26

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, CreatorCray, you wrote: CC> Hello, Serginio1, you wrote: S>> On me so here more objective pattern S>> https://techrocks.ru/2018/04/27/program … ting-2018/ CC> As soon as you see a word rating and programming language together - know, it . That is inquiry of 100 000 developers from 183 countries it , and an amount of set questions is objectivity?

27

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

S> That is inquiry of 100 000 developers from 183 countries it , and the amount of set questions is objectivity? By the way, about "birdies": now the same familiar dudes from  which could not make earlier normal windows, rushed in deep learning, I represent that there will be on an output competent . is produced not in a random way, and in target groups I do not know, how there at "100 thousand spherical programmers in ", but there where I now work, operations on  on c# for 30 years forward, and not the fact that we will be controlled

28

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, takTak, you wrote: T> by the way, about "birdies": now the same familiar dudes from  which could not make earlier normal windows, rushed in deep learning, I represent that there will be on an output They label the data for training. Good operation which  yields the positive result. Let work. T> competent . it is produced not in a random way, and in target groups It it for saving of resources is led not to interrogate all. 1. There is the true allocation when are interrogated all. 2. Is small (in relation to total number) the samplings made according to certain rules that on them to recover initial allocation with any share of an error. 3. Here we have very extensive inquiry of developers which only on the volume can claim for the best result, than a dial-up independent . T> I do not know, how there at "100 thousand Spherical programmers in  ", but there where I now work, operations on  on c# for 30 years forward, and not the fact that we will be controlled It while to you there does not arrive a dredge of the industry and the ladle does not dig yours .

29

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

T>> by the way, about "birdies": now the same familiar dudes from  which could not make earlier normal windows, rushed in deep learning, I represent that there will be on output N> They label the data for training. Good operation which  yields the positive result. Let work. Let better at all do not work: favor for mankind there will be more N> It while to you there does not arrive a dredge of the industry and the ladle does not dig yours . The ladle is required time in three more : it is not necessary to business, it is necessary to business, that was cheaper

30

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, takTak, you wrote: N>> They label the data for training. Good operation which  yields the positive result. Let work. T> let better at all do not work: favor for mankind it will be more good though that you know in what favor for mankind. N>> it while to you does not arrive a dredge of the industry and the ladle does not dig yours . T> the ladle is required time in three more : it is not necessary to business, it is necessary to business, that Hm if it is necessary to business more cheaply Bangladesh is returned was cheaper, C# we dig in ladle SaaS+JS. You are dismissed!

31

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

N>>> They label the data for training. Good operation which  yields the positive result. Let work. T>> let better at all do not work: for mankind it is more than favor N> it will be good though that you know in what favor for mankind. I know that lost labor is useless to patch Bangladesh bugs in times more expensively, than from a pure leaf all anew to write N>>> It while to you there does not arrive a dredge of the industry and the ladle does not dig yours . T>> the ladle is required time in three more : it is not necessary to business, it is necessary to business, that Hm if it is necessary to business more cheaply Bangladesh we return was cheaper N>, C# we dig in ladle SaaS+JS. You are dismissed! Already it tried, turned out that in  in times is more expensive, and the exhaust is not present

32

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, takTak, you wrote: N>> it is good though that you know in what favor for mankind. T> I know that lost labor is useless to patch Bangladesh bugs in times more expensively, than from a pure leaf all anew to write Before to write, it is necessary given to label. You can make it for one million pictures? Here for this purpose conditional  also employ. Without a marking with C# and business does not reach you. No, you does not reach at all.

33

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

N>>> it is good though that you know in what favor for mankind. T>> I know that lost labor is useless to patch Bangladesh bugs in times more expensively, than from a pure leaf all anew to write N> Before to write, it is necessary given to label. You can make it for one million pictures? Here for this purpose conditional  also employ. Without a marking with C# and business does not reach you. No, you does not reach at all. Understood nothing,  words I understand, but any sense behind them I do not see be published from yours only to you of the clear virtual world

34

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, takTak, you wrote: T> understood nothing,  words I understand, but any sense behind them I do not see T> be published from yours only to you of the clear virtual world And, clearly. You mentioned , but do not know that this such as with them to work. , I am silent.

