1

Topic: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Whether forces EU to let out Windows , in which all telemetry or for GDPR  Windows (and similar cases) -  quite another matter is disconnected?

2

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, Michael7, you wrote: whether M> Forces EU to let out Windows , in which all telemetry or for GDPR  Windows (and similar cases) -  quite another matter is disconnected? The telemetry as is connected to personal data generally?

3

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, Kerk, you wrote: K> the Telemetry as is connected to personal data generally? With telemetry the identifier  transfer? For certain. The identifier  is connected to the license, which  on . The person? For certain. Here it and communication.... <<RSDN@Home 1.3.110 alpha 5 rev. 62>>

4

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, _Raz _, you wrote: _R _> With telemetry the identifier  transfer? For certain. What for?

5

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, Night Looking, you wrote: _R _>> With telemetry the identifier  transfer? For certain. NANOSECOND> What for? In order that sense of telemetry in the historical data, and without a unique identifier them not to receive.... <<RSDN@Home 1.3.110 alpha 5 rev. 62>>

6

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, _Raz _, you wrote: _R _>>> With telemetry the identifier  transfer? For certain. NANOSECOND>> What for? _R _> In order that sense of telemetry in the historical data, and without a unique identifier them not to receive. So the unique identifier or the license identifier is necessary? You define

7

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, IID, you wrote: IID> So the unique identifier or the license identifier is necessary? You define Then it was defined: With telemetry the identifier  transfer? For certain. The identifier  is connected to the license, which  on . The person? For certain. Here it and communication.... <<RSDN@Home 1.3.110 alpha 5 rev. 62>>

8

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, _Raz _, you wrote: IID>> So the unique identifier or the license identifier is necessary? You define _R _> Then it was defined: _R _> With telemetry the identifier  transfer? For certain. _R _> the Identifier  is connected to the license, which  on . The person? For certain. _R _> Here it and communication. Not mandatory. The identifier is necessary to distinguish one thousand identical errors by one machine from thousand errors on one thousand different machines. From the point of view of telemetry of any favor of ability to define the specific person if only you are not going to call it and to specify something.

9

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, Sharowarsheg, you wrote: S> From the point of view of telemetry of any favor of ability to define the specific person So it not from the point of view of telemetry, it from the point of view of GDPR. There is a communication? For certain is. Let not the straight line let mediated, but after all it too gets under GDPR. S> if only you are not going to call it and to specify something. Means for this purpose there should be a possibility. .... <<RSDN@Home 1.3.110 alpha 5 rev. 62>>

10

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

_R _> So it not from the point of view of telemetry, it from the point of view of GDPR. There is a communication? For certain is. Let not the straight line let mediated, but after all it too gets under GDPR. You have a passport, and it is ten-character number. If I generate a file with all ten-character numbers, whether will mean, what I store personal data of all Russians? Will not be, until together with number your name is not stored. As also Windows - while they with telemetry together do not store your name, this  does not get under

11

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, bzig, you wrote: B> As also Windows - while they with telemetry together do not store your name, this  does not get under  Again twenty five. It is enough identifier, if he specifies in a profile . Persons.... <<RSDN@Home 1.3.110 alpha 5 rev. 62>>

12

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, _Raz _, you wrote: B>> As also Windows - while they with telemetry together do not store your name, this  does not get under  _R _> Again twenty five. It is enough identifier, if he specifies in a profile . Persons. And he specifies in a profile .?

13

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, Kerk, you wrote: K> And he specifies in a profile .? You know arguments against? Share, and that I was already tired to write a word "for certain".... <<RSDN@Home 1.3.110 alpha 5 rev. 62>>

14

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, Kerk, you wrote: K> the Telemetry as is connected to personal data generally? And here it let the Microsoft tells, to begin with allowing the user to learn completely the handed over information and to be convinced that there is also that there is not present.

15

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, _Raz _, you wrote: _R _> you Know arguments against? Share, and that I was already tired to write a word "for certain". The word "for certain" expresses conviction and doubt simultaneously. A Shizofrenichesky word.

