26

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

SOFT FOR YOU wrote:

defecator;
Elements for those who is not capable on . I ask the experience which has transited tests on years. But it is not addressed you. You only also can that  first on the Internet .

You should receive experience
But it is not addressed you, you are too ordinary

27

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

SOFT FOR YOU, you really ask about basic things and thus want to process big kol-in connections... So for criticism there is an occasion

How many connections were going to process?

28

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

Degtyaryov Evgenie;
We transited it already thousand times. At first I ask simple and difficult things together, then dudes of type  neigh, then I implement. If I spread in a network - they then say that cannot master my code. Therefore the place for criticism is not present. I consider, if something to do to do with a backlog. And I would borrow the code or approaches on the previous operations, but the code filch in one case could not, in other late thought suddenly.
Now  connections. Me interests as to process one million connections.

29

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

SOFT FOR YOU wrote:

Degtyaryov Evgenie;
We transited it already thousand times. At first I ask simple and difficult things together, then dudes of type  neigh, then I implement.

About yes, all remember about "the fastest in the world the manager of storage" and pathos,
Which you poured out in tons.
As a result of code ton left not a dustbin,
As  it has not been finished to mind and to use it in the real
Multi-threaded application it is simply impossible.

SOFT FOR YOU wrote:

If I spread in a network - they then say that cannot master my code.

The spaghetti-code of Hindu style is really difficult for mastering and even more difficultly to accompany,
Easier to throw out and not to use

SOFT FOR YOU wrote:

Now  connections. Me interests as to process one million connections.

On the normal PC - generally in any way. Only tens servers and  loadings.
However, in RTC is ready  loadings.

30

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

SOFT FOR YOU;

wrote:

Now  connections. Me interests as to process one million connections.

As it is implemented in web applications: (very much ) the client requested - the server sent the answer - the server closed connection

31

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

MaratIsk wrote:

SOFT FOR YOU;
it is passed...
As it is implemented in web applications: (very much ) the client requested - the server sent the answer - the server closed connection

In such mode suitably only to Web servers and if constant connections,  are necessary

32

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

defecator wrote:

it is passed...
In such mode suitably only to Web servers and if constant connections,

are necessary
At all is not present
On that is ConnectionPool
If storage does not change - in RTS there is an example

33

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

MaratIsk wrote:

it is passed...
At all is not present
On that is ConnectionPool
If storage does not change - in RTS there is an example

One million connections? On one computer?

34

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

defecator wrote:

it is passed...
One million connections? On one computer?

At one million connections to speak about one computer smile

35

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

MaratIsk wrote:

it is passed...
At one million connections to speak about one computer smile

And what constant connection means? Whom with whom?
The client - an application server?
Or an application server - for example ?

36

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

MaratIsk wrote:

it is passed...
And what constant connection means? Whom with whom?
The client - an application server?
Or an application server - for example ?

For example, a server which broadcasts  from video observation cameras.
The flow on clients should be continuous

37

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

Now to a reality
Why on one computer it is impossible to process one million connections? If not to create on each connection on a flow restriction on a storage amount under flows disappears, and problems with switching of contexts are not present
In what the basic reason of support of constant connection? In what situations a web principle the request/answer with connection closing does not meet system requirements?
does not hold connection, and returns the address of the accessible server? I thought earlier that  holds connections/sessions, and logic of requests and answers  on other servers.

38

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

1M connections on one PC for a long time already not news, but on , seems to me, it will be from discharge rocket science
The author, make a fresh start with 1 and solve problems in process of their arrival

39

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

about 1: 1M , 3M

40

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

Evgenie wrote:

make a fresh start with 1

so much (and even in 10 + times more) it is quite possible and within the limits of the rectilinear approach with a separate flow on each connection if only all of them simultaneously intensively did not attack

41

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

Evgenie wrote:

  about 1: 1M , 3M

In both articles speech does not go about constant connections.
And in article 1M and generally productivity turned out 1 message for 20 seconds.

42

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

Degtyaryov Evgenie;
What to begin - I I will solve. You a technique describe

43

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

vavan wrote:

it is passed...
It is so much (and even in 10 + times more) it is quite possible and within the limits of the rectilinear approach with a separate flow on each connection if only all of them simultaneously intensively did not attack

I in course, but am more  than connections nevertheless would suggest to look aside  since on actively living connections already we will have an overhead projector on context switchings, and 10  connections with a stack on  - search
To the author offered 1 already to pass from phrase-mongering to business and to ask already more specific questions, and that seems to me that it to divide a skin of not killed bear for not so it is a lot of at us offices which have a problem c1m

defecator wrote:

in both articles speech does not go about constant connections.
And in article 1M and generally productivity turned out 1 message for 20 seconds.

About constants
On 3rpm - where that and such is necessary, and and it is offered to author to make at first mvp, and then already to be engaged in optimization for without a specific profile of loading to consider a problem 1 connections that bad shot

44

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

SOFT FOR YOU wrote:

Degtyaryov Evgenie;
What to begin - I I will solve. You a technique describe

no comments

45

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

Degtyaryov Evgenie;
There is nothing difficult in taking standard to an Indy-component and to hold 1000 connections
At me a startup where it is necessary to spend less resources and to hold more connections
If you do not know as to organize one million connections - and tell. And you know - do not pull a cat for eggs.
P.S. At Delphi/ ++ there are more than chances to implement such approach, rather than at Java

46

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

Evgenie wrote:

10  connections with a stack on  - search

as though someone violently the stack on  spreads

47

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

SOFT FOR YOU wrote:

There is nothing difficult in taking standard to an Indy-component and to hold 1000 connections
At me a startup where it is necessary to spend less resources and to hold more connections

Where it is necessary to spend less resources and time from idea to release, and to theorize about millions connections

SOFT FOR YOU wrote:

If you do not know as to organize one million connections - and tell. And you know - do not pull a cat for eggs.

I will not pull - RTFM

SOFT FOR YOU wrote:

P.S. At Delphi/ ++ there are more than chances to implement such approach, rather than at Java

Well-well

48

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

vavan wrote:

it is passed...
As though someone violently on  spreads the stack

Anybody, but by default and will be also the hardware comes with a question why it did not select storage and it came to an end

49

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

defecator wrote:

about yes, all remember about "the fastest in the world the manager of storage" and pathos,
Which you poured out in tons.

And it is possible a reference, after last   ah it became interesting?

50

Re: Who as sockets or network libraries?

Evgenie wrote:

it is passed...
And it is possible a reference, after last   ah it became interesting?

Begin :-Q
http://www.sql.ru/forum/1213139/ekstrem … rainmm?hl=