26

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

27

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

28

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, CreatorCray, you wrote: CC> the Software which cannot be adjusted under itself - a shit.

29

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, serj.e, you wrote: SE> Personally at me already all production present , except gmail'a, causes sharp tearing away and step-by-step adjustments on search of changeovers. And  too all is worse and worse. And lame it is simple

30

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: ARK> And  too all is worse and worse. Simply to use it it is necessary not through a web muzzle and then it APPRX... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

31

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: > it appears in chrome not all can adjust a proxy very few people is able to do it > but all  likely perfectly understand covers of manholes VP> likely to one  the cover of the manhole fell and he solved let chrome uses system adjustments of a proxy, what for to do as in  at us there will be a counter exactly same ugliness in  - they with any  removed adjustments of a proxy which there were always, and use adjustments from IE

32

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, Privalov, you wrote: P> At me still a prejudice against FF. I used it on not too powerful  On feeble iron  works , yes. But on normal at it it is simple more flexibilities and convenience. I do not want to pass to Quantum because there the majority of plug-ins which are necessary to me till now do not work. Delivered the second chrome, tried to make on it as at me it is made on  - for several often used plug-ins  there was no efficient alternative, adblock is spoiled - is not present more blockable items on this page, it is necessary to write hand to hand filters, and a feature "click also we " - the shit, sites easily bypass it.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

33

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, ononim, you wrote: O> it impressed me with that that starts faster than IE6 As often you start the browser? O> how many tried  an opera and  -  them UI. Irritated with the presence. At ideal browser UI should not be basically. In  (to Quantum) UI just it was possible to make any.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

34

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, std.denis, you wrote: s> > why in  it is possible to use system or to specify the? s> yes  you were anchored with it . You still an old opera recall!) to an old opera to the modern browsers still to develop and develop.  on Yandex. A disk

35

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: > it appears in chrome not all can adjust a proxy very few people is able to do it I here for example I can in selenium adjust a proxy on chrome, but only without authorization. And with authorization does not work, and did not understand why.

36

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, jazzer, you wrote: J> Hello, Vanja Pervachev, you wrote: >> it appears in chrome not all can adjust a proxy very few people is able to do it >> but all  likely perfectly understand covers of manholes VP>> likely to one  the cover of the manhole fell and he solved let chrome uses system adjustments of a proxy, what for to do as in  at us there will be a counter J> exactly same ugliness in  - they with any  removed adjustments of a proxy which there were always, and use adjustments from IE  it likely the hugest  from all programs especially review of history of messages and search in it

37

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, CreatorCray, you wrote: CC> But on normal at it it is simple more flexibilities and convenience. I do not want to pass to Quantum because there the majority of plug-ins which are necessary to me till now do not work. I not the web developer, am not necessary for me much. Though the pair of extensions the Fox in the Opera does not suffice me, yes. CC> Delivered the second chrome, tried to make on it as at me it is made on  - for several often used plug-ins  there was no efficient alternative, adblock is spoiled - is not present more blockable items on this page, it is necessary to write hand to hand filters, and a feature "click also we " - the shit, sites easily bypass it. AdBlock I sent for a long time on a garbage heap of history. Instead of it somewhere costs uBlock, and somewhere - AdGuard. They, on sensations, work better the disabler which has been built in the Lame Opera. However, a problem with "click also we " really manages. It seems that they all time change selectors. I will not state, in Web I do not understand. Only to steam HTML  somehow.

38

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, Privalov, you wrote: CC>> But on normal at it it is simple more flexibilities and convenience. I do not want to pass to Quantum because there the majority of plug-ins which are necessary to me till now do not work. P> I not the web developer I too P> AdBlock I sent for a long time on a garbage heap of history. Instead of it somewhere costs uBlock Tried, all the same inconveniently. In old AdBlock it was better. It was rolled away on the old version (in time guessed in  all FF together with a profile to suppose that was on what to be rolled away if break) P> However, a problem with "click also we " really manages. It seems that they all time change selectors. Well and so I through old UI  so that in most cases no selectors helped them. In new such way is made rather inconveniently.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

39

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, CreatorCray, you wrote: CC> Simply to use it it is necessary not through a web muzzle and then it APPRX. And than it then differs from any another? ? So they at  are not ideal, and does not happen ideal.

