176

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, Cyberax, you wrote: the C>>> That means "as private"? For brakes: it is analog  files in the public FTP-catalog. V>> it means, storable protected and the system about it knows. The C> Is not present. In the resulted examples for  public access and without enciphering has been opened. It is impossible. In private section the ciphered data lies. Even if to them opened public access. And directly in this place  such cow flat cake somewhere lies. V>> to cipher standard  sr-you files, directories or even all volume and  a la. V>> and public service does not read files without  authorization with input of immediately password of enciphering. The C> Reads. And you try.

177

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, Night Looking, you wrote: NANOSECOND> But, all the same, an initial reason of appearance of clouds it  more dense usage of iron. And how it physically to implement without ? To change assignment of a specific piece of iron in this case it is not simple.> That that you enumerated NANOSECOND can be and without a cloud, this property of any SaaS. And here the shuffle of resources between different clients is purely cloudy. In that AWS EC2 from 2008 year with which you many times stuck me, no shuffle existed and could not be. At least an operative shuffle, i.e. without interference of attendants. So such "cloud"? For example, MS makes the fuzziest determination according to which a cloud it is simple the services received whence on the Internet. This all determination, .))

178

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, Night Looking, you wrote: NANOSECOND>>> You again there. Azure Stack in 2015 it is a pool, the first  was in 2016. V>> Yes you . NANOSECOND> Aha. I shops with storages confused it. What shops with what storages. You already 3rd time speak about Azure Stack in reply to my sendings to Azure Pack. A carelessness. V>> at what here generally Azure Stack if to downloading it was accessible Azure Pack? NANOSECOND> That's it that was. One year ago still was. The NANOSECOND> Now is only Stack about what I wrote at once to you. But  it is explicit not the reader. You "" know a word?) ) With the same success you could inform on availability of downloading Notepad ++ supposedly it still it is possible to download! , you Stack is not high-grade, that is, independent  Azhura, therefore to consider it senselessly. V>> and generally, rebuking on (I at all do not know on what,  not  in any way) you lost dispute entirely,   the target thesis. NANOSECOND> As ineptly you merge. Most did not bother to run? Give already we place all points over i that you spravo-to the left twitch each time? It is difficult to concentrate on an essence of initial dispute? So. Under your version my main "draining" that I Dropboks considered as a cloud, and Amazon EC2 on whom its software was twisted - is not present. The initial data: 1. Cloud determination Under your version, is such  which allows to involve operatively resources, so? In this determination it is necessary to specify - how much operatively? How now - the order of one minute while  starts? Or some hours while the staff connects in your subnet new pieces of iron, how at the time of collocation? 2. Which service gave AWS EC2? You  key questions the message above: - AWS EC2 was normal the then collocation-office or "the modern cloud" in which were twisted ? - In what year AWS EC2 began public/commercial tests  in the cloud? - In what year AWS EC2 moved on AWS Virtual Machines? These questions reflect my sight that there is "cloud". AWS EC2 is a rent of real pieces of iron, that collocation which ALREADY was popular from the very beginning 2000. To Someone came to mind to name collocation a cloud? And a web hosting on the basis of the same park of machines? That. I.e. despite word Cloud in a title, with .. The modern representations EC2 was not a cloud. It was operating by the fashionable term which value was not settled yet at that point in time. Further. The software of Dropboks is twisted on these pieces of iron, but already this software forms that cloud in the modern understanding where pushing of one button it was possible to change kol-in the involved resources. Further. Restricted tests  AWS EC2 the beginnings in 2011. Completely moved on virtualization of processor capacities to 2013. Yours "planted in a pool" etc. - from ignorance. You climb in the Internet, read pair of abbreviations, stick into me with them, without understanding their value. These are manipulations and banal dishonesty. You even on Azhuru, judging by well noticeable "cutoff" of your knowledge concerning it, began to be interested seriously a maximum couple of years back. It c and it you only STARTED to be interested,  if to unwinding were interested seriously would find Azure Pack in its most dawn and would not write nonsense about "strictly restricted list of iron for Azhura".) ) V>> Here what  a difference, in 2007 or in 2008 there was a first mass free storage? (And upon in 2008 all) the NANOSECOND> it is valid, what difference are said lies by you or not. In the main thing that you are right, truly? It was already clarified that you said lies. And, said lies convincingly, even I was moved for some time... Really, there were emotions from discharge "as I could miss"? Yes could not in any way and did not miss, the EC th. And from mind I do not descend yet, thank God. Simply certain the NANOSECOND walks in the Internet to say lies there and to stick people with a muzzle into pools.