35

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

T>> understood nothing,  words I understand, but any sense behind them I do not see T>> be published from yours only to you of clear virtual world N> And, clearly. You mentioned , but do not know that this such as with them to work. , I am silent. Well give, try to find that message where I said that I work with any there , good luck to you!

36

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, takTak, you wrote: N>> And, clearly. You mentioned , but do not know that this such as with them to work. , I am silent. T> well give, try to find that message where I said that I work with any there , good luck to you! Study: T> by the way, about "birdies": now the same familiar dudes from  which could not make earlier normal windows, rushed in deep learning, I represent that there there will be on an output You not can represent that there will be on an output, times do not know that it generally the such.

37

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, takTak, you wrote: S>> That is inquiry of 100 000 developers from 183 countries it , and the amount of set questions is objectivity? T> by the way, about "birdies": now the same familiar dudes from  which could not make earlier normal windows, rushed in deep learning, I represent that there will be on output T> competent . is produced not in a random way, and in target groups T> I do not know, how there at "100 thousand spherical programmers in ", but there where I now work, operations on  on c# for 30 years forward, and not the fact that we will be controlled Well so on inquiry that popularity C# - 34,4 % Quite to ourselves normal result. JavaScript - 69,8 % HTML - 68,5 % CSS - 65,1 % SQL - 57,0 % Java - 45,3 % Bash/Shell - 39,8 % Python - 38,8 % C# - 34,4 %

38

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

N>>> And, clearly. You mentioned , but do not know that this such as with them to work. , I am silent. T>> well give, try to find that message where I said that I work with any there , good luck to you! N> study: T>> by the way, about "birdies": now the same familiar dudes from  which could not make earlier normal windows, rushed in deep learning, I represent that there there will be on output N> You not can represent that there will be on an output, times do not know that it generally the such. Where you there saw, what "I worked with " i.e. you prove to me, what you cannot understand sense told in Russian? I know, what if foreheads cannot write the code for two-phase transaction and cannot competently write a normal window in style MVVM it on what generally in IT is not capable or you and with it will argue?

39

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, a_g_99, you wrote: __> Well you to me now tell  there. And in  it  works as language. A principle identical: C#->IL-> the machine code or C#->IL-> the machine code. There is a basic library, there are indirect libraries, is any application-oriented API, sit and write under it. The game logic and a specific functional will not be written also anybody for you does not write. __> together with  That JavaScript which ECMAScript, in Unity was not, and that that was (Boo and  UnityScript, both under NET), fell off as superfluous. There was one C#.

40

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, Serginio1, you wrote: S> That is inquiry of 100 000 developers from 183 countries it , and the amount of set questions is objectivity? Language is the tool which approaches better or worse under different tasks and out of specific targets "popularity" is not meaningful. For example in a web globally dominates JS, but it does not do it by "the most popular language" as is declared in article. It "is popular" because suppressing  the interrogated work in area where all on JS. HTML it at all a programming language, as well as CSS c SQL.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

41

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, alexzzzz, you wrote: A> the Principle identical: C#->IL-> the machine code or C#->IL-> the machine code. There is a basic library, there are indirect libraries, is any application-oriented API, sit and write under it. The game logic and a specific functional will not be written also anybody for you does not write. A> that JavaScript which ECMAScript, in Unity was not, and that that was (Boo and  UnityScript, both under NET), fell off as superfluous. There was one C#. Yes what difference? To whom are these necessary  and attempts? My God yes all do games on UnrealEngine or at the worst use OpenGL there and something similar. The kindergarten suffices already to plant here

42

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, CreatorCray, you wrote: CC> HTML it at all a programming language, as well as CSS c SQL. For a long time SQL a programming language ceased to be?