16

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, _Raz _, you wrote: S>> From the point of view of telemetry of any favor of ability to define the specific person _R _> So it not from the point of view of telemetry, it from the point of view of GDPR. There is a communication? For certain is. Let not the straight line let mediated, but after all it too gets under GDPR. Not mandatory is. Here, for example, generate to itself GUID and write it from below each message. What it gives me communication with your name, a surname and the address? Any. I can distinguish on GUID, it you were or someone another, but GUID who does not give me any knowledge, you such. S>> if only you are not going to call it and to specify something. _R _> means for this purpose there should be a possibility. . No if you do not gather can and not to be possibilities.

17

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, Michael7, you wrote: K>> the Telemetry as is connected to personal data generally? M> And here it let the Microsoft tells, to begin with allowing the user to learn completely the handed over information and to be convinced that there is also that there is not present. And what for it is to the user? To the public prosecutor show, and to the user  all these ?

18

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, Sharowarsheg, you wrote: M>> And here it let the Microsoft tells, to begin with allowing the user to learn completely the handed over information and to be convinced that there is also that there is not present. S> And what for it is to the user? To the public prosecutor show, and to the user  all these ? Well if the user -  to which graciously give for its money  the Product and there is no need. But I do not see any reason implying the loyal relation to the user not to want it. Type of times so you want, here those deserialised  and be picked.

19

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, Sharowarsheg, you wrote: S> not mandatory is. Here, for example, generate to itself GUID and write it from below each message. What it gives me communication with your name, a surname and the address? Any. I can distinguish on GUID, it you were or someone another, but GUID who does not give me any knowledge, you such. As I understood, in terms GDPR it is not required, that it was possible to learn precisely , there is enough if somehow there is a unique binding between the user and a site/service. That is, GUID it appears . The Microsoft generally  wants at activation the nobility personal  the user. By default everyones there accounts and passport. But  even the e-mail and-or IP is considered.

20

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, Sharowarsheg, you wrote: S> not mandatory is. Transfer GDPR page 55: to define, whether the physical person is identified, it is necessary to consider all means which can be authentic with  probability to be used, for example detection, either the controler, or other person to identify the physical person expressly or by implication. Whether to install means with sufficient confidence figure for identification of the physical person are used, it is necessary to consider all objective factors, including expenditures and the amount of time necessary for identification, in view of available technological possibilities at the moment of handling, and also development of technologies. I here think that the MSEC for certain have means for reasonable time and money to connect a profile of telemetry to a profile . Persons.... <<RSDN@Home 1.3.110 alpha 5 rev. 62>>

21

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, _Raz _, you wrote: _R _> I here think that the MSEC for certain have means for reasonable time and money to connect a profile of telemetry to a profile . Persons. Think. To us that what for about it the nobility?

22

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, Night Looking, you wrote: _R _>> I here think that the MSEC for certain have means for reasonable time and money to connect a profile of telemetry to a profile . Persons. NANOSECOND> Think. To us that what for about it the nobility? To whom to "you"?

23

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, Michael7, you wrote: M>>> And here it let the Microsoft tells, to begin with allowing the user to learn completely the handed over information and to be convinced that there is also that there is not present. S>> And what for it is to the user? To the public prosecutor show, and to the user  all these ? M> Well if the user -  to which graciously give for its money  the Product and there is no need. But I do not see any reason implying the loyal relation to the user not to want it. Type of times so you want, here those deserialised  and be picked. All this deserialising and other adjustments for soldiers of justice costs money, and it is impossible to satisfy soldiers of justice all the same. They at first want deserialised , then to remove signatures from drivers, then initial texts, and then the company to direct. Let at once  put.

24

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, Night Looking, you wrote: NANOSECOND> Think. To us that what for about it the nobility? That you though learned something, and that in this subject at you one questions.... <<RSDN@Home 1.3.110 alpha 5 rev. 62>>

25

Re: Telemetry in Windows and GDPR

Hello, _Raz _, you wrote: NANOSECOND>> Think. To us that what for about it the nobility? _R _> That you though learned something, and that in this subject at you one questions. So you do not know, you think. And knowledge at you a zero.