40

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, Anton Batenev, you wrote: AB> To an old opera to the modern browsers still to develop and develop. Disputably. It had many convenient features, but  with support of web standards.

41

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, Privalov, you wrote: P> It seems that they selectors change all time. I will not state, in Web I do not understand. Only to steam HTML  somehow. They change tags, at least on sites where disablers do not plow. Something like <sfdjkgvpoijdf> here advertizing </sfdjkgvpoijdf>

42

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> They tags change, at least on sites where disablers do not plow. Something like Ops> Ops> <sfdjkgvpoijdf> here advertizing </sfdjkgvpoijdf> Ops> Probably, I was mistaken. Saw type record aaaa> bbbb> cccc at AdGuarg when he suggested something to block. And before I such saw  a title the selector. I speak, in Web I the full Oslo.

43

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> AB> To an old opera to the modern browsers still to develop and develop. Ops> it is disputable. It had many convenient features, but  with support of web standards. As user, me support of web standards interested a little - let about it the head is ill web masters As the majority of sites perfectly in it worked (means could write normal sites when wanted). If not OpenSSL to live and to live still Opera Presto.

44

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, Anton Batenev, you wrote: AB> As user, me support of web standards interested a little - let about it the head is ill web masters As the majority of sites perfectly in it worked (means could write normal sites when wanted). To spite of a mainstream I will not see the content necessary to me. Well too the approach, certainly.

45

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> AB> As user, me support of web standards interested a little - let about it the head is ill web masters As the majority of sites perfectly in it worked (means could write normal sites when wanted). Ops> To spite of a mainstream I will not see the content necessary to me. Well too the approach, certainly. The web is the market of the user, instead of "web master". In overwhelming majority of cases the content necessary to me has set of sources/formats/etc, on it I will select what is most loyal to me, as to the user.

46

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> They tags change, at least on sites where disablers do not plow. Something like Ops> Ops> <sfdjkgvpoijdf> here advertizing </sfdjkgvpoijdf> Ops> Against such is artful ***  there is other method: the index. In the selector the zero element of the list  is specified BODY>. (If "the artful" tag costs to the first) But here XPath it is necessary to smoke deeply.

47

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, Kolesiki, you wrote: K> Against such it is artful ***  there is other method: the index. In the selector the zero element of the list  is specified BODY>. (If "the artful" tag costs to the first) But here XPath it is necessary to smoke deeply. Does not work. Tomorrow add before it  elements, and write anew. Better the white list of tags in the disabler, including the widespread non-standard.

48

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> And than it then differs from any another? Yes it is simple that that works normally. All necessary features at me all the same in the client that it is possible such to want from mail - I . Ops> Spamofiltrami? So they at  are not ideal, and does not happen ideal. Well, for me they work remarkably.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

49

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: ARK> Hello, serj.e, you wrote: SE>> Personally at me already all production present , except gmail'a, causes sharp tearing away and step-by-step adjustments on search of changeovers. ARK> and  too all is worse and worse. ARK> and lame it is simple  here mail at Google just good, especially chains are pleasant at  it too is well made

50

Re: Chrome catch a diarrhea ray

Hello, ononim, you wrote: O> Suddenly there is a category the user which from the browser it is necessary only . As I delivered Chrome still with early  since it impressed me with that that starts faster than IE6 and at it even less toolbars than at IE6. How many tried  an opera and  -  them UI. Irritated with the presence. At ideal browser UI should not be basically. Only with Chrome except the browser we have: an antivirus, DRM a platform (by the way FF too it suffers), DNS the server (walks on the forbidden hosts), etc.