43

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, a_g_99, you wrote: __> Yes what difference? To whom are these necessary  and attempts? My God yes all do games on UnrealEngine or at the worst use OpenGL there and something similar. The kindergarten suffices already to plant here With !

44

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, Tyomchik, you wrote: Those> it became simple the market  applications not 10 years ago. Even for window leaves a corporate software all on a web. What  a web? You understand, what at all large offices internal networks even are not connected to the Internet? At the best - accounts department access to the Internet has? And everyones , dry, , Boeings, etc., etc. - what there can be a web? A maximum internal portals and clouds.

45

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, Grizzli, you wrote: G> What  a web? You understand, what at all large offices internal networks even are not connected to the Internet? It is assured? G> at the best - accounts department access to the Internet has? And everyones , dry, , Boeings, etc., etc. - what there can be a web? A maximum internal portals and clouds. Internal clouds? Whether you since the morning thumped that?

46

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, Night Looking, you wrote: NANOSECOND> It is assured? It is assured. There where serious manufactures or scientifically  development - any web are not present. There there are , different services , and sometimes a file to copy in an internal network it is possible only after three signatures and two announcements. NANOSECOND> Internal clouds? Whether you since the morning thumped that? And what not so? A cloud accessible only at level of an internal network of the enterprise.

47

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, Grizzli, you wrote: NANOSECOND>> It is assured? G> it is assured. In vain. G> there where serious manufactures or scientifically  development - no web is present. ? NANOSECOND>> Internal clouds? Whether you since the morning thumped that? G> and what not so? A cloud accessible only at level of an internal network of the enterprise. The cloud is necessary 1) Improvings of average loading of resources for the account  between a heap of clients and a scale effect 2) Outsourcing  operations Both that and another on own servers is deprived sense.

48

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, Night Looking, you wrote: NANOSECOND> ? I there permanently happen. At the best, as I also wrote - internal portals and clouds. And any output in out of. NANOSECOND> the Cloud is necessary for NANOSECOND> 1) Improvings of average loading of resources for the account  between a heap of clients and the NANOSECOND scale effect> 2) Outsourcing  NANOSECOND operations> Both that and another on own servers is deprived sense. The cloud is the abstraction which does not have accurate determination. Generally this certain unitized storage or the computing execution context which does not have an accurate binding to certain hardware support. As a result the user can store the documents, or produce what that calculations, in abstract "cloud" for it, having access to these calculations and documents from any computer which has access to this cloud, without being strained by a place of specific storage and calculation. I.e. Threw the document in a cloud - considered the document from a cloud, too with calculations, and for specific storage the cloudy infrastructure, a software answers. And so the such can be on the scale of the Internet - all these ,  etc. and can be and on the scale of a local network of the enterprise. And all these your improvings of average loading, outsourcings  operations is all particulars what that. The main thing - separation of a context of performance/storage from a context of operation of the user.

49

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, Grizzli, you wrote: G> the cloud is the abstraction which does not have accurate determination. When there is no arguments, we pass on a bet about terms? I grazed. Cloud computing is an information technology (IT) paradigm that enables ubiquitous access to shared pools of configurable system resources and higher-level services that can be rapidly provisioned with minimal management effort, often over the Internet. Cloud computing relies on sharing of resources to achieve coherence and economies of scale, similar to a public utility.

50

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, Night Looking, you wrote: NANOSECOND> When there is no arguments, we pass on a bet about terms? I grazed. In general,  on terms, it is particulars. The main thing - that serious offices if will use generally available clouds (as "a web" example), only for what  nonsense. All industrial chain - as was 10 years ago in a local network on  a software, and remains. Anybody in the Boeing calculation of fighters fighting being to do in senses on a basis azure/amazona it will not be exact. As well designing - workplaces and those computing loadings that they generate - nobody will carry out in out of the enterprises.