179

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, vdimas, you wrote: the C>> Is not present. In the resulted examples for  public access and without enciphering has been opened. V> it is impossible. V> In private section the ciphered data lies. What "private section"?!? What "ciphered data"? In the resulted examples stupidly left the data in public access, without enciphering. Suffices already to compose. V>>> and public service does not read files without  authorization with input of immediately password of enciphering. The C>> Reads. V> and you try. Tried. Did not read.

180

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

V> - but failover a cluster more than 4 machines are already the task not for average minds in Linux, therefore and all this fail safety especially on  level, i.e. shameful crutches  hadoop - as mute reproach to all to it  to a brothel in respect of clustering gets over.)) that there the shameful? It is that unix way. Just as the graphic jacket is carried out on  level or the manager of packets, the docker, etc. Gt_

181

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, vdimas, you wrote: V> These questions reflect my sight that there is "cloud". V> AWS EC2 is a rent of real pieces of iron, that collocation which ALREADY was popular from the very beginning 2000. Enchanting bosh. The latitude of spanning of your errors, the colleague, impresses even the skilled. What  "some hours while the staff connects in your subnet new " in EC2? It is possible to esteem primary sources.

182

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, Sinclair, you wrote: S> For the majority - still gives. I here, , from all MS Online cannot remember anything such that (meanwhile) it is impossible to deliver houses. Exchange, SfB, SharePoint, Dynamics, Navision, Minecraft, what at them there still? It , and I about Stack which on  is not oriented in any way. S> inside Azure I especially did not look - at them there 5000 resource-kaunterov,  to re-read. The most part - indirect. And they in Stack all the same are not present.

183

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, vdimas, you wrote: V> In that AWS EC2 from 2008 year with which you many times stuck me, no shuffle existed and could not be.  , on yours, what means? If you confused with  - last have been added in 2009.

184

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, vdimas, you wrote: NANOSECOND>> Aha. I shops with storages confused it. V> what shops with what storages. You resulted the schedule in which was about shops, and declared that it is all about storages. V> you already 3rd time speak about Azure Stack in reply to my sendings to Azure Pack. V> the Carelessness. You once again cannot read that I wrote. V>>> at what here generally Azure Stack if to downloading it was accessible Azure Pack? NANOSECOND>> That's it that was. V> one year ago still was. And ? V> Karoch, you Stack is not high-grade, that is, independent  And others are not present Azhura. V> Under your version my main "draining" that I Dropboks considered as a cloud, and Amazon EC2 on whom its software was twisted - is not present. No. In that that you declared your first draining that  was the first cloud.

185

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, Gt _, you wrote: Gt _> that there the shameful? It is that unix way. Just as the graphic jacket is carried out on  level already imported reversely, wayland lives at kernel level.

186

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Gt _>> that there the shameful? It is that unix way. Just as the graphic jacket is carried out on  level V> already imported reversely, wayland lives at kernel level. It only alternative , instead of a jacket. Everyones  too do the largest on a cluster ball  in  a space.

187

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, Sinclair, you wrote: S> What  "some hours while the staff connects in your subnet new " in EC2? S> It is possible to esteem primary sources. Well, convinced.

188

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

Hello, Gt _, you wrote: V>> it is already imported reversely, wayland lives at kernel level. Gt _> it only alternative , instead of a jacket. It not alternative. It is transfer of graphic drivers from a responsibility zone  in a zone of responsibility of system.

189

Re: As C# lost the market to a python

V> It not alternative. V> it is transfer of graphic drivers from a responsibility zone  in a zone of responsibility of system. It only alternative  Gt_