing? LVV>>> for example, one of programs on a photo does a breadboard model for an embroidery by a dagger. LVV> not schedules, and the program from drawing area... And how? Is not went? LVV> It appeared that the marked program uses very much great demand at lovers of embroidery... It is that program which brought a half-million for a month?

49

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

S>>> I did not understand what program shot. That, what did a drawing? LVV>>>> for example, one of programs on a photo does a breadboard model for an embroidery by a dagger. LVV>> not schedules, and the program from drawing area... S> And how? Is not went? LVV>> It appeared that the marked program uses very much great demand at lovers of embroidery... S> It is that program which brought a half-million for a month? This year he already sold 5 programs. And when began, this program allowed it to buy apartment to wedding. Without a mortgage.

50

Re: Whether [Monday] it is necessary to start to do something

LVV> It appeared that the marked program uses very much great demand at lovers of embroidery... Here a pancake, and I for the wife too on a knee  for embroidery did (on a picture does the circuit), about 10 years ago but to sell? I then thought: to whom is it necessary? And here it as appears